similar to: help pointers on Linux "workflow"

I suppose this has already been asked and someone is going to tell me what chapter of the HOWTO to read but has anyone configured a Linux server to link up Windows whatever(say ME) and Mac OS X. Is this the best(highest speed and cheapest we are talking small non-profit.org here) way to do it? That is have a Linux machine doing everything a server does-this way dont have to waste G4 on server

Hello dear R users, Recently there has been several fascinating threads on the website stackoverflow <http://stackoverflow.com> regarding the subject of R WorkFlow best practices: - What best practices do you use for programming in R?<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2258092/what-best-practices-do-you-use-for-programming-in-r> - Workflow for statistical analysis and report

Is there a good workflow engine for business process modeling written in Ruby, or that will otherwise integrate well with RoR? I have researched it some and I''m leaning toward OpenWFE with Ruby. http://web.openwfe.org/display/openwfe/OpenWFE+ruby Does anyone have any experience with this?

Hello R-users, I am interested to know if there is a tool that allows us to build SAS Enterprise Miner like workflows using the R scripts. For example, let's say I have the R scripts/functions for the following tasks: 1. Data Cleaning 2. Model Building 3. Model Validation 4. Visualization I would like to drag these functions into a workflow and run them together (output of one function

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Erwan Velu via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been involved in Syslinux since 14 years and been almost off for many > years for multiple reasons. I'm currently trying to recover and while > observing the project with a little of distance I noticed the following : > > - project's activity is pretty

Hello! I'm about to migrate my mails from GMail back to my self hosted solution, using Dovecot imap server. I really liked gmail workflow: - (Almost) all mail goes to inbox. - Most mail is read and not important anymore, it is archived and moved to "all messages". - Inbox stays more or less clean, with only mails that are still of some interest. - Mail (except Spam) is never

Hello, I am trying to stream voice data in NB mode between two devices. I just wanted to confirm that my understanding of encoding / decoding workflow is correct. On the sender: (1) Obtain a buffer of 16-bits samples from a microphone (2) Break this buffer into buffers of size 160 and pass each of them to speex_encode_int, then to speex_bits_write. In my understanding, I must do

Hi Melanie, Thanks for your reply, but if I understand it well, this implies making changes to the local ‘main’ branch, and push from that, which is what I want to avoid. But still, if I push from ‘main’, how do I fold a number of local commits into a single one, with a single comment, as appropriate for LLVM?. My workflow consists on creating different local branches to avoid changes on the

+llvm-dev On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 1:46 PM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 14/01/2019 10:36, Ilya Biryukov via llvm-dev wrote: > > To reiterate, our proposal was to create a repository for each of the > > LLVM subprojects under the official LLVM GitHub account, e.g. > > github.com/llvm/clangd <http://github.com/llvm/clangd>. > >

Hi folks, I've been involved in Syslinux since 14 years and been almost off for many years for multiple reasons. I'm currently trying to recover and while observing the project with a little of distance I noticed the following : - project's activity is pretty low - patches sent to the mailing list (ML) are not likely to be reviewed - Integration workflow is pretty unclear - release

Hi LLVM community, As discussed earlier, we in the clangd land feel that buganizer does not address the clangd's needs as a bug-tracking system. In our previous attempt to raise this on llvm-dev [1] we shared our idea to put the clangd issue tracker on GitHub. The participants raised multiple concerns, including the migration costs, whether GitHub is the right choice as an issue tracker,

Hi all, I have recently given commit access to LLVM and successfully pushed a test commit from my local master branch. However, I can’t find which is the recommended workflow for committing more serious stuff using git alone. I have read the docs but everything seems to still require svn before bridging to github. I want to use git alone to commit a patch that I got reviewed. I currently have

Hi all, If you use the R Editor (not another text editor), please read on... So, my usual R workflow involves having two windows open (R Console, R Editor), writing a line of code in the R Editor and then typing Ctrl-R to run that line. Then, quite frequently, I want to run a new command to check my output (e.g., dim(dataframe) or str(dataframe) or head(dataframe)) but I *do not want* to write

Can anyone recommend any workflow maintenance agreement software that could run on a mysql database on centos and that could be easily configurable? -- Andrew Rice Jr Systems Analyst Carrier Management Systems, Inc. 500 Chestnut Street, Suite 500 Abilene, TX 79602 USA support: (325) 672-0975 office: (325) 677-5900 fax: (325) 676-0529 http://www.nams.net NAMS III, NAMS 2000 Centralized,

Hi folks, is anybody using those two products together and can give me any advice on how to do this? My specific issue has been addressed in other posts before, but as nobody responded, it would just now be interesting if anybody at least uses those applications together successfully? greets Malte

Hi Hiroshi, Thanks for that. I find “rebase” difficult to use. Maybe I don’t understand it, but it always causes a lot ‘conflicts’ that are very hard to fix according to my experience. I have another question though. LLVM requires that reviewed patches are pushed as a /single/ commit with a standardised message, particularly specifying the Differential Revision url as part of the commit message.

Let's say I have written the following tiny .Rnw file: _________________________________________ \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{Sweave} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{pgf} \begin{document} <<>>= sessionInfo() @ \end{document} _________________________________________ I then can go to R and use sweave to translate the .Rnw file into a .tex

Hi all, I've got https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756 up for review currently which simplifies a lot of the logic in our lit config files. For most people, this will be completely transparent and "just work", but it breaks one workflow that people should be aware of. Problem: If you run lit by putting llvm-config in your path and then running <source-root>/utils/lit/lit.py

Is there any project or solution for an easy integration of a WFE / WfMS into rails? I''m quite new to this topic, but I probably need a small subset of workflow patterns (or whatever the correct term is) only. Any pointers are welcome. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, I think I've addressed all the concerns here, and I believe there should be no immediate impact to the current workflow. with that said, I plan to commit this either later today or early tomorrow if there are no other concerns. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I tested this out, and AFAICT nothing will change. It will continue