similar to: security=user with windows clients

Hi, I have attached a very simple c program, that first does a smbc_init and then a smbc_opendir. The problem: smbc_init return an error (No such file or directory) and then i get a segmentation fault. I don't know what possibly could be the problem. Maybe some of you guys have an idea. I think i have libsmbclient from samba 2.2.7(compiled on my own system) and the rest of the samba stuff is

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

I verified the patch and it compiles all the targets, both in Debug and Release modes. If there is no someone else to keep the MSVC projects files updated, I will try from time to time to update them and to add the new targets. Maybe a note must be put in "docs/GettingStartedVS.html" at the Requirements section that llvm needs now MSVC (Express) 2008 to compile. Razvan -----

I tried to compile on Windows ( using the win32/llvm.sln in MSVC Express 2008 ) the new 2.3 branch and here are the results: 1. I needed to copy the file Configure.exe.embed.manifest to Configure.exe.intermediate.manifest . This is a bug from the previous llvm release (2.2) 2. I copied the file SimplifyLibCalls.cpp from lib/Transforms/Scalar to lib/Transforms/IPO. I think the position of

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium card (X100P). Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ? I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found on

Hi guys, I am trying to compile some files using clang + llvm and I am encountering the following error during the linking step: <inline asm>:1:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'btsw', 'btsl', or 'btsq') bts $14,(%eax) Which basically does not make any sense, because I don't have the mentioned inline assembly in any

On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: >> >> This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a resolution. >> > > Thanks for the link, completely missed

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using llvm, trying to package its compiler with > GCC is a

Add the new MEM_EVENT_REASON_MSR event type. Works similarly to the other register events, except event.gla always contains the MSR address (in addition to event.gfn, which holds the value). MEM_EVENT_REASON_MSR does not honour the HVMPME_onchangeonly bit, as doing so would complicate the hvm_msr_write_intercept() switch-based handling of writes for different MSR addresses, with little added

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a resolution. > Thanks for the link, completely missed when googled the issue. I think no consensus was reached (I cannot find any commit in the repository addressing such

"Razvan Aciu" <admin at kam.ro> writes: [snip] > The problem is with the gcc and binutils licence. This is GPL and [snip] I agree with Owen Anderson on this one (altough IANAL, etc). [snip] > In that respect, if someone can adapt the MASM templates to produce > NASM directives (it is the only thing that needs to be changed), these > updates will be more than

On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > <inline asm>:1:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit > suffix (could be 'btsw', 'btsl', or 'btsq') > bts $14,(%eax) This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a

Hello, I''m interested in establishing a communication channel between the Xen hypervisor and a dom0 userspace application. Ideally this would be a 2-way channel, with the hypervisor asynchronously notifying this application, and then (for certain types of messages) wait for a reply from the userspace consumer. To this end, I''ve been reading xen-devel posts [1], read the

On Nov 20, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: >>> >>> This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I

These are the updated .sln and .vcproj files for building llvm with MSVC 2008. It turned out that the compiling errors were because these projects wasn't updated to reflect the actual status of the llvm files. I checked all the files (removed, moved or added) and now they are ok. It compiles all targets from the first "Build Solution", both for Debug and for Release mode. You need

Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I made some more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I discovered: - from FSF it seems that packaging together a GPL application and a commercial one it is a corner case of licensing. Here is what they say: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

I''ve tried to set up a SAMBA file server that acts completely identical with a Microsoft Windows 2000 or 2003 one. First of all, the problem with the ACI ordering is simple: The Microsoft ACI specification imposes that the DENY ACIs are put on top. It can be solved with a simple chmod. Problem no.2 the Samba NFSv4 ACL module doesn''t interpret owner@, group@, everyone at . While

Hello, Razvan > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make the proprietary application 'derived work'. > - I didn't find any commercial projects (not Operating Systems or > dual-licensed but simple