similar to: Samba 2.2.8a and Microsoft Word

I have been trying to access the samba cvsweb webpage all morning and keep getting an internal server error. I was curious as to whether anyone else was getting an error as well. Here is the entire text of the message that appears: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator,

I have a server running samba 2.2.0 downloaded from the cvs last thursday. The system is configured as a PDC per David Bannon's HowTo. I have a W2K workstation. I want to be able to authenticate users who are in the samba smbpasswd file but not set up as users on the W2K workstation. I can authenticate and log in as long as the user on the samba system is also a user on the

> > In addition, if you go to 365, you are NOT BUYING the software, you're > renting the service. You will be paying every year, and a service contract > will cost, and, presumably, cost more every year. > Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of nightmares on Linux.

> > > Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of nightmares > > on Linux. > > Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email address? I thought this went > to the CentOS general discussion list. > I specifically meant setting up and running email services on linux is not for the feint of heart and delivers little real value considering the plethora of

Andrew Holway wrote: >> >> In addition, if you go to 365, you are NOT BUYING the software, you're >> renting the service. You will be paying every year, and a service >> contract will cost, and, presumably, cost more every year. >> > > Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of nightmares > on Linux. Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake

Andrew Holway wrote: >>> Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of >>> nightmares on Linux. >> >> Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email address? I thought this >> went to the CentOS general discussion list. > > I specifically meant setting up and running email services on linux is > not for the feint of heart and delivers

On 07/18/18 13:27, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/18/2018 12:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> >> On 07/18/18 12:24, Andrew Holway wrote: >>>> >>>>> Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of >>>>> nightmares >>>>> on Linux. >>>> >>>> Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email

On 07/18/2018 12:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 07/18/18 12:24, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> >>>> Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of >>>> nightmares >>>> on Linux. >>> >>> Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email address? I thought this >>> went >>> to the CentOS general

On 07/18/18 12:24, Andrew Holway wrote: >> >>> Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of nightmares >>> on Linux. >> >> Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email address? I thought this went >> to the CentOS general discussion list. >> > > I specifically meant setting up and running email services on linux is not >

I have this old memory that the kernels used are a hodge podge of backports etc. So for a kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.9.EL should I use 0.4.10? Quoted from http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/Download: The latest stable releases can be found here. Currently this is version 0.4.10 for kernels <= 2.6.15, version 0.6.7 for kernel 2.6.16, version 0.7.4 for kernel 2.6.17, version 0.10.6 for kernels >=

Hello! We're looking for a solution to reliably load balance our Asterisk boxes. So far we've been using a hodge-podge of directing different services to different boxes/IPs, but eventually I'd like to consolidate things so we can present a single IP address to the outside world. My question is - how do we go about doing that? I've read a lot of things like load-balancing via

I've been using R for several months now, in fact it was my intro to "real" computer programming. It used to frustrate me no end, but lately I've noticed my reaction has changed. Nowadays its much more like "wow, is that cool, or what?". So I guess I've gotten over the hump of the learning curve. Comparing what I now do with R to my previous hodge-podge of

In 2.0.4b using a 16-bit client (in this case Lanman for DOS), disk space reporting for partitions greater than 2GB always reports 0 space free. I've tracked this down to the disk_norm routine in the smbd/dfree.c file. In the code for adjusting block size and disk size/free values for 16-bit reporting, WORDMAX was incorrectly being multiplied by 512 before being compared with bsize. This

Have there been any problems reported with running 2.0.2 on servers using security=server with a 1.9.18p10 DMB? We've run into a situation where I've upgraded 4 of our servers to 2.0.2 but the DMB is still running 1.9.18p10. We have had sporatic trouble with the upgraded servers rejecting correct passwords because the DMB seemingly would not properly validate them. Today, we ran into a

I'm currently investigating the appearance of this error message for a significant number of our users' password change attempts. It would seem from my research that this error occurs when the data coming from the SamOEMhash function is not of the expected format/value. I do not know if this would be due to incorrect data being sent into the SamOEMhash function from the client or something

I posted my original question below to the samba-ntdom list but it seems to be the wrong place to be discussing this problem so I'm moving my follow-up to these lists. Background...I used to be using smbpasswd and the "unix password sync", "password chat", and "password program" settings to keep my smb passwords and unix passwords in sync. This was working well

Ok, I understand, now. I just leave multiple desktops in place and switch between them as I want. But perhaps you have reasons to do it as you do. That is one thing I really appreciate about Linux, the fact that there are many, many ways to accomplish almost everything and that what is right and works for me may not be what works best for you. Your scripting style is irrelevant so long as it

Le 26/02/2015 15:00, David Both a ?crit : > Perhaps I have not been following closely enough, but why go backwards? > Why not start with a "minimal" installation and then add only those > packages that are needed for your situation? Here's why. I'm currently experimenting with CentOS on my workstation, trying out different desktop environments like GNOME3, KDE, MATE,

Client - Not for Profit in the Middle of the Jungle/Rain Forrest Infrastructure - Datacenter is Non Climate Controlled, Prone to Flooding, and has Sketchy Power, LAN - NEW Cabling in main Office building, Hodge Podge of DYI wiring across remaining buildings. Phones - Total of about 50 extensions. Only about 25 - 30 phones will be IP phones, 20-30 more will have to be analog due to the distance.

FYI, kernel build failed on tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git multiqueue head: e9a6aa8a0b7b93195774a9fcf551632bf3abcd97 commit: 67db7275fa4325d46853a4bfcb79acf32e48eca8 [1/3] multiqueue: a hodge podge of things config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config) All related error/warning messages are: block/blk-core.c: In function ?attempt_plug_merge?: