similar to: SAMBA slower than MARSNWE...

Here's the deal, I've got a SuSE Linux 8.1 server w/ Samba 2.2.5 running on it. I cannot get an older multi-user database application to perform the correct record locking if it's coming from a drive letter mapped to the samba srvr. This program worked find off the old netware 3.12 srvr that was replaced w/ the new linux box. After many many nights of messing around w/ oplocks

I have an intermittent problem with a database program and the locking mechanism therein. The program is called OPTO and is an older DOS program that has been upgraded to run on any of the windows platforms. I should mention that the entire program, each and every file, is located on the server. I recently installed a new server running SuSE v8.1 and Samba v2.2.5. I've copied all of the

Hi Thomas, Thanks for your kind response! Please review my backport for hs25, thanks a lot! diff -r 3544d85cfe11 src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp --- a/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Thu Jul 19 10:00:36 2018 +0100 +++ b/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Fri Jul 20 10:06:37 2018 +0800 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ // Check whether val is not-null-decoded compressed oop, // i.e. will grab into the base of the heap

Hi Thomas, Looks good. Your changes in loopPredicate.cpp does not match original changes - they miss iff->is_RangeCheck() check [1]. But in JDK8 we did not have specialized RangeCheckNode class in C2. Suggested fix should be fine fro jdk 8u. Reviewed. Please, when sending RFA ( approval request) use original 8174050 bug id. Thanks, Vladimir [1]

Hi HotSpot and LLVM developers, I am building OpenJDK8[1] with LLVM toolchain[2] for mips64el, it failed to build: /home/loongson/jdk8-mips/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp:52:35: error: ordered comparison between pointer and zero ('address' (aka 'unsigned char *') and 'int') if (Universe::narrow_oop_base() > 0) { // Implies UseCompressedOops.

I'm hoping to get some guidance diagnosing intermittent smbd errors that have been cropping up in the last 2 months. They are sporadic, difficult to reproduce, and don't reveal much of a pattern so far except that the majority are generated by a couple of clients, although several clients appear to be affected. Typical symptom on the client is a hang when attempting to look at the share

Hello again! I'm yet again the guy from the blazer_usb problem and the ATCL one too. This time I have a third UPS (the last one In my collection) that i'm trying to make work instead of the ATCL one since there's no driver for it on windows. This UPS is another no-brand box (actually it is a "kozumi", but that's just a rebrand), and apparently it's much more basic

Dovecot 1.2.11, using postfixAdmin 2.3 to manage, basically using the postfixadmin schema and sql queries during install. - If I set a forward for an account to go to a remote email address, no dupes. - If I set a forward for an account to go to an email address on the same system, I get a dupe in the inbox of the second address. So if account1 at domain.com has account2 at domain.com as a

This weekend I upgraded SAMBA from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3a then made it the PDC on our LAN. Original PDC was an NT4 Server. There is a Win2K Server running Citrix Metaframe-XP, and the old NT4 PDC Server was replaced with another Win2K Server to be the Database Server. I didn't want to bother with setting Win2K up as a DNS and DFS/ADS Server (required for being a PDC), so selected to make SAMBA the

Dear All, We have an access database running on a Samba share (Samba version 3.0.10-1.4E) with a gigabit connection to the network. The front end of the databases are on the client machines with linked tables stored in a separate mdb file on the linux server. For some reason the database runs very slowly when it is set up in this way. I tested copying a 10 MB file onto the samba share and it

On 30 January 2014 09:55, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > On 1/29/14 3:40 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> The LLVM Module has an optional target triple and target datalayout. >> Without them, an llvm::DataLayout can't be constructed with meaningful >> data. The benefit to making them optional is to permit optimization that >> would work

On 11/28/2014 9:23 AM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote: > > Is there anything else that I could try, > or do I just have to stay on protocol NT1 > as long as we still use this old software? > > Klaus Try in [global] acl allow execute always=true -- Regards -------------------------------------- Gerald Drouillard Technology Architect Drouillard & Associates, Inc.

Hi, I just install 2.2.2 in a Red Hat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.16 on ext 3 + lvm. The problem are the locks!!!!!! I've 5 users working in .dbf + cdx (foxpro) files with an 16 bits application. It accesses to the files via DAO 2.0. A lot of times in the days the users gets 'currently locked' messages when the application open the dbf's files with read only access! I desactivated the

Our Samba file server has a share with an visual basic application, there are 8 XP clients working with this share. The problem is that connections are very slow when accessing mdb databases... we are using MS Access ODBC to connect to the database on the samba server. Is there any special tuning for make things better? Thanks for the posible answers... -- Javier Cano Flores

I have a file server running with Samba over Debian Sarge 3.1 R1. This File server store MDB and XLS files. Could anybody give me an optimal setup for my samba server (smb.conf). Actually, the performance is very poor. Thanks, Daniel Arjona Net Admin GENCO Distribution Systems http://www.genco.com/ 8740 Robert Fulton Dr Columbia, MD 21046 Ph: 410-872-0875 X12 Fax: 410-872-0877

Hi all I'm trying to use my Cobol aplication with Smba but i'm getting A LOT OF "OPEN" errors... lookslike system is (or isn't) looking files for read/write. Anybody had this problem? PS: this program isn't mine, it's just for my company made by third company.

I work for a company that has a program localy developed, and we were having a problem when we started storing the application on the samba shared drived mabye simular to what you are expereienceing. in ur smb.conf (usuly in /etc/samba/smb.conf) make sure on the shared drive in samba the oplocks are set (example below) ... <insert more smb.conf here> ;================= Clinic

On a PII233 system running linux with ogg-vorbis-RC2, when playing a 2-min 48kbps ogg file, ogg123 takes much more CPU time than XMMS (several seconds with ogg123 vs. less than one second for all XMMS threads added up). Since the pids are the same, I am sure that XMMS did not create new threads when playing one song. I think this has to do with soundcard interaction. <p>--- >8 ----

Hi all, I am attempting to get Sage to support their software if the files are on Samba (Linux). They (like a lot of people I've heard) say "We don't support Linux, Goodbye." even when the client is on Win98/NT. We have been having trouble on a particular site, and they refuse to support Sage Line 50 if the files are on Linux which is absurd, because Linux is much more

Hi fans, i tryed to use samba to share a paradox database which comes with a special trade programs. On a novell server it works fine. But on the samba share I get a corrupted database after some minutes of multi user access. I've tryed some entries in the smb.conf and I think a have a very conservative setting now. I heared of somebody who uses samba successfully with the same application