Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Re: problems with win 2k (Cristi S)"
2003 Mar 12
1
Samba BDC and secrets.tdb question
I have a question about setting up a samba BDC
(with a samba PDC).
I am running Samba as the PDC on a small network.
Other Unix boxes on the network are running
with:
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
update encrypted = Yes
password server = 192.168.1.5
So they make use of the PDC for smbmount and smbsh
applications. The W2K box also uses Samba at the PDC.
I want to set up a Redhat
2002 Jan 03
0
Configure parameters for Redhat Linux 7.1
Redhat Linux will install and configure Samba
Currently 2.2.1a.
The pieces are not placed in /usr/local/samba/...
Does anyone have the configure parameters that would
allow a "make install" of Samba 2.2.2 to put
everything in the right place?
I could not find this in the archives.
Also, it appears smbsh is still broke in
Samba 2.2.1 for Redhat 7.2. Is this known
to be the case?
2001 Nov 28
0
SAMBA and network security (Try 2 without HTML)
I did not mean to send the previous question in HTML.
I wish to solicit information and comments.
I am attempting to convince our ITS department to
create trust accounts for the Samba server nodes on
some of our lab machines which sit across an internal firewall
from the corporate network. My purpose is to access
UNIX files on the samba servers from PC's connected
to the corporate lan.
2005 Aug 31
2
Wine - Broderbund Print Shop - printing
I am running wine 20050725.
I used winetools to get an assortment
of software loaded and with a bit of tweeking
it worked.
I then ran the install CD for Broderbund
"The Print Shop". It loaded OK and after
copying a few dll's from my windows box, it
came up and ran.
My problem is with printing.
After reading through the users guide on printing
and poking around in the archives
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and
log.nmbd are empty.
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865)
Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08
13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876)
sesssetupX:name=[administrator]
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and
log.nmbd are empty.
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865)
Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08
13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876)
sesssetupX:name=[administrator]
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC.
So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be
trying to track the failure in that code?
In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows:
libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000)
libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000)
libc.so.6 =>
2003 Jan 30
3
Smbmount for Solaris 8?
I see that smbmount is for Linux only. I have a need for a Solaris 8
Sun to see a Win2k shared volume, currently as read-only. So I have a
few questions:
- Is there a read-only capability of smbmount for Solaris 8?
- Is there a Solaris 8 version of smbmount in development? Is
so, when would it be released?
- Can you name any commercial packages that offer the ability to
mount NTFS file
2002 Jul 15
3
Controlling Samba with xinetd
Hi all
Just a query from a fellow tech who's playing with Samba.
He just asked me the following question, it's something I've
never really thought of, but on the face of it could be worth
further investigation.
Any thoughts??
TIA
<snip>
Was doing some research last night on high availablilty -
led me to a thought which I have seen around before but
decided it was not
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
cheers, jerry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com
www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org
www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org
--"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Return-Path:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
and that access to the client should be denied.
> James
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com>
> To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM
> Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client?
>
>
> > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by
2010 Feb 07
2
problems with samba share
Hi everyone,
I want to achieve the following setup:
- have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users;
- have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user.
This is running on debian lenny, samba 3.2.5.
My smb.conf is as follows:
[global]
workgroup = WORKGROUP
netbios name = cast
remote announce = 192.168.1.99/WORKGROUP
server string = %h
2017 Feb 09
2
mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error
> Hello Bob,
> looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look
> how it goes.
> Sincerely
> AndyBe
Hello AndyBe,
I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is the same symptom as when it
2017 Apr 05
1
Xorg problem
I was also successful with 7 computers, however they run version 6.7.
For some reason this one computer upgraded to 6.8 and Xorg does not work.
I also changed to 3 different terminals and it did not help.
I am not giving up yet.
Thanks
Shoshana
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Styma, Robert (Nokia - US/Phoenix) <
robert.styma at nokia.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for responding. I
2009 Dec 01
4
[Bug 1678] New: Insufficient privileges to chroot() on AIX
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678
Summary: Insufficient privileges to chroot() on AIX
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.3p1
Platform: PPC
OS/Version: AIX
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy:
2017 Apr 04
3
Xorg problem
Thanks for responding. I really don't know why I have the problem
my computer is a Dell computer with the standard parts.
I am not sure that your fix will work for me.
I am using the computer remotely and am still looking for a
solution.
Thanks
Shoshana
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Styma, Robert (Nokia - US/Phoenix) <
robert.styma at nokia.com> wrote:
> > I updated to Centos
2017 Feb 09
1
mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error
Styma, Robert (Nokia - US) wrote:
>>
>>> looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look
>>> how it goes.
>> I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all
>> the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting
>> Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is
2017 Feb 08
0
mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error
Hello Bob,
looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look
how it goes.
Sincerely
AndyBe
Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2017, 17:40 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia -
US):
> I am loading a server from the CentOS 6.7 ISO and then upgrading. After loading at release 6.7, the machine behaves normally. After running yum update, the X server will not start. Attempts to
2017 Feb 10
0
mach64 driver, latest update in CentOS 6.8, symbol lookup error
Hello Bob,
while im test something with samba, install an old centos 6.4 and
updated it.
before i move the virual machine into trash, here are the rebuilt driver
without any modification.
http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/6/
The prelink problem should be gone - hopefully.
Sincerely
AndyBe
Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2017, 17:40 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia -
US):
> I am loading a server
2017 Mar 20
2
Need help
I am also using CentOS, but to get a bug fixed, you have to go upstream to RedHat. I think John Pierce is right, I had to change my run level to get the alternate consoles to work. I still have the machine at run level 3 hoping that a bug fix lets me go back to run level 5. Other machines work fine, just the 2 with the MACH64 video on the motherboard will no longer run X.
Bob S.