similar to: ext3-2.4-0.9.16

Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))

Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))

The ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch applies with 0 fuzz against both 2.4.18 pre 4 and 2.4.18 pre3-ac2. Will it be included into 2.4.18 pre 5? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 "Debugging is

Hi Steven, Hi ext3-users list! We encountered a reproduceable problem with ext3: When issuing a FIBMAP ioctl for a block written right before while the FS is under high load (RH build universe), the assertion !journal->j_running_transaction fails at the bottom of journal_flush() in fs/jbd/journal.c. We encountered this problem with the arch=s390x (64 bit big endian) bootloader zipl, I'll

Would the following be symptoms of hardware problems or just a corrupt fs? Will fsck tonight when a new power supply is going into the machine. Kernel: 2.4.17 Drive: Maxtor D740X-6L 80GB connected via HPT366 Feb 25 21:26:33 viper kernel: hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 25 21:26:33 viper kernel: hde: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError },

Hello, all. I work with lvm ( kernel 2.4.17 + ext3-2.4-0.9.17-2418p3 patch ) but i can't snapshot a ext3 fs directly # lvcreate --snap --name snap --size +1G /dev/vgtest/lvtest # mount -o ro -t ext3 /dev/vgtest/lvtest /snap /mnt/snap ext3 can't work , ext2 work If I mount readonly the etx3 filesystem, snapshot-it, and remount rw the filesystem ( and ro the snapshot ) it work

Hi Gang. I installed CentOS last night and the sound card detection failled to detect the sound card. I have a Asrock K8NF6G-VSTA mother board, with a nVidia NF6100-405 chip set. I have tried various live distro's and I ran Fedora 7 on it for just over 2 weeks and none of them detected the sound card. I'm a newbie to Red Hat based distributions but have been using Mandriva for

Hi Gang. I installed CentOS last night and the sound card detection failled to detect the sound card. I have a Asrock K8NF6G-VSTA mother board, with a nVidia NF6100-405 chip set. I have tried various live distro's and I ran Fedora 7 on it for just over 2 weeks and none of them detected the sound card. I'm a newbie to Red Hat based distributions but have been using Mandriva for

I just tried this with CentOS 5.3 as well, and got exactly the same symptoms and dmesg output. (As a point of comparison, Ubunu 8.04 on my work laptop is able to access the drive.) Obviously "not detected" is a misapprehension, though I'm puzzled why "lsusb" doesn't show it. The device is there even though the partition table can't be read. ---------- Forwarded

I have an Athlon with about 10 HDDs plugged in, primarily to do Disk2Disk backups. Some drives are PATA, some are SATA, some are USB. A strange concoction, but it's been relatively stable for some 4-5 years, despite numerous upgrades and so on. It's been running CentOS 4 for a long, long time. (years) Recently, I've started to have problems with its stability, and after 2 weeks

I got this.. The system was usuable, but not very. If I tried to access the ext3 volume, it would hang. Reboot hung too, complaining about too many open files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in

Hi, Sorry for the need of the long winded email. Looking for some answers to the following. I am setting up a xen PV domU on top of a LVM partitioned DRBD device. Everything was going just fine until I tried to test the filesystems in the domU. Here is my setup; Dom0 OS: CentOS release 5 (Final) Kernel: 2.6.18-8.1.4.el5.centos.plusxen Xen: xen-3.0.3-25.0.3.el5 DRBD:

Hi, I get the below from dmesg. The server seems to run fine, but it does worry me. What should I do? Other than take a backup.. :-) hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21 hda: DMA timeout error hda: dma timeout error: status=0xd0 { Busy } ide: failed opcode was: unknown hda: DMA disabled ide0: reset: success hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21 hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady

I am running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-27.7.x. Recently I have added a new 60GB Quantum IDE hard drive to the server. I have set it up as a MASTER on a separate IDE channel. Two partitions on the /dev/hdc are /dev/hdc1, /dev/hdc2 - both using ext3. For more detailed HDD parameters, this is 'hdparm -i /dev/hdc': ----------------- /dev/hdc: Model=IC35L060AVV207-0, FwRev=V22OA66A,

There are a number of flaws in the blktap userspace daemon when dealing with I/O errors. - The backends which use AIO check the io_events.res member to determine if an I/O error occurred. Which is good. But when calling the callback to signal completion of the I/O, they pass the io_events.res2 member Now this seems fine at first glance[1] "res is the usual result of an I/O

Added CCs for the author of and people CCed on the patch. The patch has been submitted twice (6 Aug, 3 Sept), the first time there was one concern voiced which seems to have been addressed in replies. The second time there were no reactions. The patch seems to work for Massimo... Massimo Cetra wrote: > Massimo Cetra ha scritto: >> Hello all, >> >> i ended up with some

Added CCs for the author of and people CCed on the patch. The patch has been submitted twice (6 Aug, 3 Sept), the first time there was one concern voiced which seems to have been addressed in replies. The second time there were no reactions. The patch seems to work for Massimo... Massimo Cetra wrote: > Massimo Cetra ha scritto: >> Hello all, >> >> i ended up with some

Hello everybody, I have a question. I would like to get a correlation between constitutive and induced plant defence which I messured on 30 plant species. So I have table with Species, Induced defence (ID), and constitutive defence (CD). Since Induced and constitutive defence are not independant (so called spurious correlation) I should do a randomisation test. I have a syntax of my

Hi, I''ve got similar problem - after HW failure - two of three disks became unavailable and now I''m unable to btrfsck. Btrfs lays on /dev/sdb1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdd1 - sdc+sdd became unavailable Here is kernel log: ============================================ Mar  9 23:56:28 ftp2 kernel: [121492.593338] ata7.00: exception Emask 0x60 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x800 action 0x6 frozen Mar  9

On 07/20/2017 03:14 PM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote: > >> On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jul