similar to: Samba and FlashMX and Photoship

Okay leave it to me to screw crap up! This worked before i started to play with some machine's ip addresses. Now im screwed and its not working at all. I will go through everything i have done from start and hopefully someone can tell me what I need to do to fix it. Please make two notes before you read this, i am not the person who setup the samba server on this linux box(running Debian)

Hi peoples, I have a Samba Server that has had the same config for over 10 months now (read: never had a problem). Just today, I thought, let's Play with Flash MX, so download I did. Start playing around, and went to test my first movie and it came up blank. Not a flash GURU that I am, I was stumped. Anyway. Saved the flash file to my local C:\ (Oh did I mention the WS is Win2k ;) .. and

I just installed wine-20050419 and it's great so far. Dreamweaver works, office2000 works, Adobe photoshop and InDesign 3.0 work great. However both Contribute3.0 and FlashMX do not work. They both have a common error. Flash: fixme:actctx:CreateActCtxW stub! Contribute offers a few more: fixme:win:User32InitializeImmEntryTable (0x19650412): stub fixme:actctx:CreateActCtxW stub!

Before I join all my W2K clients to my 3.0.8-2 Samba server (Debian), I plan to remove "logon path = ..." due to sporatic problems I'm seeing. We're only ~10 regular Windows2000 users, and ~30 VMware Win2K users, so roaming doesn't buy us much. However, it might be helpful if I could enable roaming either by user or by host, particularly with the VMware users. Is

Hello LARTC gurus. I''m new to this list and have a mind boggling problem that I cannot resolve. Let me describe my problem: We have a custom built wireless camera comprised of an IP encoder and a BitsyX running Linux. It communicates to an antenna unit (Bitsyx) which plugs into a Windows machine with a digitial video recorder: [IP Video Encoder] -> [Linux Box 1] - 2Mbit Wireless

Have there been any problems reported with running 2.0.2 on servers using security=server with a 1.9.18p10 DMB? We've run into a situation where I've upgraded 4 of our servers to 2.0.2 but the DMB is still running 1.9.18p10. We have had sporatic trouble with the upgraded servers rejecting correct passwords because the DMB seemingly would not properly validate them. Today, we ran into a

> > Let me guess: The context in which you have the 2 thru n priorities is > the same one as you're using for regcontext right? > > Don't do that, bad things will happen (as you've noticed). > > I'd have to review the code again, but I think what you're seeing is as > a result of this. > > Regards, > - Brad > No, not exactly, I have a

OK this was an easy one to fix. All I had to do is RTFM. Note on the wiki: ATTENTION: Make sure you take a look at bug report 7144 Just do what Kevin said, include the regcontext in whatever static context you have the priority 2 extension and don't make a static regcontext in extension.conf. Let sip module do the rest. Works great. Thanks Guys. JR On 12/5/06, JR Richardson

(Erm, sorry about that...) I was talking about errors of the type: Got 0 bytes. The problem was sporatic, and seemed to be load/speed based. That is, the faster the Linux box, the more errors we had. A look through clitar.c led me to a solution. Currently, clitar.c is written to pad a file with zeros if a file read error occurs. This is normal. All of our errors were of the 0 byte length

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > JR Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:49 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] RE: regcontext,NoOp extension > vanishes when extension reload > > > > > Let me guess: The

Macromedia Studio MX at 76% OFF, Adobe Photoshop at 56% OFF, Office XP Standard at 71% OFF, Adobe Design Collection at 62% OFF Microsoft Visual Studio.NET at 91% OFF, FREE SHIPPING THROUGH APRIL 30, 2003 WITH BELOW CODE. FREE SHIPPING CODE (Ground Only): DKG402 YOU MUST PLACE ORDER BY TELEPHONE AND YOU MUST TELL OUR OPERATOR THAT YOU HAVE A FREE SHIPPING CODE. Dear Students, Teachers,

Using Samba v2.0.10 on a RedHat v7.1 box, I see that the Win98 clients on our network are making sporatic requests for user "nobody" (as shown below). Anyone know what's going on here? My network has both Linux and Win98 clients, but only the Win98 clients are showing this behavior. Both the Linux and Win98 clients access the same shared drives, but only the Win98 clients use

it just says /usr/sbin/swat.new Aborted when i run it from the command line. nothing i can see in the logs... The swat binary from a 2 week old head now (with the rest of the installation from today's head) seems to work okay. what's going on with swat - did i screw up the build? Are others also having problems? (nothing in the marc) brad

I am using Samba Version 2.999+3.0cvs20020906-1 for Debian. I can use it fine FROM windows to access files on my linux computer. These two are the only computers on my workgroup. I am unable to conenct to my Windows XP PRO SP1 computer. Any ideas? When I do smbclient //TENSOR/mp3 -U Administrator I get: added interface ip=192.168.0.102 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Doing

Samba version 2.999+3.0cvs20020906-1 for Debian Somehow the Samba password is aging and is requiring a reset once a month for a couple of users. I can't see anything in the man pages to indicate that the passwords age, so how is Samba doing it, and how do I stop this behavior? One user is on Windows 2000 and the other on Windows XP. The Windows passwords are not aging and neither are

After trying to get WinXP (Pro) to try and find my domain so I can log on I've finally done it, but now when I try and join my WinXP client to the domain, windows asks me to enter the username and password of an account with permission to join the domain. Now which account would this be?? root doesn't work, neither do my other samba users. Do I have to create another user or something?

Hi everyone! I've already deployed samba-2.2.7a-2 and enabled openLDAP support. I now have a machine configured as a domain controller authenticating all windows users via openLDAP. openLDAP is also authenticating all of our linux users. I would like to install Exchange2000 on a windows2000 machine so our windows users can do calendaring (sendmail already handles all of our email needs).

I was wondering if anyone could help me with this one. I am having trouble getting LDAP and samba working properly on my Debian Woody box. I am using OpenLDAP 2.0.27-3 and the unsable packaged Samba version 2.999+3.0 and am using the samba.schema for my LDAP database. Whenever I try to join the network using either W2K or smbclient the LDAP debug log shows that the following filter is being

I am running Samba 3.0 HEAD with LDAP 2.0. I have ldapsam enabled buy when I try to log into my server from a W2K machine I get the following in my error log: sam_password_ok: NO NT password stored for user root. The log file shows that Samba successfully retrieved the root posixAccount record and the log displays some of the data (i.e. home directory) that is stored for root in LDAP. The

I have read over the lists and search the web, I know this question has been asked before, but I've not been able to fix my problem so I'll ask here. I have been successful in joining the XP machine to the domain however it when I try to login to the domain windows instantly kicks up the message: "Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domaincontroller is down or