similar to: usermapping in 3.0b1

It's because you're misunderstanding how the lookup() function works. It gets ALL the search parameters, including the "mailbox inbox". This is intentional, and not a bug. Two reasons being: 1) The FTS plugin in theory could support indexing/searching any kinds of searches, not just regular word searches. So I didn't want to limit it unnecessarily. 2) Especially with

I have been using Samba for years and am at my wits end with this problem. I have 3.0.0beta1-1 installed (actually, it's the latest Debian unstable package). I just upgraded it - it was working fine yesterday. I have rejoined my machine to the domain (did this by creating the account using NT4's Server Manager to add it and then net rpc join CCSU -U dnewcomb%password -W CCSU (The

Dear R-help, I'm using prop.test() to compute a confidence interval for a proportion under R version 2.4.1, as in: prop.test(x = 340, n = 400)$conf [1] 0.8103309 0.8827749 I have two questions: 1) from the source code my understanding is that the confidence interval is computed according to Wilson, E.B. (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Am.

Greetings! I suspect that there is an error in the code for the function ci.pd() in the Epi package. This function is for computing confidence intervals for a difference of proportions between two independent groups of 0/1 responses, and implements the Newcombe ("Nc") method and the Agrasti-Caffo "AC" method. I think there is an error in the computation for the Newcombe

Dear Josh, Thanks for your help! Does your answer mean, that you agree the two methods should do the same, and what I was guessing, despite the small differences? What I prefer about ci.pd is, that the help clearly says which method is implemented, which is not the case for prop.test. But I do not know who has programmed the function. Best wishes Steffi Stefanie von Felten, PhD Statistician

Hello, Does anyone know which method from Newcombe (1998)* is implemented in prop.test for comparing two proportions? I would guess it is the method based on the Wilson score (for single proportion), with and without continuity correction for prop.test(..., correct=FALSE) and prop.test(..., correct=TRUE). These methods would correspond to no. 10 and 11 tested in Newcombe, respectively. Can

2015-03-04 21:35 GMT+01:00 Shane Robinson <srobinson at simpeq.ca>: > Hi Davor, > > If the mapping of administrator to root is not ideal, I do like the idea of > having a specific FileShareAdmin group. > > But, why chown and not simply chgrp? > If you consider 'root' as a BUILTIN\Administrator equivivalent it might work changing both Share and DACL "the

Hi, I just installed samba 3.0.3pre2 on a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE Box. It's a ActiveDirectory Member-Server and works so far - with an exception: It seems to me, that the "!"-Syntax in the user mapping file doesn't work any more. The man-page says, that samba will stop on a matching "!<unix-user>=<win-user>" line, but all my users (even if successfully

On 04/03/15 18:31, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hello again Rowland, list! > > Sorry for the delayed response, and top posting. > > To recap: > I'd like to complete the member server wiki so that ACLs can be set from > windows without taking undocumented steps. > > The three ways I've found to do this are: > > 1) map root to administrator. (LPH VanBelle's

On 04/03/15 19:25, Davor Vusir wrote: > If I remember correctly it doesn't matter what combinations you > 'chmod' to. It changes to 755 as soon as you change ACLs from Windows. > I suggest you add uid- and gidnumber to all users and groups and chown > to a user:group (or perhaps group:group if possible). For example > chown FileShareAdmin:FileShareAdminGroup and let the

Forgot to add the list in the TO line! Shane Robinson Chief Administrative Officer SimpeQ Care Inc. t. 604.988.3103 ext. 104 c. 604.506.3311 f. 604.988.3105 Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From: Shane Robinson [mailto:srobinson at simpeq.ca] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:32 PM To: 'Rowland Penny' Subject: RE: [Samba] Domain

Hello Rowland, Oh dear! I do feel rather silly. :/ Thanks so much for your patience! I think I'll clarify the wiki (which does mention this, but only mentions the local administrator). When I read it, it mentions that there will be mapping for non-domain accounts in TDB. I (quite wrongly) assumed that my domain administrator was not included in this, and, therefore, would need a UIDnumber

On 27/02/15 19:09, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hello again List, Marc, and Louis! > > I'm afraid my message from yesterday may have been TL;DR. The short version > is as follows: > > Following the wiki's for AD member server (building from source on Debian > Wheezy) and Setting up shares with Windows acls did not give the expected > results > > First, I needed to

On 27/02/15 19:46, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry about the top-posting. > > I have added the bit about the linking (YAY!, I'm helping!). > > Now if we can clear up the ACL issue, this will be a great day! > > Summary: To edit ACL's from Windows on a Debian Member server, we need to > either > 1) map the domain admin to root OR > 2) give

Yesterday evening I upgraded my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE Server from Samba 3.0.22 to 3.0.23. This gave me a LOT of work today... :-( This is what I found so far: My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain. After the upgrade, file based Usermapping didn't work anymore... better: it worked TWICE. (I once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-). So, with LogLevel 3:

Hi all, Presuming that my reply on r-help this morning was correct, attached is a patch file against the current svn trunk version of prop.test.Rd to add the references for the methods. Any corrections are welcome. Regards, Marc Schwartz

Hi Davor, If the mapping of administrator to root is not ideal, I do like the idea of having a specific FileShareAdmin group. But, why chown and not simply chgrp? Thanks! Shane Robinson Chief Administrative Officer SimpeQ Care Inc. t. 604.988.3103 ext. 104 c. 604.506.3311 f. 604.988.3105 Please consider the environment before printing this email. -----Original Message----- From:

On 27/02/15 20:07, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Chown to Administrator seems less flexible than Chgrp to Domain Admins on > the face of it. You could add/remove users from the Domain Admins group, > which allows/denies them the ability to change the permissions on the share. > By changing the owner to Administrator, only those credentials would have > that ability,

2015-03-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 04/03/15 18:31, Shane Robinson wrote: >> >> Hello again Rowland, list! >> >> Sorry for the delayed response, and top posting. >> >> To recap: >> I'd like to complete the member server wiki so that ACLs can be set from >> windows without taking undocumented

Hello List! I have a Samba AD domain with two virtualized DC's running 4.1.15 and 4.1.17. I have had two member file servers with odd permissions problems that I've now given up on, and decided to start fresh. I have created a File server (FS3) with Debian wheezy, built samba 4.1.17 from source, with configure options of : --with-ads --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad ... and placed the