similar to: Delete dead browse lists

How does one get rid of machines from the WINS database? They seem to hang around forever....and a restart doesn't solve it because the WINS data just gets passed around... Michael D. Black mblack@csihq.com http://www.csihq.com/ http://www.csihq.com/~mike 321-676-2923, x203 Melbourne FL

I'm running 2.2.6 When daylight savings time changed this weekend I had to reset all samba sessions as the sessions didn't pick up the time change. Copying file from a Windows client to the server made the filetime off by one hour. Killing all the same sessions (also restarted smbd -- not sure if that was needed) fixed the problem. Michael D. Black mblack@csi-inc.com

I have a Solaris samba 2.0.0 box (zirconium) trying to join a workgroup. But, the samba WINS server (medusa) complains: [1999/01/18 07:18:02, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(672) Netbios nameserver version 2.0.0 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998 [1999/01/18 07:18:24, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(406) ***** Samba name server MEDUSA is now a local master browser for

Running linux-2.4.6-pre3 with ext3-2.4-0.0.6 (yes -- it does patch cleanly) -- only been running a few days on ext3 -- first message I've seen. Jun 14 18:08:55 picard kernel: journal_commit_transaction: odd - more buffers ________________________________________ Michael D. Black Principal Engineer mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations

I am very glad this project reached the state where we can start the public code review. Please shoot the patches for review when ready. --kcc On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > CC'ing the mailing list for the CSI project. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:01 PM, TB Schardl <neboat at mit.edu> wrote: >

We've just released the project code for public review. You can find the diffs at the following links: CSI LLVM pass: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21445 CSI Clang support: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21446 CSI Runtime and tests: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21447 The RST for the CSI project can be found with the Clang diff. We know that this code requires changes, additions, more tests, cleanup, etc.

Hey Peter and David, Thank you for your comments. As mentioned elsewhere, the current design of CSI does not rely on LTO for correctness. The tool-instrumented executable will run correctly even if the linker performs no optimization. In particular, unused instrumentation hooks are implemented by default as nop functions, which just return immediately. CSI is a system that *can use* LTO to

Hey Mehdi, Thank you for your comments. I've CC'd the CSI mailing list with your comments and put my responses inline. Please let me know any other questions you have. Cheers, TB On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:01 AM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >

Hello list. Following two previous unanswered requests (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-August/097449.html and http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-May/096261.html), I fell into the same problem: ACL and lazy_expunge plugins do not work together. I had lazy_expunge enabled working OK. Then I activated ACL plugin, and gave dovecot.2 visibily over paolo.cravero's Inbox: the IMAP

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi TB, > > Thanks for you answer. > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:50 PM, TB Schardl <neboat at mit.edu> wrote: > > Hey Mehdi, > > Thank you for your comments. I've CC'd the CSI mailing list with your > comments and put my responses inline. Please let me

Hey LLVM-dev, We propose to build the CSI framework to provide a comprehensive suite of compiler-inserted instrumentation hooks that dynamic-analysis tools can use to observe and investigate program runtime behavior. Traditionally, tools based on compiler instrumentation would each separately modify the compiler to insert their own instrumentation. In contrast, CSI inserts a standard

Hey David, Thank you for your feedback. I'm trying to understand the model you sketched in order to compare it to CSI's current approach, but the details of your proposal are still fuzzy to me. In particular, although the model you described would avoid using LTO to elide unused hooks, it seems more complicated for both tool writers and tool users to use. Please clarify your model and

Hello all, I've put together a quick and dirty menubar + dialogs + spreadsheet GUI for R using the RGtk package. Performance is not great (OOP is a real memory hog?), the design may be worse, but the hope is that it will be useful in an introductory stats course while we await the arrival of a real gui with ObveRsive and SciViews. The package can be found at

Hello all, I've put together a quick and dirty menubar + dialogs + spreadsheet GUI for R using the RGtk package. Performance is not great (OOP is a real memory hog?), the design may be worse, but the hope is that it will be useful in an introductory stats course while we await the arrival of a real gui with ObveRsive and SciViews. The package can be found at

Hi, I have tried to install and configure the FAX app using the steps described in several mails on this list. When a FAX call arrives on X100P, the fax extension is executed, which looks like: exten => fax,1,RxFax(/var/spool/asterisk/incoming/${CALLERIDNUM}.tif) exten => fax,2,Hangup It tries to negociate, but nothing is received at the end and the other part times out. More, after this

> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:27 AM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hey Ben, > > Thank you for your comments. I've put my response inline. > > Cheers, > TB > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Craig, Ben via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > On 6/16/2016 2:48 PM,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:42 AM Matthias Braun via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Some of this overlaps with the features in XRay ( > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098901.html). > > Matthias beat me to it! >From reading the RFC, it seems that some of what XRay is doing on the instrumentation side is very similar to what CSI enables. The

Hello, I tryed out spandsp with libtiff-3.5.7 and with Asterisk from CVS. I tryed to receive a fax on a CAPI channel. Finally I got a file with 8 byte length (/tmp/testfax.tif). How can I do next? Thanks in advance, Thomas ps: what are hardware requirements for sending/receiving faxes? -- creating pipe for PLCI=0x101 msn = 2258589 > sent ALERT_REQ PLCI = 0x101 --

Hello, find enclosed a first patch for adding tail call optimizations for thumb1 targets. I assume that this list is the right place for publishing patches for review? Since this is my first proposal for LLVM, I'd very much appreciate your feedback. What the patch is meant to do: For Tail calls identified during DAG generation, the target address will be loaded into a register by use

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 has: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings or a clear explanation for those who need a clueby4 with regards to file systems please either remove the instructions or add a very clear warning that damage to file systems that is