similar to: ACLs as Standard Component in ext3?

Hello, I have today released an initial version of extended attributes and access control lists for ext3 (patch against the 2.4.13-ac3 kernel). Eric Jarman <ejarman@acm.org> has contributed a lot to this effort. Since I'm not very much into the innards of ext3, can some of you please take a look at the patch, and see whether it contains any flaws (and tell me which flaws)? Thanks! The

Hi Samba folks, let me first introduce myself. I'm the guy behind <acl.bestbits.at>, the Linux ACL patch. (The other patch at <http://aerobee.informatik.uni-bremen.de/acl_eng.html> seems pretty much history BTW). A lot of work has gone into that project; we're approaching a very stable release soon... Now people keep asking me over and over again about ACL support in Samba.

>> Hi, >> sorry I forget to specify OS. >> I'm using: >> RH 7.2 kernel 2.4.9 >> FS - XFS 1.0.2=20 >> Samba 2.2.3a >> I'm using XFS ACL, but I need set EA(ACL) to Change (read - yes, write - >> yes, delete - no, execute - no). >> I don't know how to set this with standard UNIX permissions (rwx).=20 >>

Hi. I want to use ACL on my RH-9.0 box (x86), so I got ext3 ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ and tried to apply it to the kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing

Hi, We have upgraded our server with RedHat 7.2 and changed the filesystem for the new Ext3 format. Since then we are having troubles with NFS and Samba file systems. Our server export directories to Windows clients through Samba and to other Linux (RedHat 7.2) through NFS. It is also connected through NFS to a RedHat 7.0 server. Since we changed for Ext3 filesystems, we experience to main

Hi, Someone knows if the htree patch is applied in the last kernel for RedHat 8 (kernel-2.4.20-18.8) for the ext2/ext3 filesystems ? Greetings. --- Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó carles@unlimitedmail.org http://www.unlimitedmail.net/ ---

I tried running ext3 with posix acls (see http://acl.bestbits.at). The patches were easily merged and everything compiled fine. I created a journal.dat on my /home fs and mounted it as ext3. So far everything worked perfectly. But getfacl/setfacl didn't work on ext3. Mounting /home as ext2 solved the problem. Maybe ext3 and ext2 don't share enough code to get it working without rewriting

Hello out there again! I have a problem with ACLs: I build Samba 2.2.2 with ACL support. ACLs are 0.7.21 (from acl.bestbits.at) on a 2.4.10 Kernel. ACLs are working fine within Linux. When I connect to a Samba share from a Windows NT Workstation or Server, I only see the three standard acls representing world, group and owner. I have several files with acls for testing but non of this acls is

Hi! Has anyone got any "success story" or any good advice of using Posix ACLs (or Enhanced Attributes) with Samba? I'm using Debian woody with 2.4.22 linux, ext3fs and Samba 3. -- Pirkka

On Tuesday, 26 June 2001 at 15:51, Darrell Berry wrote: > nope, already done that, any other ideas? > > Denys Sene dos Santos wrote: > > > # rm config.cache > > #./configure ... > > > >Darrell Berry wrote: > > > > > >>i get > >> > >>checking for lame/lame.h... (cached) no > >>checking for lame.h... (cached)

I'm trying to set up a cups printer but I don't know much about printing in linux and am a bit confused. I've installed a printer in cups using the web interface and it works fine. All the tutorials I've read though refer to /var/spool/lpd/lp but on my system this doesn't exist. I'm guessing this is because I'm not using lpd, I'm using cups. There are a few

It is disappointing to see the limitation being put by Nvidia on low cost GPU usage on data centers. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/03/nvidia_server_gpus/ We thought of providing an option in glusterfs by which we can control if we want to use GPU or not. So, the concern of gluster eating out GPU's which could be used by others can be addressed. --- Ashish ----- Original

Which filesystem supports ACL? Ext2/ext3 with the acl.bestbits.at patch, XFS and what other? Does 2.4.18 supports XFS or do you need a patch for it? What about ACL on XFS? Do you need a patch? Is there any filesystem that supports ACL, that the kernel supports without patches? Any place I can find a comparison of different filesystems with advantage and disadvantage of each? The Filesystems HOWTO

hi all, i have download the latest verion of samba (2.2.5) and acltools from bestbits. i would use an fileserver with acl support, but i have some problems. after uncompress the tar-archiv i type in the sourcedirectory: ./configure --with-quotas --with-acl-support and i get the following: "checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... (cached) no checking for

Hi, I've a problem in running configure for samba 2.2.5. I'm using redhat 7.3, with ACL support from http://acl.bestbits.at/. I've tested that the ACL is working on the filesystem, and samba can find it too. Here's the error: checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL

Hi all, I've compiled samba --with-quotas, turned on user and group quotas on ext3, assigned quotas, BUT it does not seem to be working. Windows client always shows all available space instead of showing the quota. Do I miss something ? P.S. I run Debian with 2.4.19 kernel patched for ext3 ACL support (from acl.bestbits.at). -- Yuri Pismerov, Sr. System Administrator, TUCOWS.COM INC.

I have been using Freebsd for along time. I have a client of mine that wants me to use Centos for his email server and web server. Anyway with Freebsd to update the packages file you use the following commands. portsnap fetch fetches all the current port trees portsnap update adds all the new ports to the tree on the server portupgrade -arR will install all the ports that are installed on the

Whoa. Long subject - still, it basically says it all: I have an NT PDC and an NT fileserver. I've also got a Linux box compiled with the ACL patches from acl.bestbits.at and I've got Samba 2.2.5 (--with-acl-support) configured to be a PDC on that box. I've put all my machines and users in LDAP and the Linux box' PAM configuration is also told to look for passwords/users in

# rm config.cache #./configure ... Darrell Berry wrote: > i get > > checking for lame/lame.h... (cached) no > checking for lame.h... (cached) no > configure: error: Could not find a valid LAME library installation > > any ideas? > -- _____________________________________________________________________ \_ \ Denys Sene dos Santos - sene@cptec.inpe.br o/\_

My Dell server was preloaded with Redhat 7.2 , Linux 2.4.7-10, gccv2.96 with Ext3 file system. I want to install the machine into my company W2k domain using winbind but my Linux kernel does not support the needed ACls. I Does the latest Linux kernel come with ACL support and if so should I just update the kernel to 2.4.19 which I think is the latest production quality kernel? The ACL