similar to: Problem with Samba 2.2.x - access to files

Hi, I have released a new snapshot of GnuPG, I hope this is one of the last ones before 1.0.2 ;-) This is still a BETA VERSION and not intended for general use. ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/devel/gnupg-1.0.1e.tar.gz (1600k) The usual diff file is also available, but this time there is only a detached signature for this diff file, because I noticed to late that the --not-dash-escaped option

Hi I'm experiencing trouble with a Samba 3.0.7 installation and Windows 2000 Professional clients that lose their network drives after some time. The Samba server is acting as a Domain Controller for a single subnet with about 10 clients (W2k Pro with Service Pack 2-4). At some (random) time after the login the clients all have the same problem: the network drive mappings die (sometimes a

Hi! Jim is right. There is a bug in all GnuPG versions up to 1.0.3: If you have more than one cleartext signature in a file (or pipe that to gpg), gpg does not compare each signature but flags each document as good or bad depending on the first document in the file. This is a very serious bug in gpg's verification function. I have made a snapshot version which corrects this bug available

Excuse me for off topic Can you address me to how can I make some kind of captive portal with shorewall for internet cafe (I just need users first agree with terms of use and after they are gained full internet access). Up to now I use this script http://www.andybev.com/index.php/Using_iptables_and_PHP_to_create_a_captive_portalbut I''d like to switch or tie this with shorewall cause

On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 13:38 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:30:07PM -0500, John Lange wrote: > > I am not a Cisco person; so the question is, is it possible to have one > > of the following: > > > > 1) Have the Cisco authenticate (register) as a SIP client to the > > Asterisk server. This allows me to place the Cisco in its own context. >

We have a client that has a single Wildcard TDM400P with 3 FXO ports on Asterisk 1.0.7. Occasionally the system seems to loose its mind and starts originating calls from that Zap channels that don't exist. The receptionist picks up the phone and nobody is there. This can happen repeatedly over and over again within a few minutes. As far as we can tell these are definitely not real calls as

I've played around with the lightly documented Asterisk voicemail feature whereby a caller can press "*" during the playback of the OGM and be returned to the "a" extension in the context of the voicemail box. No matter what, Asterisk does nothing when you press "*". It does not interrupt the OGM and it certainly does not return to the "a" context.

We are using a Cisco router with a T1 card plugged into a PRI provided by a local telco (Allstream). This Cisco accepts calls and sends them to a couple of servers running Asterisk depending on which number was dialled. But there is a problem. When a call comes in to the Cisco from the PSTN it sends it to the Asterisk server something like this: FROM: 204XXXXXXX@<CISCO IP> TO:

My apologies for the cross-posting. If you are a business or individual providing Voice over IP services in Canada then we encourage you to read this email carefully otherwise please disregard. ----- As you are most likely aware, the CRTC has undertaken the roll of regulating VoIP services in Canada and is currently conducting hearings with the goal of putting in place regulatory requirements

hi! i've got a problem with installing samba 2.2.6 on a HPUX 11.11 - machine: when i unzip and install the samba 2.2.6 and then start configuring ist with "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba" i get the following error: checking configure summary... WARNING: No automated network interface determination ERROR: no seteuid method available configure: error: summary failure. Aborting

Warranty on Accuracy, Precision, Legality, ... of R in Research (These questions may well have been raised.) What is the implied warranty of using R for research & publications, consulting, etc.? Alternately, how does one obtain such a warranty? Your answers will be much appreciated. Perhaps you can point me to some websites which discussed this subject in the past. Thanks & regards

i've got a problem with configuring and installing samba 2.2.6 i've got a hpux 10.20 running on a "I40" hp-risc based machine. when i unzip and untar the installation-file and start configuring it with "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba2" i get the following output: loading cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... no checking for cc... cc checking whether the C