similar to: RE: problems with inherit permissions (Armin Baumgaertner)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "RE: problems with inherit permissions (Armin Baumgaertner)"

2003 Jan 09
1
problems with inherit permissions
Hello, i'm using samba 2.0.7 with solaris 7 i would like to use the 'inherit permissions' - option. smb.conf [test] comment = TEST path = /test writeable = Yes inherit permissions = Yes UNIX-FS: mkdir /test chmod 777 /test chmod g+s /test ls -ld /test drwxrwsrwx ..... test If i create a new directory /test/xxx from unix-prompt, the new directory
2004 Nov 12
1
libldap is needed for LDAP support
I am having a problem running configure, under Solaris 9. I get the above error message. I get this problem, with both 3.0.7 and 3.0.8. The command I am running is : ./configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --sysconfdir=/etc/sfw --with-smbwrapper --with-acl-support --w ith-ldap --with-ldapsam --with-ads --with-krb5=/usr/lib/krb5 I get this with the Sun ldap libraries (which I asummme are OpenLDAP by
2004 Nov 17
0
Problem with joining Active Server Domain
I have built samba 3.0.8 with ADS support. From the Solaris 9 end it appeared to join the active directory server domain OK. However when I look using Windows Explorer on the ADS (Windows 2003) machine it appears as Samba 3.0.8 server under WORKGROUP, and I cannot access the shares. I am using the MIT kerberos. The Howto guide on page 74 is a bit ambiguous. I read it to say that if you are
2013 May 03
0
dovecot 1.2.5 Fatal: setgid(5000(vmail)) Operation not permitted
This is the error I'm getting (whenever i recieve and email): *deliver() : Fatal: setgid(5000(vmail)) failed with euid=5000(vmail), gid=8(mail), egid=8(mail): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process group set to 5000(vmail) instead of 8(mail)) * I am at loss. I have tried "everything" i could think of (besides purging the machine and do it all
2018 Jan 15
0
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
Somewhere between Samba 4.2.10 and 4.6.2 (came with CentOS 7 updates) the setgid bit is not inherited anymore when making directories via my Samba service. Everything else is still fine. With ssh direct on the file system or sftp, i get all permissions and acls inherited nicely. Also with Samba all acls are still just fine, except that setgid bit is not inherited (s on the group executable
2018 Feb 05
0
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
Hi Lorenzo and Dale, My setup is like Lorenzo's completely based on setgid being propagated. The filesystem should determine the group used starting at a certain directory. Different "root" directories have different groups, and security is based on groups, not users. I tried all sorts of settings combinations, alseo "force directory mode = 2770", but none propagates
2006 Feb 22
1
inherit groups?
I'm wondering if there is a better way of doing this. Right now we have a share (ShareA) with three sub directories in it (Dir1, Dir2, Dir3) that have specific groups set for each directory. We would like to have newly created files and/or directories inherit the parent directories group. Right now were using SETGID bit to accomplish this. Is there a better way to accomplish this via
2018 Feb 02
2
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a
2000 May 22
1
Inherit Permissions addition
Gentlemen, I was delighted to read about and test the "inherit permissions" feature of version 2.0.7 for myself. This is a wonderful addition to Samba; thank you, David Lee, for your fine work. After initial testing, it became apparent to me that inheriting the 'group' permissions on a subfolder within a share without also 'forcing' the group ownership on the new files
2006 Sep 30
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4138] New: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138 Summary: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2004 Jul 19
2
Mac OS X installer: missing files fix
I've paraphrased the OS X installer developer's comments: there's a bug in Installer that is preventing the archive from working right. Below is the fix for the problem. First (obviously) run the installer. Since the executables are in the archive.pax.gz file in the installer package, first do a "show package contents" on the package file, then unstuff the enclosed
2007 Oct 08
0
ACL inherit and windows folder security settings
We have the following share: [users] path = /home read only = No inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes inherit owner = yes the /home permissions are: drwxr-xr-x ... root root ... /home There are /home/user1, /home/user2, ... folders. When they are created their permissions are set like this: drwx--Sr-x ... user1 "Domain Users" ...
2007 Nov 20
4
SETGID not being inherited
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have an Debian system running samba 3.0.14a from sarge. It is exporting a file system, /data. This file system has the perms 2770. I have set the following in the smb.conf: inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes I mount the filesystem from a linux, ubuntu, client and create a directory. The directory comes out with perms 0770. I can
2002 Aug 16
3
IPC$ service
We use samba purely as for file serving from Solaris 7 or 8 servers. THE PDC and BDCs are NT machines. We have been using Samba 2.0.7, but used 2.2.5 for a new server. One noticeable difference is that smbstatus lists a number of entries "IPC$ nobody nobody" which we did not see in 2.0.7. Is this normal in 2.2.5 or something I should be ivestigating? Eg trout# smbstatus
2010 Jun 23
0
Directory Permissions?
Hello, Running Samba 3.3.10 on FreeBSD 7.3. Cannot copy a folder with a subfolder and 10 files in the subfolder from an OSX 10.6.4 client to a folder on the Samba server. What happens is that the folder gets copied but not the subfolder and its files. root at aries:/usr/local/etc# testparm Load smb config files from /usr/local/etc/smb.conf Processing section "[homes]" Processing
2003 Aug 21
1
login on homes share despite available = no
Hi! Today I found that a user can successfully login on a homes share despite that share should be disabled. To quote smb.conf(1): available (S) This parameter lets you "turn off" a service. If avail- able = no, then ALL attempts to connect to the service will fail. Such failures are logged. However, see the following: % walter@qdevel2:/home/walter> smbclient
2004 Jul 19
1
MAC OS X Panther :?
Just wondering if anyone has tried MAC OS X and panther. I will like to do SIP to H323, not sure if this will be possible on the MAC because of the Libraries PWlib and OPenh32 for Linux.. Just curious.. Anyway, anyone has an easy guide (step by step) to setup oh323 with asterisk. I saw a guide but i am not very savy on linux. thanks, Francisco ----- Original Message ----- From:
2008 Jun 19
0
struggling with simple webdav
Normally I use authzldap to authenticate LDAP users but in this case, I have a client that wants non-LDAP users to be able to use DAV. The twist is that there are several virtual hosts on this server and perhaps that is confusing things... anyway, my httpd.conf has... <Location /webdav> Dav On AllowOverride None Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AuthType Basic AuthName
2001 Nov 30
0
samba-2.2.2 and Linux 2.2.20 replacing Win2K?
Hi there, I was wondering if you could give me some pointers as to how to get rid of the spooge of microsoft from our office, and have samba-2.2.2 assuming file sharing duties (read this as the Boss isn't happy with all the win2K crashes on the NIC's) The machine is a Pent-III 850Mhz w/256MB, dual NIC's, and 2 HD's (IDE) with /dev/hda1 being where the OS is stored, and /dev/hdb1
2016 Sep 03
0
One host for forwarding only without keys
If you're using StrictSubnets, you will still be fine. StrictSubnets means that A will only use B's key (which C does not know) to send packets to B's statically configured subnets. C cannot impersonate B (as in, take its node name) because it would have to know B's private key to do so, and it cannot impersonate B's subnets because A is using StrictSubnets. The worst that C