similar to: Taking ownership of files on NT/2k

I recently ran into a problem accessing Samba shares from SFU. From SFU's /net directory, I could read from files, move files, create directories and even append to files using >>. But, when I tried to create a file, I received a "Permission Denied" message. After looking at the logs I found something which looked out of place. I am currently using (I tried many different

Is anyone else experiencing problems with offline files and folders on Win 2K (SP4)? They are set up OK but when the Win2K machine goes off line and files are modified it won't sync back when back on the network. Error message from the file sync on windows is 'Access denied' (on the server) But I can easily do the overwrite manually so permissions are OK. Below is the log (level 10)

If I try to create a clearcase view on a Windows 2000 Server share then it creates a subdirectory tree. If I try it on a Samba share, it creates the first directory correctly with the right user mapping and permissions and then returns permission denied. I am able to manually create files and directories on the samba share using explorer, so I guess that clearcase must be using some different SMB

Hi list, I'd like to raise the issue discussed in the thread below. I've faced exactly the same problem and came to exactly the same way out - shutdown winbindd and use "force unknown acl user". We use "simple" mapping in the environment - all AD accounts have corresponding NIS accounts (the same name) and the mapping is being done by smbd. The problem here is that

Whenever I try to add or remove a user for access to a file I get the following error: "Unable to save permission change on <filename>. Access is denied". I took a look at my smbd log file and found this: [2002/08/29 10:40:00, 5] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(433) unpack_nt_owners: validating owner_sids. [2002/08/29 10:40:00, 5] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(474)

Hi all I'm having some problems trying to configure ACLs from a Win2000 SP3 client. I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on kernel 2.4.18 (with acl + ext attr), Samba is compiled with acl support etc. Samba is configured with security=domain, and is running with local groups etc rather than thru winbind, I haven't been game enough to tread those waters yet. With the debug level set to 5

Dear all We run Samba 3.5.8 on a Solaris 11 box on top of ZFS We got the impression that the VFS module acl_xattr provides the best way of keeping Windows ACLs. We don't have concurrent NFS or local users so it's Windows only. The clients as well as the Samba server are members of an AD domain. Creating files/directories works as expected and also manipulating permissions for the initial

Hello, I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am not sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified domain GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. Specifying the domain SID seems to work as I would expect. I tested it with Samba shipped by Debian 11 (samba2

At the suggestion of Stas, I'm starting a new thread on this one. This pretty much covers where I'm at right now: Doug, thanks, here's a complete listing of the config file, and some logging, hopefully this will be illuminating to somebody. > Neither of these lines set the log level. Yes, I've been setting it in the init script. When I do ps -ef | grep smbd, I see that

Hi, Search on the net but not getting enough information to resolve the issue. As per suggestion to check the sysvol but mine got issues. Currently using CentOS 8.1.1911 and a compiled samba 4.11.4 based on Fedora 31. I tried also to delete the broken GPO policy E4108E65-68AB-4E2D-9A00-A9063B1558E3 but I can't delete it (using samba-tool gpo del {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 11:38 +0200, mj via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I joined a new samba-4.7 DC to our AD, replicated everything over, then > turned off the old DCs, seized fsmo roles, and added two extra 4.7 DCs. > > Everything above succeeded without warnings, and everything seems to be > running very well finally, except for the sysvolcheck / sysvolreset. > >

Hi folks, I'm using Samba 3beta running on RH 8.0 and I'd like to authentificate against a Microsoft AD. This all works very well, except to the fact that not ALL AD Users are mapped to my Unixbox! When starting getent passwd, my UnixBox shows just my User from passwd and some of the AD User - not all!! Looking through my User with the command wbinfo -u all AD users are shown correctly!

Hi, I'm practising to do a classicupgrade of my samba3 domain. When I run the upgrade, I get this error : unpack_nt_owners: owner sid mapped to uid 0 idmapping sid_to_xid failed for id[0]=S-1-5-32-544: NT_STATUS_NONE_MAPPED unpack_nt_owners: unable to validate group sid. set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_OWNER. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741734,

Question regarding file permissions on Samba 3.0.22: Using a Windows XP client when I attempt to change the file permissions of a directory (or any single file for that matter) once I click the 'OK' button the properties window closes as expected, but upon opening the security permissions tab again I notice the permissions have revented back to how they were beforehand. If I click

Hi folks, I'm using Samba 3beta running on RH 8.0 and I'd like to authentificate against a Microsoft AD. This all works very well, except that not all AD User are mapped to my Unixbox! When starting getent passwd, my UnixBox shoiws just my User from passwd and some of the AD User - not all!! Looking through my User with the command wbinfo -u all AD user are shown correctly! Anybody

Hi, I joined a new samba-4.7 DC to our AD, replicated everything over, then turned off the old DCs, seized fsmo roles, and added two extra 4.7 DCs. Everything above succeeded without warnings, and everything seems to be running very well finally, except for the sysvolcheck / sysvolreset. We're on xfs, and the File System Support checks on the samba wiki page all pass, although at the

I'm trying to upgrade from samba3 -> 4. I ran this command: WORKDIR=/usr/local/mobius /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=$WORKDIR/var --use-xattrs=yes --realm=infinityhealthcare.com $WORKDIR/smb.conf but it failed with the error given in this email's subject. What does it mean, and how do I fix it? This is just another is a growing line of errors that

ClassicUpgrade of my samba3 data to samba4 fails, with this error: ERROR(<class 'passdb.error'>): uncaught exception - Unable to get id for sid Full log of the classicupgrade is at the end of this email. Project member on this list, Andrew Barlett, wrote that the issue is probably that my Samba 3 passdb was passable in an NT 4 DC mode, but is actually 'invalid' :

Hello everyone, I use winbind against a Samba DC for nsswich, and on one client it works perfectly (Samba 3.5.15 on all systems). On another client, everything works except SID_TO_UID (i.e. wbinfo -i, -S ... which breaks directory listings, too). I've now tried to narrow down the problem in a level 10 log, but I need some help interpreting. In log.winbindd, I see the following when

Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in