Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Solaris binary distribution question /usr/local"
2002 Dec 04
2
Is Redhat / Samba the only combination that can authenticate to a n NT domain??
I have 2.2.2 on a RedHat box authenticating to an NT server quite nicely but
I'd really like to put it on my SUN Solaris servers. Has Samba come that
far yet or are there plans to?
Thanks,
Trevor.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2003 Oct 01
2
Hep for creating a package
Hi,
I created a package for OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 in UNIX (OS: Sun Solaris), the
newly created package includes binaries,man pages, libraries and
Configuration files. I am planning to install this package in all of
my Sun server's (Approximately 200 Server's).
We have SSH/OpenSSH older version are already installed and running in
all of the sun boxes. I want to install the
2002 Apr 25
2
ssh-rand-helper probs
Hi all
Am i doing this right? Is this the right list to post to? If not, a
quick lesson in ettiquette for me would not hurt. As I am both just
starting to use newsgroups and SSH, I am not entirely familiar with the
processes. I have a question about ssh-rand-helper. First an outline: I
am currently using the SSH packages for Solaris 2.8 available at
sunfreeware.com. The environment is
2001 Dec 20
3
OpenSSH-sparc-3.0.2p1.pkg: /usr/local conflicting file
Hi,
Trying to install the Solaris package I made after configure/compilation
under Solaris 8.
My configure settings
---------------------
OpenSSH has been configured with the following options:
User binaries: /usr/local/bin
System binaries: /usr/local/sbin
Configuration files: /usr/local/etc
Askpass program: /usr/local/libexec/ssh-askpass
2001 Mar 01
5
Configuring Samba
I am still having some troubles getting samba to work.
I have installed samba and it seems to be fine from the server point of
view. However, my client can see the server in the Network neighborhood,
but I get network path not found.
The server and the client are on different sub-nets.
Both the client and the server are using DNS to resolve names. Both are
resolvable. They use FTP between
2002 Dec 11
3
2 gigabyte issue
I am running RedHat8, samba 2.2.7
The mailing list archives seem to pin the 2gb problem on several
unrelated issues (all of which i explored).
The machines in question have no problems creating 2+gb files locally
and via NFS.
Is this an issue with smbfs? smbmount?
anyone have a workaround?
--
'As we enjoy great Advantages from the Inventions of others we should
be glad of an Opportunity
2003 Jul 31
2
Vanishing Permissions on Shares
I am trying to move our network from windows NT-2k to Samba /Linux.
So far everything is great but there is one main obstacle; when I apply
permissions to a Samba share via my W2K workstation, the permissions
instantly disappear.
This happens regardless of the owner / creator of file or the user / group
permission I attempt to add.
I have run 2.2.7, 2.2.8, and now 3.0 beta3. All three behave
2002 Feb 15
1
"ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_ winbind.so.1: symbol socket: referenced symbol not found" - Samba Team?
Hey,
I'm getting this error when ever I've written a file from my Win2k Pro
machine to my samba share. Using Samba 2.2.3. Built on Solaris 8. Using
winbindd. I created the sym links as suggested under /lib (really
/usr/lib): nss_winbind.so.1 -> libnss_winbind.so nss_winbind.so.2 ->
libnss_winbind.so
Are there some other sim links I need somewhere or is this error something
2002 Feb 15
3
Samba Team? - "ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1: symbol socket: referenced symbol not foun d"
I've recompiled samba 2.2.3a and still any time I do a ls -l in a directory
where there are files from a PC I get the error :
ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1: symbol
socket: referenced symbol not found
If I shut off winbind or take winbind out for my /etc/nsswitch.conf file, I
can get a directory listing and it lists the users ID that winbind assigned
to
2005 May 12
2
Solaris 10 on amd and R-2.1.0
Hi
I am having problems compiling R on a Solaris 10 opteron box we have on
trial.
checking for Fortran libraries of g77... -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/lib -
L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.3.2 -
L/usr/ccs/bin -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-
solaris2.10/3.3.2/../../.. -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s -lfrtbegin: -
lg2c:
checking how to get verbose linking output from
2002 Feb 15
2
Samba Team? - "ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1: symbol socket: referenced symbol not fou n d"
You can test if winbind is able to resolve user IDs internally with "wbinfo
-u". This uses the samba tool "wbinfo" to connect directly to the running
winbind daemon and list all the Windows domain users. If that fails, then
you have problems with the winbind daemon itself. The authentication between
winbind and the PDC can be tested with "wbinfo -t", which is usually
2007 Oct 30
2
[osol-help] Squid Cache on a ZFS file system
On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <teklimbu at wlink.com.np> wrote:
> I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being
> the partition for the Squid cache:
>
> 18:51:27 root at solaris:~$ zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> mypool 478M 31.0G 10.0M /mypool
> mypool/cache 230M 9.78G 230M
2002 Dec 09
3
smbclient returns incorrect file size for large files
When I connect to a share on an NTFS drive on a Windows 2000 server using smbclient and obtain a directory listing using the 'ls' command, the file size of large files is shown as 259190784. This is not the size of the file according to the Windows GUI which gives 8,849,125,376 bytes (8.24 GB) as the file size.
I have not been able to determine exactly how big a file has to be for the
2002 Nov 29
3
Version 2.2.6 and above are not able to store big fil es over 2GB
I'm hitting the 2G limit taring from 2.2.2 to ntfs NT4.
could this be my problem as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of Klaus Ethgen
Sent: 29 November 2002 4:10 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Version 2.2.6 and above are not able to store big files
over 2GB
Hello,
when I store a file biger than
1999 Mar 23
2
Print Command not working
Hi there,
I'm having an unusual problem.
We are running Samba 1.9.18p8 on an Intel PII running Unixware 2.1.2.
Recently recently we've been seeing problems with samba printing.
We've narrowed it down to a problem with the "Print Command" function in
smb.conf.
At some point, whatever is configured as the "Print Command", never gets
executed. Even if the print
2002 Dec 11
2
Samba 2.2.7a released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 2.2.7a.
This is the latest stable release of Samba and the version that all
production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes.
The source code can be downloaded from :
http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/
in the file samba-2.2.7a.tar.gz or samba-2.2.7a.tar.bz2.
Both
2002 Dec 11
2
Samba 2.2.7a released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 2.2.7a.
This is the latest stable release of Samba and the version that all
production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes.
The source code can be downloaded from :
http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/
in the file samba-2.2.7a.tar.gz or samba-2.2.7a.tar.bz2.
Both
2002 May 16
7
Name Resolution, Pinging
I am running redhat 7.3 with Samba 2.2.4. I was
wondering if there was a way to use Samba to resolve
my IPs instead of having to add all the entries to my
/etc/hosts file? For instance, I would like to be able
to do `ping acormany` instead of `ping <IP Address>`.
We are currently using WINS on a Windows box to
resolve the IPs. As of right now, I can `ping
acormany` on a Windows system, but
1998 Jun 14
1
Binary Releases - Samba-1.9.18p8
The Samba-Team is pleased to make known that binary packages for
samba-1.9.18p8 are now available for:
Red Hat Linux 4.2, 5.0 and 5.1 (Intel)
Red Hat Linux 5.1 (alpha)
Caldera Open Linux 1.2 (Intel)
Sun Solaris x86 2.6
SCO Open Server 5.04
Slackware Linux 3.4
Digital Alpha Unix 4.0d (OSF1)
We are hoping that others will contribute binary files for the remaining
major platforms will be available
2001 Mar 28
3
OSSH 2.5.2p2: Why is /usr/local/ put into the include & lib paths under Solaris?
I'd like to know why /usr/local/(include|lib) is added to the
(include|library) path. I'd _especially_ like to know why it's added before
user-specified library directories such as OpenSSL. If I specify
--with-openssl=/foo/openssl, I want to actually _use_ the version of
openssl in /foo/openssl, not some version that may have been installed in
/usr/local. This really makes no