similar to: Many 64bit locks failed on HPUX 11.00/32

Hi, last time I send you this message I got back a vacation message and no further feedback. Can you help me? Thanks G. Klein -------- Original Message -------- Betreff: Many 64bit locks failed on HPUX 11.00/32 Datum: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 08:47:58 +0200 Von: Gerhard Klein <G.Klein@edelmann.de> An: samba@samba.org Hi Samba Team, I tried samba 2.2.8a (without winbind) on HPUX 11/32. I

Hi, Here's my problem: Samba-2.2.x (even 2.2.7) compiled right out of the box on HP/UX 11.00 gives some errors in the log file: Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]: [2002/11/23 16:17:32, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(661) Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]: posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned Nov 23 16:17:32 pandora smbd[6744]:

Hi, I suggest to add the following definition to configure and its template configure.in to allow samba-2.2.x to be compiled on HP/UX 11.00 with some lesser warnings. Without this definition you'll get warnings on all socket operation because the socket operations are UNIX98 specific and HP/UX 11.00 will support this when _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED is defined. -- Ren? Nieuwenhuizen Afdeling

Hi, What's does a group like 'CPB\unix_group.2147483404' mean? I get al sorts of group when I run the following kix-script that are recognizable and some that are not. Why? running samba-2.2.3a with domainname CPB. ================ groups.kix ====================== $index = 0 DO $group = ENUMGROUP($index) ? $group $index = $index + 1 UNTIL Len($group) = 0

Hi All, Probably simple question: I want to make a share for sharing an lmhosts file which gets included by the clients. This share has to be very public and accept nullsessions (whatever that me be (no username and password?)). I want this because I need to generate aliases on the fly for for our fileserver for some clients (terminalservers specifically). So I thought that having an server

Hi, I seem to have some trouble on default lowering the case on 8.3 filenames. I use the following settings but sometimes I still get a 8.3-compliant file with uppercased chars in my unix filesystem. default case = lower case sensitive = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = no mangle case = no mangling method = hash2 Any thoughts? BTW. using HP/UX 11.00

First of all: Thanks Samba-Team for a job well-done on Samba-3.0.0 (nice new features) Now some problems: 1. We're use Veritas filesystem on our RedHat AS 2.1 server and quota don't seem to work at this moment (/usr/include/sys/fs/vx_quota.h is missing). So I thought that using "get quota command" would do the trick (just call vxquota and parse output). But nothing

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Reni Nieuwenhuizen <rnh@cpb.nl> Nieuwsgroepen: comp.protocols.smb Datum: vrijdag 27 februari 1998 14:26 Onderwerp: Bind failed when killing and restarting nmbd >Recently I get the message "bind failed on port 137 address already in use" >logged in the log.nmb. This happens nmbd gets killed (by me) and is >restarted by inetd (or

Hi, We've got a fairly simple samba setup (no ldap/winbind etc) and until recently everything worked fine (using samba-2.2.5). But after switching to samba-2.2.6 w2k-clients fail to run the netlogon-scripts. When i look at the client it says: logonserver=\\<workstationname> BTW. The output of "nmblookup -S CPB" (to me) seems to say that CPB is the logonserver. querying CPB

Dear all, I am trying to use Samba with LDAP support so I can't use the CIFS binaries. I are having an issue with compiling samba-2.27.a (patched) on our HPUX server. I am configuring it with these Samba option flags: --prefix=/opt/samba --libdir=/etc/opt/samba --localstatedir=/var/opt/samba --with-privatedir=/var/opt/samba/private --with-lockdir=/var/opt/samba/locks

Hi, I got an compiler error while compiling samba-2.2.5 on HP/UX 11.00 compiling msdfs/msdfs.c cc: "msdfs/msdfs.c", line 105: error 1000: Unexpected symbol: "parse_symlink". cc: panic 2017: Cannot recover from earlier errors, terminating. make: *** [msdfs/msdfs.o] Error 1 Line 105 of msdfs/msdfs.c contains: static inline BOOL parse_symlink(char* buf,struct

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrey Grodzovsky (2): amdgpu: Update deadlock test to not assert on ECANCELED amdgpu: Fix segfault in deadlock test. Anuj Phogat (1): intel: Add more Coffeelake PCI IDs Bas Nieuwenhuizen (1): drm: Fix 32-bit drmSyncobjWait. Christian König (5): amdgpu: fix 32bit VA manager max address headers: sync up

Hello everybody! I'am just leaning Python and wanted to write something useful for me, an recursive masstagger for ogg-vorbis files. My script uses pyvorbis 1.3 from the Debian testing tree. so far here is my Problem: The pyvorbis bindings aren't documented. As i understand the pyvorbis package, this is a simpe 1:1 mapping to libvorbis. dir(pyvorbins-oject) gives me an refernece to an

> On Aug 12, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > I had a series of kernel hardware error reports today while I was away > from my computer: > > Message from syslogd at fcshome at Aug 12 10:12:24 ... > kernel:[Hardware Error]: MC2 Error: VB Data ECC or parity error. > > Message from syslogd at fcshome at Aug 12 10:12:24 ...

Hello! Yesterday I upgraded from 1.0beta3 to 1.0beta4. I've major problems now with my inbox (quite large, 900MB) and another large folder. Thunderbird 1.5 connects and disconnects. I tried to delete the indexes of dovecot and thunderbird without any sucess. Finally I downgraded to 1.0beta3 and it works well again (Beta3 was running for a timeframe from when it came out and now without

Hello! Noone has running a sendmail/Mailscanner/procmail/mbox environment? Ciao, Gerhard ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:27:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists at wiesinger.com> To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA with sendmail/Mailscanner Hello! I'm running dovecot in a sendmail/Mailscanner/procmail/mbox

I had a series of kernel hardware error reports today while I was away from my computer: Message from syslogd at fcshome at Aug 12 10:12:24 ... kernel:[Hardware Error]: MC2 Error: VB Data ECC or parity error. Message from syslogd at fcshome at Aug 12 10:12:24 ... kernel:[Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. Message from syslogd at fcshome at Aug 12 10:12:24 ...

Are there any 64bit CentOS5 kernels available that are immune against the exploit mentioned in the subject? Turning off 32bit support is no option to me.. Gerhard Schneider P.S.: Source code can be found at http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Sep/268 and is working "well" on 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5.centos.plus -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs

Hi Gerhard; I'm pretty new to this list too but I think this may be a bonding issue. What bonding mode are you using in /etc/modprobe.conf? You should have a couple of lines in there: alias bond0 bonding options bond0 miimon=x mode=x What kind of switch are you connecting to and have you done any specific configuration to the switch to support your bonding mode? (depends on the mode).

On 02/12/2011 09:00 AM, Gerhard Schneider wrote: > > Sorry, I don't use CentOS 6 now so I cannot check, but: > > Could it be that RHEL6 changed the default superblock mdadm is creating? > CentOS 5 is creating a 0.9 superblock. Some "other OS" are creating 1.2 > per default. But you can change that on the command line. > > If that's the case it's not a