similar to: SAMBA 2.2.7, compilation errors

On 06/05/2017 11:05 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > I have updated my dovecot proxy servers from 2.2.28 to 2.2.30. Since the upgrade I'm having the error: > > Jun 5 10:54:51 musio12 dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 63632 killed with signal 11 (core not dumped) > > Me too, with # 2.2.30.1 (eebd877): /opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole

On 01/01/2015 05:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: >> On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net> wrote: >>>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of >>>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat >>>> unusual). I'm looking

On 03/11/2015 07:17 AM, E.B. wrote: > > Might be unpredictable caching. Might be the error didn't go away > last time I recreated due to different methods of creating the files. > Who knows, I think I should give up and stop spamming the list > with uneducated guesswork. No - no spam at least for me. Please see the thread with subject "Sieve permissions issue following

On 03/12/2015 12:02 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 3/11/2015 11:10 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Please see the thread with subject >> "Sieve permissions issue following update" >> I tested sucessfully a developper issue last month >> on the hint of Stephan. Yesterday I started to test the currenr RCs. >> >> First I was disappointed, because the error

On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > Hi (Stephan?), > is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of > a redirected mail or simply a bug ? > > A sends mail to B, B redirects to C > C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. > It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces > for various

On 04/23/2018 03:46 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> >> Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >>> Hi (Stephan?), >>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >>> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >>> >>> A sends

Nobody ? :-( On 3/30/20 5:26 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > Hello everybody, > since now I did no replication and spam is delivered into users folder "spambox" > Every night there is a cronjob which deletes spam older than 30 days via something like > ????"find .... -ctime +30 -delete" > Now I'm going to set up replication (two way) and I thought that > doing

Hi Aki, On 4/4/20 8:12 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge .... mail_debug=yes is on on both ends and dovecot was restarted but anyway nothing is logged when I issue "doveadm -Dv expunge " In the shell where I issue the "expunge" I see the following: # /usr/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge

OK, I found a solution: trusted_users = exim:dovecot in my exim.conf fixed it. Anyway this is an important change of behavour between 2.2 und 2.3 In 2.2 the "dovecot" under exims "trusted_users" was not necessary. Olaf On 04/20/2018 02:53 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3

On 05/09/2018 11:10 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 09/05/2018 om 10:17 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt: >> * Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>: >>> >>> Op 08/05/2018 om 10:34 schreef Olaf Hopp: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I had an email with 58 recipients in the "To" and 13 in the "CC" >>>>

Dear collegues, many thanks for your valuable input. Since we are an university GEO-IP blocking is not an option for us. Somestimes I think it should ;-) My "mistake" was that I had just *one* fail2ban filter for both cases: "wrong password" and "unknown user". Now I have two distinct jails: The first one just for "wrong password" and here the findtime,

Hello, I tried to use the new autoexpunge for my Trash folders I had in 15-mailboxes.conf mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash auto = subscribe } (dovecot -n of the original config is below) and added just the line autoexpunge = 1h Just a short period on my test system. But it failed. In the log I see Dec 18 10:54:07 irams2 dovecot: imap(ms2test): Error: Failed to autoexpunge

On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >> >> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C >> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.

Having searched and searched I still haven't found what's the problem with my data (I've attached the relevant file). Every time I tried to use the CANCOR-Function I got error messages. So I turned to check my two sets of variables separately by using the "colMeans"-Function. With one set no problem .. but with the other. My input : > struktur <-

Hello list, I'm trying to setup a small samba4 domain ( 1 DC, 1 member server, 12 Win7 clients) on Ubuntu with the packages shipped with Ubuntu 13.04 (Samba 4.0.0), I also tried on Ubuntu 13.10 (Samba 4.0.3). DC seems to work fine, I can manage users an gpo, clients can join and logon. But I cannot the member server working. My smb.conf: [global] workgroup = VERWALTUNG

Hello everybody, since now I did no replication and spam is delivered into users folder "spambox" Every night there is a cronjob which deletes spam older than 30 days via something like "find .... -ctime +30 -delete" Now I'm going to set up replication (two way) and I thought that doing "rm" is not a good idea. So I modified the job to something like

I have a large computation that performs various bootstrap resampling loops over pairs of samples using lapply(). After a few seconds it stops like this > do.summarize.effects(compute.power=T) ... Error: Unimplemented feature in rep > .Traceback [[1]] [1] "rep(no, length = length(ans))" [[2]] [1] "ifelse(t.howto == \"n\", boot.result, l.meanboot.test(onew.x,

Hi (Stephan?), is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of a redirected mail or simply a bug ? A sends mail to B, B redirects to C C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces for various reasons it goes back to B and A will never know about this. I thick this is came

Hello, i'm trying to backup one of my hosts with a two rsync-scripts, which are mainly just calling on the client side /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender -vlogDtprz --delete-excluded --numeric-ids --exclude-from=/etc/sm-backup/rsync.exclude / and on the server side rsync -avz --numeric-ids -e "ssh -i $key" --delete --delete-excluded rsync@$client:/ $DATA_PATH/$client/daily.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I see some strange errors on a samba-3.0.2a PDC and fileserver running under Linux. Every now and then users are not able to access some random file. Windows tells the user that the "file is already opened" or some similar error message (it's an error message in german) The files are varying, I see all kinds of filenames where