Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "librsync ??"
2003 Mar 01
0
librsync [Solved]
I found the cvs repository at =
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/
The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have =
been why google could not find it yesterday.
I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated.
The 0.9.5.1 version I was looking for looks to me to be a Jun. 27 cvs snapshot =
from wherever cvs was at that
2003 Jun 08
2
state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)
I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship,
remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites),
Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the
programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written,
could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's
response for the state of rsync,
2002 Apr 24
1
[rproxy-devel] rdiff deltas not very good compared to pysync, why?
On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote:
> Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of
> activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make
> a new release?
I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months,
because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync
2004 Apr 08
2
[librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for
> > case 1), 3), and 4).
>
> Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably
> something stronger than md4 like SHA-1.
md4 is probably good enough for most
2002 May 13
3
Problems building Samba 2.2.4 under HPUX 10.20
Hi,
i tried to build Samba 2.2.4 under HPUX 10.20, but configure generated a
Makfile with systax errors.
make
Make: line 664: syntax error. Stop.
Makefile Line 664 shows:
: $(WINBIND_NSS_PICOBJS)
there should be something before the :
configure said:
checking whether to build winbind... no, unsupported on hpux10.20
is there a woraround, or can somebody tell me whats before the :
Roland
2001 Sep 14
0
librsync 0.9.5 released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
librsync 0.9.5 is released from rproxy.samba.org. This release
contains small but important bug fixes.
Changes in 0.9.5:
* Bugfix patch from Shirish Hemant Phatak
MD5 checksum:
df1c35520e4b0bf9d6d7ac813ba86a14 *librsync-0.9.5.tar.gz
- --
Martin Pool
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
1999 May 06
5
Backup
Hello All,
I am setting up a samba backup UNIX box. It will periodically login onto
a windoze box(with smbclient), pickup the files, and save them.
The problem is that I couldn't make any error correction in case of
power blackout or anything similar. That is, while backing up, if I
shutdown the WIN machine, one I'm backing up, smbclient goes crazy, giving
broken pipe error.
2002 Mar 29
4
Incremental backups and batch mode.
I'm trying to use the rsync algorithm for incremental backups.
After a quick look at rsync I saw the batch mode operations,
and I thought that maybe I can modify them for incremental backups.
What is needed is to add an option to save the checksums of all
the files of the level 0 backup and a second option to use the level n
checksum to calculate the delta batch files for the level n+1
2003 Jun 12
1
questions about librsync
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding
librsync, but couldn't find any others.
I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc
servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make
check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this
might be? Might I need a specific
2005 Sep 30
2
question about librsync : patch function
Hello everybody,
About librsync, does anyone know how to patch the delta without creating
a new file ?
I used the librsync and it always generates a new file, which is
embarrassing if the file is over 1Gb.
I tried to store the new file in RAM, but it saturates the machine.
Is there a possibility to write in the current file to be synchronized,
although this file is currently being
2003 Jan 04
3
directories that change into symlinks
our daily backup is done using the rdiff-backup tool, which in turn
utilizes rsync/librsync to do the actual mirroring work.
a few days ago we did a refactoring and renamed a bunch of directories.
for backward compatibility we maintain the old names by symlinking it to
the new names. so, for example, oldname1/ now becomes newname1/, and
oldname1 is now a symlink to newname1/.
we found that
2002 Feb 01
1
Rcmd Install gives Bad command or file name (PR#1296)
Dear Team,
Don't understand output below. Please advise. Windows98 and
rw1041(patched) from 1/25/02.
Graham Lawrence
C:\>PATH=C:\bin;C:\mingw32;C:\Perl;C:\HtmlWork;C:\R\rw1041\bin;C:\Tcl;C:\Tcl\bin
C:\>Rcmd INSTALL C:\R\lattice_0.4-0.tar.gz
Bad command or file name
C:\>Rcmd
C:\>Rcmd Install
Bad command or file name
C:\>dir C:\R\rw1041\bin
Volume in drive C has no
2011 Jan 24
1
Java implementation - about weak checksum difference
Hi all,
I'm trying a java implementation of rsync for "fun and profits" ;-)
helped by librsync 0.9.7 and jarsync (a died java implementation)
So i started to implement rdiff command and for now i have a working
signature command.
With first test, i had the same signature file of
testsuite/mksum.input/COPYING.sig but when i try with another dummy
file, for each checksum pair :
2006 Feb 22
2
[librsync-users] MD4 second-preimage attack
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, rsync2eran@tromer.org wrote:
> A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and
> librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision
> attacks are known on MD4.
Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost?
--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2009 Jul 15
1
What happened to librsync?
Hi.
It seems that librsync got left by the roadside ... is there anything
similar for rsync 3.x.x?
Or, is there any easy way to use the library routines in the rsync 3.x.x
source independantly?
The only other open source software I've found that looks similar is xdelta,
and it's still beta for v3.x
Thanks,
Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2001 Nov 06
1
rsync for realtime filesystem replication.
Apologies in advance for a kind of long question:
I've written an application called changedfiles
(http://www.bangstate.com/software.html#changedfiles), which consists of two
parts: a linux kernel module that reports all file operations to a device
special, and a userspace daemon which can take arbitray shell action on files
matching regexp rules specified in a config file.
E.G.,
2008 Jun 20
1
problem with rdiff
Hi all.
(I am sending this querry here because it is somehow relating to rsync. If i am wrong please pardon me.)
I am doing following on these windowsXP and Vista.
I am trying to get only incremental backup using "rdiff-backup" (that also uses rsync).
I have installed gcc compiler and by following the steps given in http://katastrophos.net/andre/blog/2005/11/02/rdiff-backup-on-windows/
2003 Aug 09
0
rsync / rdiff in win/dos
Thanks Donovan, I downloaded the librsync 0.9.6 from
sf and it compiled just fine believe it or not in the
new visual studio.net. There where warnings but no
fatal errors and the exe seems to be running just
fine. I've tested it just now on a 60 meg mdb file
that I've been trying to backup.. it seems to work
great!. I even saved the original so I could apply
patches and then file compare
2010 Jun 11
2
Call ended after 31 seconds
Hi people, I have a problem with some extensions. The calls are ended after 31/35 seconds, also, it depends on the number which I call.
This is the log, but I've not been able to find something wrong...
Any ideas?
[Jun 11 15:50:46] DEBUG[26071] app_macro.c: Executed application: ExecIf
[Jun 11 15:50:46] VERBOSE[26071] logger.c: -- Executing [s at macro-dialout-trunk:16]
2004 Jun 23
8
[Bug 884] DSA keys (id_dsa.pub) with 8192 bits or more aren't correctly recognized
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=884
dmr at gmx.it changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|DSA keys (id_dsa.pub) with |DSA keys (id_dsa.pub) with
|8192 bytes or more aren't |8192 bits or more aren't
|correctly