similar to: Samba 2.2.5 issues?

It might help if you view the default directory ACLs using the getfacl utility. These are what will be inherited by stuff created in the lower directories. I would ask yourself if you actually need ACLs at all. The Samba share permissions are pretty thorough and life is far easier without ACLs as you can clearly see what permissions are in use and backups are not an issue. ACLs can quickly

I've gotten samba working with ACLs over an XFS filesystem. Everything works pretty well with knowledge of the workarounds (cannot remove group everyone, etc.) The only major problem I have is that ACLs don't inherit correctly. The default in Windows 2000 is to have a sub folder inherit the permissions of the folder it is in on creation. By default, the Samba share's folders don't

Samba doesn't allow connections from usernames that have & in them. For example, using 2.2.5 and winbind with security = DOMAIN password server = win2kmixed workgroup = MIXEDDOMAIN all my users can login, (for example MIXEDDOMAIN+aho, MIXEDDOMAIN+tdickson), but my users named "&" and "bobalso&" (which should be MIXEDDOMAIN+& and MIXEDDOMAIN+bobalso&)

Hi everybody, does somebody know why when I install a samba 2.2.5 or 2.2.6, it doesn't put the file which contains the password samba, i.e. /etc/samba/smbpasswd . With the result that when I have just created a user linux and that I want to add it under samba "smbpasswd user" it lets me enter the password but failed when it wants to reach the base. Somebody has an idea? thanks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a Posix extended ACL instead of to the execute bit? - -Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBWDuj2dxAfYNwANIRAvmnAJ4r1Q/2X7YyPKgGWbnnB3pv6WKDjwCgn+Vd 8USnnc35+uAa2GxUmejlDBc= =Bu48 -----END PGP

Hi, could someone who is close to the Samba development make a comment about the automatic printer drivers features in Samba 2.2.5 I've been trying to get this working unsuccessfully, and have seen many messages posted from people having trouble with this feature. Not sure if this is an unnusual number of people with problems, but it seems like it ( I could be too close to the problem to see

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry about that: enigmail got over excited! - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Macro expansion in valid users = line? Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 13:15:42 -0700 From: Tom Dickson <tdickson@inostor.com> To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> CC: samba mailing list <samba@lists.samba.org> References:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Perhaps using a MS-DFS share would be more useful in this case? This would allow three real shares: \\server\accounting \\server\personal \\server\public which would appear as \\server\users\accounting \\server\users\personal \\server\users\public. See http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf for more information on MS-DFS - -Tom

Running the command: wbinfo -aDOMAINNAME+Administrator%password works, in fact, all of the wbinfo commands report data as they should. However, when I try to connect to a share on the SMB server, I get the following error message in the logs: [2003/04/21 08:28:59, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1328) connect_to_domain_password_server: machine DWP rejected the tconX on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is the standard procedure for making edits of smb.conf take hold? For example, what I'm seeing is a share that has given R/W access to a user named Tom, when I change Tom to read only, he is still able to write to that share until I stop Samba and restart it. The documentation seems to refer to a 1 minute reread of smb.conf, but I don't

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ~ /usr/bin/net ads join -Udennisb dennisb password: [2004/11/02 17:31:56, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1006) ~ Host account for if-srv-hos1 already exists - modifying old account [2004/11/02 17:31:56, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_join_realm(1342) ~ ads_add_machine_acct: No such object ads_join_realm: No such object Also: net user | wc -l reports

I'm hitting the 2G limit taring from 2.2.2 to ntfs NT4. could this be my problem as well. -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Klaus Ethgen Sent: 29 November 2002 4:10 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Version 2.2.6 and above are not able to store big files over 2GB Hello, when I store a file biger than

Hi guys... I setup samba 2.2.5 as a PDC ... I have w2k clients. It seems that now I am prompted to change my password because it is going to expire Could you guys tell me how and where to disable password expiry? cheers`

I've installed RH8 and samba 2.2.5 with success , my testparam is ok. When I type smbstatus I am receiving: Failed to open byte range locking database Error: Failed to initialize locking database cant initialize locking module. Does anyone know what is happening? Thanks Elias _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do Brasil.

I'm new to Samba (and relatively new to Linux itself), so please be gentle. I'm running 2.2.5-1 on RH7.3 and I have it setup and running as a WINS server and I would like to get it up and running as a PDC for my Win2K environment. I've searched the archives, followed the documentation from samba.org and a few other books on Samba itself and I cannot get a Win2K machine to log into the

Hello, samba. I upgraded samba 2.2.5 to samba 2.2.6 in Debian 3.0. Both versions was built myself by script "rules binary". Before: Our network have a few of W2KSP2.rus and a few of W2KSP2RP1.rus. All workstations can logon to samba 2.2.5. After: W2KSP2.rus can't login to samba 2.2.6, though W2KSP2RP1.rus still can logon to PDC on samba 2.2.6. W2KSP2 tells me, that it can not find

Hi, I've just installed samba 2.2.6 [solaris 2.6] and while ./smbstatus (on solaris) reports version 2.2.6, network neighbourhood [ or net view4] (on win 2k/win98) report Samba 2.2.5 Any ideas? ta iain -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Iain Morrison MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit 15 Chaucer Road Tel 01223 355294 xt 581

Sorry if this is going to be one of those 'idiot' questions, but I don't use Samba. It has always been on our server, chugging along beautifully so no on ever had to touch it... Well, we consolidated servers and moved everything to another server with HP-UX 10.20 (the previous server had the same HPUX version so I thought I was in the clear), the samba version is samba-1.9.18p2. I

Hello. I have a network with a server running Samba 2.2.5. I just recieved a laptop from Compaq with winxp on it. I already have a few winxp boxes on my network connecting to the Samba server just fine so I though setting up this laptop should be a breeze but after I change the required registry entries on this laptop (the "requires sign or seal registry entry to 0") It gives me the

Hi there - apologies for the long-ish mail! I recently performed a SuSE online update to my system, and since then Samba has refused to work properly. After the update, nmbd produces the infamous message: Aug 29 19:26:39 linuxserver nmbd[7208]: [2003/08/29 19:26:39, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) Aug 29 19:26:39 linuxserver nmbd[7208]: find_response_record: