similar to: ACLs and Windows 2000 look alike (inheritance of permissions)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "ACLs and Windows 2000 look alike (inheritance of permissions)"

2003 Apr 26
0
ACLs and Windows 2000 look alike (inheritance of perm issions)
It might help if you view the default directory ACLs using the getfacl utility. These are what will be inherited by stuff created in the lower directories. I would ask yourself if you actually need ACLs at all. The Samba share permissions are pretty thorough and life is far easier without ACLs as you can clearly see what permissions are in use and backups are not an issue. ACLs can quickly
2003 Apr 21
1
Samba unable to validate usernames; winbind works
Running the command: wbinfo -aDOMAINNAME+Administrator%password works, in fact, all of the wbinfo commands report data as they should. However, when I try to connect to a share on the SMB server, I get the following error message in the logs: [2003/04/21 08:28:59, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1328) connect_to_domain_password_server: machine DWP rejected the tconX on
2004 Mar 26
1
Standard procedure for changing smb.conf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is the standard procedure for making edits of smb.conf take hold? For example, what I'm seeing is a share that has given R/W access to a user named Tom, when I change Tom to read only, he is still able to write to that share until I stop Samba and restart it. The documentation seems to refer to a 1 minute reread of smb.conf, but I don't
2004 Sep 27
3
Make archive bit map to ACL?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a Posix extended ACL instead of to the execute bit? - -Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBWDuj2dxAfYNwANIRAvmnAJ4r1Q/2X7YyPKgGWbnnB3pv6WKDjwCgn+Vd 8USnnc35+uAa2GxUmejlDBc= =Bu48 -----END PGP
2004 Nov 02
1
net ads join fails
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ~ /usr/bin/net ads join -Udennisb dennisb password: [2004/11/02 17:31:56, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1006) ~ Host account for if-srv-hos1 already exists - modifying old account [2004/11/02 17:31:56, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_join_realm(1342) ~ ads_add_machine_acct: No such object ads_join_realm: No such object Also: net user | wc -l reports
2003 Nov 06
1
RE Samba 3, recycle vfs and symbolic links
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Perhaps using a MS-DFS share would be more useful in this case? This would allow three real shares: \\server\accounting \\server\personal \\server\public which would appear as \\server\users\accounting \\server\users\personal \\server\users\public. See http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf for more information on MS-DFS - -Tom
2004 May 07
3
Samba 3.0.3 breaks domain somehow.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in a Windows 2000 Native Domain environment, 9x clients can't connect and wbinfo -t doesn't work: bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc00000ac) Could not check secret Downgrading to 3.0.2 fixes this. I can get log files, but
2003 Mar 19
2
WINBIND with usernames with &
Samba doesn't allow connections from usernames that have & in them. For example, using 2.2.5 and winbind with security = DOMAIN password server = win2kmixed workgroup = MIXEDDOMAIN all my users can login, (for example MIXEDDOMAIN+aho, MIXEDDOMAIN+tdickson), but my users named "&" and "bobalso&" (which should be MIXEDDOMAIN+& and MIXEDDOMAIN+bobalso&)
2004 Sep 03
0
ipfw rules or something alike
> I use, thus far, "allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0,3,4,8,11". That > include 'echo request', of course. Someone else may have a better idea. You want to be pinged? Why don't you let something in and something out? I.e.: add 10000 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 8 out add 10100 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0 in add 10200 allow icmp from any to any
2010 Jun 04
7
steam vs wine alike flightgear vs flight pro sim?
am i right that steam supports about the same games as wine? So it could be a wine pirate alike flight pro sim to flightgear?
2012 Feb 03
0
Feature request - search and tag protocol - notmuch-alike approach
Hi all, notmuch[1] becomes more and more popular. At least in geek community. But notmuch is local-only (except ssh)... It looks like it's hard (if even possible) to use IMAP as transport for notmuch-alike work flow. I think it would be great to create a new protocol based global search and message tagging. All core notmuch operations (search, show, count, tag) can be mapped to the new
2010 Jul 05
3
How to determine if R is 64 bit compiled under Unix-alike?
Under MacOS I had R64 executive and it was clear. Under Ubuntu, which I do not have administrative rights to, there is only R executive. It seems that I can allocate more than 3GB of memory, however not everything seems to work the same/right as with R64 under MacOS. Pms.
2003 Jan 21
2
net view work alike
Hi all, Is there a command that emulates net view? I want to dump a list of all NetBIOS hosts actively on the LAN. Thanks, -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com office:610.233.ISIS (4747) direct:610.233.4870 cell:267.879.8321
2010 Feb 26
1
rsync daemon performance
Hello, We have multiple clients that are connecting to our rsync daemon, sending a small file, and then disconnecting. This works well, but rsync forks each time there is a connection. Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache runs? -tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2012 Aug 08
7
How protect bash history file, do audit alike in server
hello, I want to protect the history file from deleted for all users except user 'root' can do it, is that possible? For my server, many users can log in with root from remote through ssh, so I can not trace which guy do wrong things. So I decide to create new account for every users and let them use 'sudo' then I can trace which guy typed which command and what he
2003 Sep 04
0
[Fwd: Re: Macro expansion in valid users = line?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry about that: enigmail got over excited! - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Macro expansion in valid users = line? Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 13:15:42 -0700 From: Tom Dickson <tdickson@inostor.com> To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> CC: samba mailing list <samba@lists.samba.org> References:
2002 Sep 24
0
Changing file permissions from the command line
Hi, I run Samba 2.2.3a (Solaris 7) in domain authentication mode in a Windows 2000 domain. I would like to be able to script file permissions changes from the Windows side using a command line utility, e.g. cacls, however I have only been successful in changing the UNIX world permisssions, not owner and group. A summary follows. Has anyone come across a solution for this? Thanks, Fintan ---
2002 Jun 09
2
"password server" not working: 2.2.4
I've been having some trouble getting ACLs to work under my Samba 2.2.4 client (talking to my 2.2.4 "PDC"). Finally, I checked the log and realized that it wasn't able to map SIDs to UID/GIDs. Further checking, and I realized that the client never made the request to the server. Here's some output from smbpasswd: smbpasswd -D 4 fred Initialising global parameters
2011 Mar 03
14
The program Dls3_32.exe has enountered a serious problem
Hi Guys, Can you help me to fix the issue mentioned below while using the DLS2002 application Error - "The program Dls3_32.exe has enountered a serious problem and needs to close" This application is compatible on Win 2K/95/98. OS I am using - Ubuntu 10.10 I have installed wine. Do I have to change any information in the Wine configuration or do you have any ideas what registry / .dll
2003 Oct 09
1
Release date for Samba 3.0.1?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there a tentative release date for 3.0.1 yet? I'd like to go live with an official release as opposed to hand patching all the little fixes I've seen on the mailing list (i.e., sorry about that; here's a patch, will be in 3.0.1). Thank you for all your work! - -Tom Dickson InoStor, Inc. http://www.inostor.com -----BEGIN PGP