similar to: W2K batch scripting error

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "W2K batch scripting error"

2007 Apr 24
1
Re: Re: Symlinks deletion behaviour
Hi Jeremy, Thanks for your response, but it doesn't work either with exactly the same symptoms: [2007/04/24 09:52:43, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(926) switch message SMBrmdir (pid 19730) conn 0x80414a30 [2007/04/24 09:52:43, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(181) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2007/04/24 09:52:43, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(147) unix_convert
2004 Jun 21
2
problems with --read-batch and --write-batch with --files-from
Hello, I want to use the --read/write-batch options, but i have problems to do so. The shell script [1] leads to the following error: [sender] expand file_list to 131072 bytes, did move delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file file1 rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 64 bytes: phase "unknown": Daten?bergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe) rsync error: error in
2008 Jun 18
0
Improper directory removal causes file system havoc (PR#11738)
Full_Name: Michael Bauer Version: 2.7.0 OS: Solaris 10 (sparc) Submission from: (NULL) (130.64.21.7) When running 'make check' on a fresh R 2.7.0 build on Solaris 10 (sparc), reg-tests-1.R fails consistently because the test directory /tmp/R<random> cannot be deleted. The reason for the deletion failure is because the file system thinks that the directory is still full, as its
2008 Jun 19
0
Improper directory removal causes file system havoc (PR#11747)
This is not general on Solaris 10 -- it works for others, as the R-admin manual told you. What sort of file system is the test being run on? It does look very like a Solaris file system bug. On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, mjbauer at eecs.tufts.edu wrote: > Full_Name: Michael Bauer > Version: 2.7.0 > OS: Solaris 10 (sparc) > Submission from: (NULL) (130.64.21.7) > > > When running
2013 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] assert when mixing static and non-static members with an external AST source
FYI, this turned out to be an error of omission in LLDB in SymbolFileDWARF, because the case of a non-defining external (i.e. a static member variable) wasn't being handled with a variable lookup to dig up the location. I'll put a patch together for lldb-commits, - Ashok From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Thirumurthi, Ashok
2005 Dec 02
0
WEBrick access from other computer
Here''s a strange one. I''m getting into Rails and have installed Ruby and RoR onto a Linux box for testing (Ubuntu). It all seems to work while I''m on the linux machine. Using WEBrick I can go to the page and see my test page. But I want not have to sit at the linux box to play around, so I tried accessing the WEBrick server from another system on my network and it
2006 Apr 24
0
saving from word & excel
hi, we're using a samba-server over DSL using openVPN and the speed is very good at browsing directories and quite OK at loading/saving files except for word & excel where it takes about 20-30 seconds to save even a small file. which is no wonder because the following happens in log.smbd when i click "save" in word, it obviously checks for a bazillion tmp- and lockfiles (
2006 Oct 16
1
Question regarding ''tidy'' type
Hello all, I am trying to use the tidy type to clean up a directory that I use for running scripts via puppet. My relevant manifest looks like: tidy { "/root/.puppet/" : age => ''30D'', path => ''/root/.puppet/'', recurse => true, rmdirs => true, type => atime, } However, when I run puppet it
2013 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] assert when mixing static and non-static members with an external AST source
So, when performing expression evaluation, lldb trips over an assert in clang/lib/AST/RecordLayoutBuilder because ExternalFieldOffsets doesn't contain a FieldDecl that updateExternalFieldOffset expected. I found that the assert occurs when both static and non-static member variables are present. For instance, with the following, the lldb command 'expr my_test.length()' does not
2002 Nov 19
2
The exclude option of Rsync not work right.
Hello, Can someone explain why my exclude option is not excluding filles as instructed in my script below. I have tried multiple methods and still have been unsuccessful in excluding the one file "test.sql". The methods I have tried are: 1. Removing EXTRAFLAG variable -a 2. Removing using -a 3. Option --include infront of --exclude and behind of --exclude. 4. rsync /software/testdir/
2015 Oct 07
1
[Bug 11545] New: -A (preserve ACLs) with --link-dest=DIR fails when DIR has a directory with the same file's name
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11545 Bug ID: 11545 Summary: -A (preserve ACLs) with --link-dest=DIR fails when DIR has a directory with the same file's name Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5
2005 Nov 20
2
ZFS & small files
First - many, many congrats to team ZFS. Developing/writing a new Unix fs is a very non-trivial exercise with zero tolerance for developer bugs. I just loaded build 27a on a w1100z with a single AMD 150 CPU (2Gb RAM) and a single (for now) SCSI disk drive: FUJITSU MAP3367NP (Revision: 0108) hooked up to the built-in SCSI controller (the only device on the SCSI bus). My initial ZFS test was to
2012 Jul 18
1
3.6.5: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED from Win7 to 750 dir
Hello, after upgrading from Samba 3.5.6 to 3.6.5 I encounter some strange NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED trouble when trying to access group readable directories from Windows 7 or Windows 2008 Terminal Server. Very strange stuff is that it works fine using smbclient from a Linux machine using the same userid and Kerberos authentication. The Server is fully integrated into active directory and uses
2008 Apr 28
3
[Bug 1657] New: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/ zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2
2010 Jul 03
0
Samba 3.0.33 ignoring group ACL after joining to AD
Hello, I have installed CentOS 4.8 with samba 3.0.33. After joining to AD, group permission do not work. After "net groupmap add..." command nothing changed: # getfacl TESTDIR/ # file: TESTDIR # owner: root # group: testgroup user::rwx group::rwx other::--- user1 is in group "testgroup" net groupmap list testgroup (S-1-5-21-2207241064-1835560224-3992551478-2193) ->
2017 Nov 06
0
Gluster clients can't see directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume, but can enter them.
Hi, Please provide the gluster volume info. Do you see any errors in the client mount log file (/var/log/glusterfs/var-lib-mountedgluster.log)? Thanks, Nithya On 6 November 2017 at 05:13, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote: > We've got an issue with Gluster (3.12.x) where clients can't see > directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume. >
2007 Oct 26
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5043] New: Qualified non-inherited filter rules may be ignored
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5043 Summary: Qualified non-inherited filter rules may be ignored Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2017 Nov 05
2
Gluster clients can't see directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume, but can enter them.
We've got an issue with Gluster (3.12.x) where clients can't see directories that exist or are created within a mounted volume. We can see files, but not directories (with ls, find etc...) We can enter (cd) into directories, even if we can't see them. - Host typology is: 2 replica, 1 arbiter. - Volumes are: replicated and running on XFS on the hosts. - Clients are: GlusterFS native
2010 May 19
2
Samba 3.0.33 ACL rename/delete issue
Hello, I have noticed some ALC issues with files and directories. I use samba server 3.0.33 on CentOS 4.8 joined to Windows 2003 domain. Everything works fine, all users are authenticated to domain controller. My aim is to give FULL ACCESS (open/read/write/rename/delete..) to directory "testdir" to two users, john and mark without using groups because I have no permissions on domain
2023 Feb 13
1
access "claim types"
On 13/02/2023 10:54, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 10.02.23 um 11:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Hmm, so there is a DC that is having some dns problems and the windows >> admin isn't bothered that this 'may' be replicating to his other DC's >> ???? > > seems so > > I don't know if he would take that one DC down if