similar to: Is Redhat / Samba the only combination that can authenticate to a n NT domain??

HI! I am trying to configure the samba 2.2.7 binary from sunfreeware ( package for Solaris 7). Is there any way to override the default install location of /usr/local/samba for the lock files? I do not have access to /usr/local as it is NFS mounted and shared by all Solaris 7 boxes. I can pkgadd to a different root path, and I can -s the config file to the install location, but I cannot

Hi, I created a package for OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 in UNIX (OS: Sun Solaris), the newly created package includes binaries,man pages, libraries and Configuration files. I am planning to install this package in all of my Sun server's (Approximately 200 Server's). We have SSH/OpenSSH older version are already installed and running in all of the sun boxes. I want to install the

Hi all Am i doing this right? Is this the right list to post to? If not, a quick lesson in ettiquette for me would not hurt. As I am both just starting to use newsgroups and SSH, I am not entirely familiar with the processes. I have a question about ssh-rand-helper. First an outline: I am currently using the SSH packages for Solaris 2.8 available at sunfreeware.com. The environment is

I am still having some troubles getting samba to work. I have installed samba and it seems to be fine from the server point of view. However, my client can see the server in the Network neighborhood, but I get network path not found. The server and the client are on different sub-nets. Both the client and the server are using DNS to resolve names. Both are resolvable. They use FTP between

Dear R developers: ... 7: lapply(seq_len(cores), inner.do) 8: FUN(1:3[[3]], ...) 9: sendMaster(try(lapply(X = S, FUN = FUN, ...), silent = TRUE)) Selection: .....................Error in sendMaster(try(lapply(X = S, FUN = FUN, ...), silent = TRUE)) : long vectors not supported yet: memory.c:3100 admittedly, my outcome will be a very big list, with 30,000 elements, each containing data frames

Hi I am having problems compiling R on a Solaris 10 opteron box we have on trial. checking for Fortran libraries of g77... -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/lib - L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.3.2 - L/usr/ccs/bin -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc- solaris2.10/3.3.2/../../.. -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s -lfrtbegin: - lg2c: checking how to get verbose linking output from

On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <teklimbu at wlink.com.np> wrote: > I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being > the partition for the Squid cache: > > 18:51:27 root at solaris:~$ zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > mypool 478M 31.0G 10.0M /mypool > mypool/cache 230M 9.78G 230M

On 05/17/12 11:15, prabu.murugan at emc.com wrote: > > Hi, > > As a security concern we are upgrading samba to 3.4.17. > > I tried all possible option to compile samba 3.4.17 on Solaris 10_U10. > But it is not going through. > > > > User requirement is to compile samba 3.4.17 to support their > application. 3.4.17 is working on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10_U5. But

Is it possible to install a solaris streams package with puppet? As some of my machines are not allowed to be a nfs client, I transfer the bunch of packages to these clients with the file type and puppet:// ... If the packages are in filesystem format there can be hundreds of files within large packages. It takes a huge amount of time to transfer all of them. So I''ve changed them into

Greetings, I have a solaris package stored on a puppet server. I''d like to be able to maintain the package on a client system without having to also keep a copy of the package file on the client system. (think lots and lots of packages) Checksums work okay for noticing changes on the fileserver, but it seems that I have to keep a local copy of the file as well. When I rev the package

I have a minor issue with the 'buildpkg.sh' script in the contrib/solaris directory for OpenSSH (3.4p1 in my case) that I'm hoping might be solvable. First off, I'd like to say that I've been quite happy with the script; for interactive installs, it's worked great. My problem is occurring due to my attempts to make it work non-interac- tively, however, within an init

Hi, I downloaded 3.0.20 from samba.org, ran makepkg.sh to create samba pkg for Solaris. The install base for the new version locates in /opt/samba and the smbd locates in /etc/samba. I tried to modify the makepkg.sh to put everything under /usr/local/samba as follow: Delete: ==== --localstatedir=/var/lib/samba \ --with-piddir=/var/run \

I am trying to get Puppet to push out a Solaris sudo package that I built, but I keep getting errors. I tested applying the package manually outside of Puppet and it works perfectly, but when I attempt to push it out via Puppet it fails. Puppetmaster Version: 0.23.2 [Ubuntu Linux 7.10 - Puppet built from source] Puppet client version: 0.23.0 [Sun Solaris 10 Zone - Puppet built from source] The

any body had any issues with samba on solaris8 ( sparc ) which version is advisable thanks

# cat iddmi.pp class iddmi { # define pkg variable $pkg = $hardwareisa ? { "sparc" => "Iddmi_SunOS_sparc.pkg", "i386" => "Iddmi_SunOS_i386.pkg", default => undef, } $ftpsystems = "ftp.example.net/download" # define path deafult for exec Exec { path =>

OK, I think I've hit a misfeature in samba 3.0(release, Debian/sid) when it comes to using both Samba BDCs and domain trusts. It seems that the domain trust password is stored in the secrets.pdb on the server establishing the trust. This, obviously doesn't facilitate BDCs exercising the trust relationship, or being at all accessable from workstations on the other side of the trust. I

>> You''re right, if the package content from the global zone is >> reflected in all zones, the necessary files are already there. >> >> Typically I try to keep additional installed packages as >> independent as possible. So all additional software packages have >> the following parameters set in the pkginfo file: >> >>

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 7366 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20031015/02b75f40/attachment.ksh

Hi, Trying to install the Solaris package I made after configure/compilation under Solaris 8. My configure settings --------------------- OpenSSH has been configured with the following options: User binaries: /usr/local/bin System binaries: /usr/local/sbin Configuration files: /usr/local/etc Askpass program: /usr/local/libexec/ssh-askpass

Hello, Kenny Cho wrote: >I've been successful using v,1.9.18a but not 2.0.4b, I believe it's because I >ended up downloading the binaries that doesn't have the shadow password support. >So my other question is how do I know if the smb binaries that I download has >that support? This may come across more bitter than I intend it to be. So please take this with a grain