similar to: Large-scale ACL copying?

I had a similar issue on my Debian box. It seemed that setfacl didn't care for special characters. I changed the separator character to - (dash) instead of + or \ and it worked fine. Good luck! Tom Hallewell Radio Free Asia Washington DC USA > > (offlist replies discontinued due to increasing large number of people > involved) > > Gareth Davies wrote: > >

Hi all, I'm using the latest alpha version (the one that comes with Debian unstable) in domain mode, setting up a member file server, with domain clients authenticating to a W2k machine. I'm trying to use the "add user script" option to create new users automagically, but it never seems to run. The script in this case is a handwritten perl script, and I've added a

Hi all, I'm having trouble making Samba recognise ACLs properly - a W2k client isn't using them fully. I have patched the kernel, recompiled Samba, etc. I've gotten it working to the point where the kernel-side of things seems to work fine (with getfacl, etc). Also, the W2k machine (via Samba) can see the ACL settings that are applied to a file. The problem arises when I try

if i understand correctly, only the owner, and root, can change attributes of a file? thus, even though group members may be given permissions to write, and delete, a file, they cannot change attributes, without the workaround of copying and replacing the file? and do i understand correctly that on winnt and successors, permission to change attributes (eg 'everything' permission) can be

Hi all, The two problems I'm having with ACLs on a W2k domain are still no closer to a solution. To wit, they were: (a) Users accessing the ACL properties dialog on W2k can modify and remove existing ACLs on a given file, but they cannot add new ones (that can only be done with setfacl on the cmdline; the changes are then recognised); (b) In said ACL properties dialog, the usernames

It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd against winbindd to see if it is linking to libacl.so.1? I recently had very similar symptoms running 2.2.7 under Debian and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (this might work best if you put this line before --with-msdfs) --with-acl-support in debian/rules, Plus you have to

You should be able to find the server in W2K's server manager and confirm that it is a trusted member of the Domain. It sounds like smbd isn't linking to the acl libs-have you run ldd to see if you are linking to libacl.so.1? My recent problem was similar and I found that I wasn't compiling against the acl libs. Make sure you have the line (Max said you should have this before

Hi all, I'm trying to use xcopy /o to copy files from a W2k file server to a Samba 2.2.7 box (Samba manually compiled with ACLs). I'm coming up with Access Denied, as documented here: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-June/074548.html I gather that the "force unknown acl users" config option is supposed to fix that, although I haven't had a chance to try it out

Hi all, I'm using the smbcacls command to query a W2k server from a Linux Samba 2.2.7a client. (This is for the script that I'm writing, which I will post soon - I know at least one person was interested...) It all works fine, but it's very slow - it takes about 1 second per file. "Very" in this case is relative, but since I intend to run it on ~150k files... I've

Hi all, I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, ie. mixed mode). I'm also using ACLs. Imagine I have a file on the server with an ownership of DOMAIN+foo (full permission - rwx). I also have a user ACL on that file of DOMAIN+bar, also rwx. This all works fine. I was initially running into a problem

[global] coding system = client code page = 850 code page directory = /var/lib/samba/codepages workgroup = MICROVERSE netbios name = netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = Samba Server %v interfaces = bind interfaces only = No security = USER encrypt passwords = Yes

Sorry about this one being long, and I apologise beforehand if there is something obvious here that I have missed. I am new to creating my own functions in R, and I am uncertain of how they work. I have a data set that I have read into a data frame: > gctable[1:5,] refseq geometry X60_origin X60_terminus length kingdom 1 NC_009484 cir 1790000 773000 3389227 Bacteria 2

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the first reply sent by Geert in > order to actually reply to the OP... What is visible in the

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.36 Severity: wishlist Hello, I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the following errors that do not seem to be important... Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] >> > >> > For some

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Geert Stappers via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 01:06:54AM +0000, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: >> > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:18 PM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> > > I

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the

Supposing I want to use the File decoder., and set the I/O callbacks. How do I do it? The API (version 1.1.2) documentation gives functions to set the ``write``, ``metadata`` and ``error`` callback. What about the ``read``., ``eof``, etc. callbacks. If i'm using the file decoder., can i still use the functions from the stream_decoder_set_* for this? -- Joe Steeve (http://www.joesteeve.org/)

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.37 Severity: normal Hello again, openntpd gives messages like these failry often: Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info for me.

On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 23:14, Josh Coalson wrote: > but all samples in buffer[] are 32-bit signed integers in host > order, regardless of the bits-per-sample of the frame. so to get > them down to shorts (assuming they'll fit), do like: > > FLAC__int32 * LChannel = buffer[0]; > short TempSource = (short)LChannel[LPos]; > > instead of > > LChannel =