dovecot - Jan 2015 - Sieve permissions issue following update

On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk at
inoc.net> wrote:
>>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times
of
>>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat
>>> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain
your problem.
>>>
>>> To confirm, could you try running sievec again, so that the .svbin
is
>>> actually newer than the .sieve?
>
> If it makes any difference at all...  I only see this using
"dovecot-lda".  If I change my Exim transport to use Dovecot's
LMTP, I do not see this problem.
That is odd.

You can try the latest version. I've added some more debugging regarding
the up-to-date check.
>
> For the record also, the script DOES still execute (the compiled version
that exists), even after the error...
It compiles, so it can be executed. It just cannot store the binary for
future use. So, it will work as normal, but it is not efficient as it
compiles the Sieve script for every incoming message.

Regards,

Stephan.

On 01/01/2015 05:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk at
inoc.net> wrote:
>>>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification
times of
>>>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is
somewhat
>>>> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain
your problem.
>>>>
>>>> To confirm, could you try running sievec again, so that the
.svbin is
>>>> actually newer than the .sieve?
>>
>> If it makes any difference at all...  I only see this using
"dovecot-lda".  If I change my Exim transport to use Dovecot's
LMTP, I do not see this problem.
>
> That is odd.
>
Hi Stephan and Robert,
the same issue here and I'm using Exim with dovecot-lmtp and
not with dovecot-lda.
So it doesn't seem to be a problem of LDA vs. lmtp

Pigeonhole 0.4.5
Dovecot    2.2.15
CentOS     6.6

Regards,
Olaf

-- 
Karlsruher Institut f?r Technologie (KIT)
ATIS - Abt. Technische Infrastruktur, Fakult?t f?r Informatik

Dipl.-Geophys. Olaf Hopp
- Leitung IT-Dienste -

Am Fasanengarten 5, Geb?ude 50.34, Raum 009
76131 Karlsruhe
Telefon: +49 721 608-43973
Fax: +49 721 608-46699
E-Mail: Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu
atis.informatik.kit.edu

www.kit.edu

KIT - Universit?t des Landes Baden-W?rttemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum
in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5214 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150126/beb368e6/attachment.p7s>

On 1/26/2015 3:43 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote:
> On 01/01/2015 05:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
>>> On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor <rblayzor.bulk at
inoc.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your
modification times of
>>>>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is
somewhat
>>>>> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would
explain your
>>>>> problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> To confirm, could you try running sievec again, so that the
.svbin is
>>>>> actually newer than the .sieve?
>>>
>>> If it makes any difference at all...  I only see this using
>>> "dovecot-lda".  If I change my Exim transport to use
Dovecot's LMTP,
>>> I do not see this problem.
>>
>> That is odd.
>>
>
> Hi Stephan and Robert,
> the same issue here and I'm using Exim with dovecot-lmtp and
> not with dovecot-lda.
> So it doesn't seem to be a problem of LDA vs. lmtp
Do you have the opportunity to test this with the latest Mercurial
revision? This adds a bit more debug information on the up-to-date check.

Otherwise, you'll need to wait until the next release is done.

Regards,

Stephan.