Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "RE: problems with inherit permissions (Armin Baumgaertner)"
2003 Jan 09
1
problems with inherit permissions
Hello,
i'm using samba 2.0.7 with solaris 7
i would like to use the 'inherit permissions' - option.
smb.conf
[test]
comment = TEST
path = /test
writeable = Yes
inherit permissions = Yes
UNIX-FS:
mkdir /test
chmod 777 /test
chmod g+s /test
ls -ld /test
drwxrwsrwx ..... test
If i create a new directory /test/xxx from unix-prompt, the new
directory
2004 Nov 12
1
libldap is needed for LDAP support
I am having a problem running configure, under Solaris 9. I get the above
error message. I get this problem, with both 3.0.7 and 3.0.8. The command
I am running is :
./configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --sysconfdir=/etc/sfw --with-smbwrapper
--with-acl-support --w
ith-ldap --with-ldapsam --with-ads --with-krb5=/usr/lib/krb5
I get this with the Sun ldap libraries (which I asummme are OpenLDAP by
2004 Nov 17
0
Problem with joining Active Server Domain
I have built samba 3.0.8 with ADS support. From the Solaris 9 end it
appeared to join the active directory server domain OK. However when I look
using Windows Explorer on the ADS (Windows 2003) machine it appears as Samba
3.0.8 server under WORKGROUP, and I cannot access the shares. I am using
the MIT kerberos. The Howto guide on page 74 is a bit ambiguous. I read it
to say that if you are
2013 May 03
0
dovecot 1.2.5 Fatal: setgid(5000(vmail)) Operation not permitted
This is the error I'm getting (whenever i recieve and email):
*deliver() : Fatal: setgid(5000(vmail)) failed with euid=5000(vmail),
gid=8(mail), egid=8(mail): Operation not permitted (This binary should
probably be called with process group set to 5000(vmail) instead of 8(mail))
*
I am at loss. I have tried "everything" i could think of (besides purging
the machine and do it all
2018 Jan 15
0
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
Somewhere between Samba 4.2.10 and 4.6.2 (came with CentOS 7 updates)
the setgid bit is not inherited anymore when making directories via my
Samba service. Everything else is still fine. With ssh direct on the
file system or sftp, i get all permissions and acls inherited nicely.
Also with Samba all acls are still just fine, except that setgid bit is
not inherited (s on the group executable
2018 Feb 05
0
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
Hi Lorenzo and Dale,
My setup is like Lorenzo's completely based on setgid being propagated.
The filesystem should determine the group used starting at a certain
directory. Different "root" directories have different groups, and
security is based on groups, not users.
I tried all sorts of settings combinations, alseo "force directory mode
= 2770", but none propagates
2006 Feb 22
1
inherit groups?
I'm wondering if there is a better way of doing this.
Right now we have a share (ShareA) with three sub directories in it
(Dir1, Dir2, Dir3) that have specific groups set for each directory. We
would like to have newly created files and/or directories inherit the
parent directories group. Right now were using SETGID bit to
accomplish this.
Is there a better way to accomplish this via
2018 Feb 02
2
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users
denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain
users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to
apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management
using groups
the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by
tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a
2000 May 22
1
Inherit Permissions addition
Gentlemen,
I was delighted to read about and test the "inherit permissions" feature of
version 2.0.7 for myself. This is a wonderful addition to Samba; thank you,
David Lee, for your fine work.
After initial testing, it became apparent to me that inheriting the 'group'
permissions on a subfolder within a share without also 'forcing' the group
ownership on the new files
2006 Sep 30
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4138] New: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138
Summary: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2004 Jul 19
2
Mac OS X installer: missing files fix
I've paraphrased the OS X installer developer's comments: there's a bug in
Installer that is preventing the archive from working right. Below is the
fix for the problem.
First (obviously) run the installer. Since the executables are in the
archive.pax.gz file in the installer package, first do a "show package
contents" on the package file, then unstuff the enclosed
2007 Oct 08
0
ACL inherit and windows folder security settings
We have the following share:
[users]
path = /home
read only = No
inherit acls = yes
inherit permissions = yes
inherit owner = yes
the /home permissions are:
drwxr-xr-x ... root root ... /home
There are /home/user1, /home/user2, ... folders. When they are created
their permissions are set like this:
drwx--Sr-x ... user1 "Domain Users" ...
2007 Nov 20
4
SETGID not being inherited
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have an Debian system running samba 3.0.14a from sarge. It is
exporting a file system, /data. This file system has the perms 2770.
I have set the following in the smb.conf:
inherit permissions = yes
inherit acls = yes
I mount the filesystem from a linux, ubuntu, client and create a
directory. The directory comes out with perms 0770. I can
2002 Aug 16
3
IPC$ service
We use samba purely as for file serving from Solaris 7 or 8 servers. THE
PDC and BDCs are NT machines. We have been using Samba 2.0.7, but used
2.2.5 for a new server. One noticeable difference is that smbstatus lists a
number of entries "IPC$ nobody nobody" which we did not see in
2.0.7. Is this normal in 2.2.5 or something I should be ivestigating?
Eg
trout# smbstatus
2010 Jun 23
0
Directory Permissions?
Hello,
Running Samba 3.3.10 on FreeBSD 7.3.
Cannot copy a folder with a subfolder and 10 files in the subfolder from
an OSX 10.6.4 client to a folder on the Samba server. What happens is
that the folder gets copied but not the subfolder and its files.
root at aries:/usr/local/etc# testparm
Load smb config files from /usr/local/etc/smb.conf
Processing section "[homes]"
Processing
2003 Aug 21
1
login on homes share despite available = no
Hi!
Today I found that a user can successfully login on a homes share despite
that share should be disabled.
To quote smb.conf(1):
available (S)
This parameter lets you "turn off" a service. If avail-
able = no, then ALL attempts to connect to the service
will fail. Such failures are logged.
However, see the following:
% walter@qdevel2:/home/walter> smbclient
2004 Jul 19
1
MAC OS X Panther :?
Just wondering if anyone has tried MAC OS X and panther.
I will like to do SIP to H323, not sure if this will be possible on the MAC
because of the Libraries PWlib and OPenh32 for Linux..
Just curious..
Anyway, anyone has an easy guide (step by step) to setup oh323 with
asterisk. I saw a guide but i am not very savy on linux.
thanks,
Francisco
----- Original Message -----
From:
2008 Jun 19
0
struggling with simple webdav
Normally I use authzldap to authenticate LDAP users but in this case, I
have a client that wants non-LDAP users to be able to use DAV.
The twist is that there are several virtual hosts on this server and
perhaps that is confusing things...
anyway, my httpd.conf has...
<Location /webdav>
Dav On
AllowOverride None
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
AuthType Basic
AuthName
2001 Nov 30
0
samba-2.2.2 and Linux 2.2.20 replacing Win2K?
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could give me some pointers as to how to get rid of the
spooge of microsoft from our office, and have samba-2.2.2 assuming file sharing
duties (read this as the Boss isn't happy with all the win2K crashes on the
NIC's)
The machine is a Pent-III 850Mhz w/256MB, dual NIC's, and 2 HD's (IDE) with
/dev/hda1 being where the OS is stored, and /dev/hdb1
2016 Sep 03
0
One host for forwarding only without keys
If you're using StrictSubnets, you will still be fine. StrictSubnets means
that A will only use B's key (which C does not know) to send packets to B's
statically configured subnets. C cannot impersonate B (as in, take its node
name) because it would have to know B's private key to do so, and it cannot
impersonate B's subnets because A is using StrictSubnets. The worst that C