similar to: Inheriting Group Ownership on File Move

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136 Summary: setgid() deemed to fail for non-suid ssh client on linux if using other than primary group Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.0.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh

Hi Lorenzo and Dale, My setup is like Lorenzo's completely based on setgid being propagated. The filesystem should determine the group used starting at a certain directory. Different "root" directories have different groups, and security is based on groups, not users. I tried all sorts of settings combinations, alseo "force directory mode = 2770", but none propagates

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have an Debian system running samba 3.0.14a from sarge. It is exporting a file system, /data. This file system has the perms 2770. I have set the following in the smb.conf: inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes I mount the filesystem from a linux, ubuntu, client and create a directory. The directory comes out with perms 0770. I can

Hi! I am experiencing troubles concerning the inheritance of the setgid bit if a new mailbox is created with dovecot-lda. If it is created with dovecot/imap, everything works fine. dovecot-lda is called from postfix like this: ---------- mailbox_command = /usr/local/sbin/postfix-lda.sh ---------- logger -p mail.info -t postfix-lda "H: $HOME, S: $SENDER, R: $RECIPIENT, U: $(umask), id:

Hi, I have a problem with my Samba/WinBIND implementation. In folders shared by multiple people the last one to access and modify a file takes ownership of the file and changes the permissions so other users cannot make changes to the same file: [root@atlas PLANNING RECORDS]# cd REGIONAL\ 1\ AIRLINE\ DOCS/ [root@atlas REGIONAL 1 AIRLINE DOCS]# ls -al total 1232 drwxrws---+ 8 root

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:38:31 +0200 Michal via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Samba DM config below. > Directories with setgid: > > $ll /home4/group > total 32 > drwxrws--- 7 NIS\nisadmin NIS\audio 4096 Jul 24 14:14 audio > drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\dok-sprava 4096 Jul 21 09:23 dok-sprava > drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\poj 4096 Jul 23

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138 Summary: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Somewhere between Samba 4.2.10 and 4.6.2 (came with CentOS 7 updates) the setgid bit is not inherited anymore when making directories via my Samba service. Everything else is still fine. With ssh direct on the file system or sftp, i get all permissions and acls inherited nicely. Also with Samba all acls are still just fine, except that setgid bit is not inherited (s on the group executable

I'm seeing behavior that I was hoping somebody could explain. I have a share set up that will be a repository for company-wide data. There are three classes of people who can access it, readers, read/writers, and admins. Readers and read/writers are self explanatory, admins have read/write access, and can change the permissions/ownership of files. Read and write access is controlled by

Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018, 14:38:31 CEST schrieb Michal via samba: > Samba DM config below. > Directories with setgid: > > $ll /home4/group > total 32 > drwxrws--- 7 NIS\nisadmin NIS\audio 4096 Jul 24 14:14 audio > drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\dok-sprava 4096 Jul 21 09:23 dok-sprava > drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\poj 4096 Jul 23 08:38 poj > drwxrwx---

I would expect same permissions as for root mail directory 02770: drwxrws--- 5 newuser mail 4096 Apr 23 19:31 /var/spool/mail/newuser/ Using Dovecot 2.2.34 On 14.05.2018 08:37, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 09.05.2018 12:52, telsch wrote: >> Hello, >> >> the wiki page describe that permission should copied from root mail >> directory >>

thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a

Hello everybody, I have a server with CentOS 6.5 (kernel version 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64) and Samba version 4.2.0pre1-GIT-4daf7d4. I am using this server as a PDC and so far everything is working quite alright. However, I have a problem with permissions of files I want to share. Mostly it is working well. Samba respects group memberships, including supplementary groups, ownership, etc. The

> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 14:10:35 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mike Oswell <oswell@xcert.com> > To: samba@samba.org > Subject: Shares within Shares >... > Is it possible to have a share within a share, or to force group on > directories within a share? You can do the later in (most?) Unixes by turning on setgid for the directory (ie. you don't do it within

Hi! I am using Unix groups to control access to shared mailboxes. This works fine as long as files are not moved between mailboxes that are owned by different groups. The move operation doesn't change group ownership of the mail. Is there a way to force dovecot to e.g. inherit the ownership from the parent folder, not only for new messages bot also for messages moved from one folder to

I use mdbox not maildir: mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%u On 15.05.2018 11:53, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Do you have > > mail_location=maildir:~/mail > > or > > mail_location = maildir:/path/to/whatever/%u > > I tested with latest 2.2 that if I use /path/to, I get correct permissions. > > Aki > > > On 15.05.2018 12:43, telsch wrote: >> I

Hi there, I?ve been trying to get my head around a problem I have with Samba. I?ve set up Samba 3.6.13 on a Raspberry Pi with Arch Linux ARM on it and let it serve a couple of folders from an attached external ext4 drive mounted to /srv/cifs (of course with the "acl" option enabled). I?ve been trying to create a share that is read-writable for all members of a particular UNIX user

Hello! First question I have ever asked here.. and I attribute that to the many people that have documented the crap out of how to do things with Samba.. thanks to all!!? I have a client using Samba 3.6.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.2. There are about 30 shares, 50 users. Not sure how much of this is needed, but it seems pointless to post unless I at least post this: # Auth ?security = user ?encrypt

On 08/11/15 11:53, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-08 at 11:14 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 08/11/15 10:49, Michael Adam wrote: >>> On 2015-11-08 at 09:29 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 07/11/15 23:28, Michael Adam wrote: >>>>> rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. >>>> OK, I know that logins will work on all the samba