similar to: Installing 2.0.10a patch

Hi @all, in which version MAX_DEBUG_LEVEL in local.h and debug.h is available (not in 2.2.8a and not in 2.0.10a)? I want to get smaller binaries for the router system fli4l (router on a floppy) with reducing the amount of debugging informations. I have to use on of the above versions due last security fixes. I would prefere 2.0.10a, because it is smaller as 2.2.8a and has functionality enough for

Hi all, I see centos 3.5Beta in the beta.centos.org. Is this the next release of version 3 ? Strangely, 3.4 is not the final release of version 3 ? Thx Ceg Ryan

Hello Folks, We have 2 (identical hardware) busy public 2U rack servers, both have several hundred users & peak email (for example) deliveries at 300/5min during the daytime. Both servers run RAID1 over 2 EIDE disk drives. One server is fine - it never has problems - it is running RH7.3 and CPU loads are normal. The other server has constant disk activity & kjournald at CPU load of

I thought I'd summarise this with a proper subject line: 1. We used up2date to upgrade the kernel of a 7.2 machine that is doing far too much journalling (kjournald at 50% CPU+ often). 2. It installed fine, but when we reboot - GRUB only shows the old 2.4.7-10 although there are 3 kernels listed in grub.conf My Question is "How can we select booting to 2.4.18-24.7 when GRUB lonly lists

On 14/01/2015 03:56, Emmett Culley wrote: > On 01/13/2015 12:10 PM, Mateusz Guz wrote: >> Have you found a solution? >> >> Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce >>

Mike Lander wrote: > I am building a shorewall box that the last post has the SSH error and > wanted > some feedback from the list if possible. At first I thought the two ISP''s > I > building this > for had two T-1''s with FQ ip''s as it. I have the box built for this ready > to > go. > Now I find out that one of the T-1''s is

Hello, We are currently running SAMBA 2.07 on our AIX 4.3.3 UNIX systems. We just received the following: OpenPKG Security Advisory OpenPKG-SA-2003.028: samba - remote root exploit Does this affect SAMBA 2.07? This is all that I see affected: OpenPKG Security Advisory The OpenPKG Project http://www.openpkg.org/security.html http://www.openpkg.org

Have you found a solution? Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:02 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:

I am having a mail server problem where the mail to one domain is being sent to the wrong server. When I use "dig masonc.com mx", I get ;; ANSWER SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN MX 5 mail.masonc.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.picadoo.com. masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns2.picadoo.com. ;;

After upgrading from 2.0.10a to 2.2.4, I'm seeing many new messages being logged. What does this mean? Jun 5 09:42:50 files2 smbd[27585]: [2002/06/05 09:42:50, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(788) Jun 5 09:42:50 files2 smbd[27585]: oplock_break: no break received from client within 30 seconds. Jun 5 09:42:50 files2 smbd[27585]: oplock_break failed for file

Hello everyone - I run bind version 9.8.2 on CentOS 6.5. The daily logwatch run sends me the following items. Are any of these a real problem? ============ checkhints: extra NS 'A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s)

We run several RH7.2/7.3 servers & recently 2 of them, although still working fine, have started to show kjournald as generally using over 50% cpu% on 'top' - virtually continuously. Free cpu% generally less than 25% now! Both machines are also using software RAID5 EIDE ....... otherwise are standard server installs. Any info on what kjournald is & why it should have recently

What version of shorewall do you suggest I try on a FC3 system? TIA, /ChJ

OK Ladies and Gentlemen I could use a hand on this one. I'm new to the list, so please excuse me if I violate a protocol which is as yet unknown to me. However I am having some problems that seem to be beyond my abilities to find a solution to. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Technical Info: LINUX Box is a Red Hat 7.1 Kernel version is 2.4.9-34. Samba version(S) that I am

Hello I''m trying to install shorewall 2.0.10 install on slackware10 the installation script gives the following error (which is ok since slackware uses /etc/rc.d/rc.local) but then it doesn''t create the directories /etc/shorewall or /usr/share/shorewall root@brujula5:~/shorewall-2.0.10# ./install.sh Installing Shorewall Version 2.0.10 shorewall control program installed in

I have two openvz servers running Centos 6.x both with 32GB of RAM. One is an Intel Xeon E3-1230 quad core with two 4TB 7200 SATA drives in software RAID1. The other is an old HP DL380 dual quad core with 8 750GB 2.5" SATA drives in hardware RAID6. I want to figure out which one has better random I/O performance to host a busy container. The DL380 currently has one failed drive in the

Hello Guys, I'm having a very strange problem with my file server ( latest samba RPM from redhat ) [root@krusty secundarias]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-client-2.0.10-2 samba-2.0.10-2 samba-common-2.0.10-2 [root@krusty samba]# uname -r 2.2.19 One of our machines ( NT4 workstation with SP6a ) is saving files on a share that becames unacessible for all users. After some research on

I''m noticing some weirdness in my ulog files with version 2.0.10. Here is a portion of the log: Jan 7 11:01:37 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:0a:95:b2:11:4c:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.100 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=97 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=44155 CE PROTO=UDP SPT=631 DPT=631 LEN=77 Jan 7 11:01:39 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=

This release boasts a bunch of cleanup work and a few new keysyms. No functional changes to any of the protocols. Adam Jackson (3): randrproto: Fix missing #undef RRLease Remove COPYING-panoramixproto composite: Fix the documentation for the unredirection requests Alan Coopersmith (9): Remove trailing whitespace from header files Remove the use of no-op B16 &

Hi! Sorry my late answer. I did run the sysvolcheck/reset commands and everything seems fine. On my server I use the following rpm packages, installed from the tranquil.it repository. ldb-tools.x86_64 2.0.10-1.el7?????????????????? @samba_custom libldb.x86_64?????????????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom libldb-devel.x86_64???????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom