similar to: Samba and Windows 2000 Password Authentication

Unless I make a user a member of the printer admin group in the smb.conf file on the Linux Samba Server, on the W2K client the printer will show up as "Access Denied, Unable to Connect". The user can still connect and print to that printer, however. I just want to get rid of that incorrect status message, because it will cause confusion. Here are the relevant parts of the smb.conf

To Samba Users Group: I posted the message below, and a member of the group called me and talked me through the problem. The solution is at the bottom of the page. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Neilson > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:40 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba and Windows 2000 Password Authentication > > Is there a

> To Samba Users Group: > > I posted the message below, and a member of the group called me and talked > me through the problem. The solution is at the bottom of the page. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Neilson > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:40 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba and Windows 2000 Password

I have configured Samba on both a RH Linux 7.2 box and Solaris 8 box and am not able to remove print jobs. The lprm command is not getting called. I know that for a fact because I changed lprm command to equal a script which will log when it is called. And that script is never called. There are no errors in any log files - system or samba. The printing parts of the smb.conf file are:

Hi Sanjoy, Responses inlined… > On May 8, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > [+CC Mehdi, Vedant for the auto upgrade issue] > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> **Method** >> >> Clearly we are going to have to teach

I am attempting to get printing services for Windows 2000 clients working with Samba on a Red Hat 7.2 box. The problem is I can not cancel print jobs (either from a PC or the local smb client). File sharing, and printing other than this problem, work fine. Here is a listing of configuration and system info: 1) the samba packages installed, 2) output of "uname -a", 3) the

Hi Sanjoy, Response/thoughts below... On Aug 19, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com<mailto:sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>> wrote: Hi Daniel, On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Cons: One more attribute to check when implementing a pass that

On Jan 18, 2018, at 10:48 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org<mailto:clattner at nondot.org>> wrote: On Jan 18, 2018, at 7:45 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi all, This change has been reviewed, and appears to be ready to land (review available here if anyone still wants to chime in:

> On Jan 18, 2018, at 7:45 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > This change has been reviewed, and appears to be ready to land (review available here if anyone still wants to chime in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41675 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D41675> ). The process that we’re going to use for landing this will take a few

Good question. AFAIK, the IR-printer doesn’t understand the semantics of parameter attributes. In this case, it only knows that there is an attribute on the parameter that is integer valued (with value 1) and that has the name “align”, so it prints it out. If we don’t want it printing out ‘align 1’ then it’s up to us to not set the alignment parameter attribute to a value if that value would be 1.

Yes, all that is correct. My question is more a long term question: why do the .ll printer specify the alignment if it is equivalent to the default one? That is, it seems the sed script expect the printer to not specify it (this would match the load/store behavior), but the ll-printer does specify it, which either means the printer is not ideal on this case and I should fix it, or in this case

> Hi, > Sorry if this is a stupid question (bit of a newbie). I'm building a Samba > fileserver on a box with a hardware raid array of about 65GB which I'm > hoping to share out to the local LAN . I was wondering if the filesystem > used (ext2,ext3, reiserfs etc) on the partition where the Samba shares > will reside makes much of a difference? I'd obviously like to

I've spent the last 2 days trying to get smbfs to mount via fstab. Using redhat 7.3 and the latest samba as of 7/17/02. I can mount from the command line using smbmount as follows: smbmount //localhost/wwwshare /smbwww -o username=smbuser,password=xxxxxxxx I can not mount from the command line using: mount -t smbfs -o username=smbuser,password=xxxxxxxx //localhost/wwwshare /smbwww The

Hi, I am getting an I/O error while running fsstress on client samba mount point (only with smbfs) Can anyone, please look into this problem? Problem Description: x370 was configured for samba server & x206f as samba client. fsstress was running from two samba mount points from client i.e /SAMBA1 (type cifs) & /SAMBA2 (type smbfs). There was no load generating on /SAMBA2 & hence

Reverted: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314922 On Oct 4, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: + Rui, the patch author Do we know what the oldest glibc which works with this patch is? For context, the most recent REHL 5 ships with glibc 2.5. REHL 6 ships with 2.12 and REHL ships with 2.17. I have evidence

Sorry for all the newbie questions... I could have sworn I saw something about a utility that exports the SAM database from NT into Linux.. seems like it is the lego syndrome, saw it while doing WINBIND searches, can't find it elsewise...anyway...could someone point me in the right direction? I want to export my users from NT to linux with passwords....if that is impossible, I also have all

Thanks, that worked like a charm except for the following: llvm generate: call void @llvm.memcpy.p3i8.p1i8.i64(i8 addrspace(3)* align 1 bitcast ([512 x float] addrspace(3)* @a_scratchpad to i8 addrspace(3)*), i8 addrspace(1)* align 1 %0, i64 2048, i1 false) And we expected: call void @llvm.memcpy.p3i8.p1i8.i64(i8 addrspace(3)* bitcast ([512 x float] addrspace(3)* [[SPM0]] to i8

rpcclient $> adddriver "Windows NT x86" "HP CLJ 8500 - PCL":NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL rpcclient $> adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP CLJ 8500 - PCL":NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL Printer Driver HP CLJ 8500 - PCL successfully installed. rpcclient $> This is HEAD, bang up-to-date. I'm trying to figure it

still digging at this: [2003/01/20 14:26:38, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_connect_system(421) ldap_connect_system: succesful connection to the LDAP server [2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_open(472) The LDAP server is succesful connected [2003/01/20 14:26:38, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_getsampwnam(1573) We don't find this user [Administrator] count=0 [2003/01/20

This patch allows net rpc vampire to create accounts in the same way that smbpasswd does, i.e. it will attempt to use the appropriate account creation function for the backend in use. From reading the comments on the top of the local_password_change function, either I shouldn't be going this route or local_password_change is due for some sort of change in status. The only major caveat I've