similar to: Limiting User Space on Samba Share

Hello everyone, I upgraded my Samba server on my RHL 7.2 box from 2.2.3a to 2.2.7. Almost immediately afterwards, all of my admin users suddenly were unable to access the printers that were being shared by Samba. Any idea of what is wrong and how to fix it? The messages I'm getting are that I do not have enough rights. I am using a Windows 2000 Server PDC and a lot of Windows XP Pro, and

I am running RHL 7.2 with Samba 2.2.3a using a W2K DC for authentication via winbind. From the linux box, how can I find out which users are currently connected to my box via Samba? This would help a lot when I need to reboot the server or restart the samba service because of changes that need to immediately go into effect. Thanks Kevin Bramblett

Hello everyone, I need to setup some directories (in RHL 7.2 running Samba 2.2.3a w/ W2K PDC) to allow multiple groups, each of which has different permissions. If this can be done on the Linux side, this would be preferred, but if it has to be done in Samba, any help in understanding how to make this happen is appreciated. I know Windows NT/W2K allows multiple groups and I would think Linux

Hi, i had have the same problem with winbindd try this "smbpasswd -j <Dmainname> -r <Windows PDC> -U Administrator%<Password>" Now you should read "Joined Domain <Domain>" Now set the Username and PAssword for winbindd to access the PDC I have used the admin account for this "wbinfo -A Administrator%<Password>" Now try again wbinfo

Hi everyone, I am using Samba 2.2.3a on a Redhat Linux 7.2 Intel server as a printserver on a W2K PDC network. I have a Xerox 440 printer, an HP 4500 PS and an HP 4550 PS printer using my Samba printserver. I am often receiving the following error message: ERROR: syntaxerror OFFENDING COMMAND: STACK: at which point printing stops and the printers start saying TIMEOUT. Sometimes I can reprint

Is there an improved BackupExec Unix agent available that works with Samba? If not, can someone tell me how to work around the lack of the archive bit that Linux has? In particular, RedHat Linux 7.2 is the system I'm looking for help on. I found the following hints in an older version of this newsletter, Samba Digest, Vol. 3, Issue 34, sent March 21, 2003, that had this in it: Yes, we have

Hello everyone, I am having a problem getting Windows XP clients to print to a Xerox DataCenter 440 using Samba as the print server running on Red Hat Linux 7.2. I have installed the driver once and it worked fine. I then tried to add a second XP client, and while it appears to install and work, nothing comes out of the printer. It even seems to disappear at the print server. Any ideas how I

Hello everyone, I am having a problem printing to a Xerox Document Centre 440 ST from XP pro Clients thru my RedHat Linux 7.2 server running Samba 2.2.3a. The XP Clients connect successfully to the printer queue, sends the file, but nothing comes out of the printer. At least for most XP Clients. I have one PC that does print, but that person is also an admin on the Linux box. I know the PCs

Can anyone tell me how I can do a multiple level user share? What I'm having trouble configuring is a share that allows all users to use the first directory of the share, and then in subdirectories of the first directory only allow specified users access. I can't find anything similar in any docs on the internet nor in the O'Reilly Using Samba book. Thanks. Kevin

but I don't understand what to change and where to change it and how to change it, yet. Any documentation available specifically for rhl 7.2 and samba 2.2.3a would be especially welcome. All help is very welcome! Thanks, Kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urban Widmark" <urban@teststation.com> To: "Kevin Bramblett" <kbramblett@dssresearch.com> Cc:

I tried to setup samba to print to a win95 box and I was using lpd from RH7.3 After trying everything I found Cups and looked at the docs and it prints great to the win95 Local Printer. Thanks for your help -- Ron Bramblett Sys Admin Fuller Brush Company

Hi, I would liek to ask the list if any one can explain why there should be a discrepency in the directory sizes that are displayed when I use explorer on Windows. This has been reported to me by a user, I have never seen this before as I dont use windows if I can help it :-)... When I slect properties of a directory it has two enties Size and Size on disk As an example size says 33 bytes, size

I am having difficulties figuring out which group has permissions on directories that I have within a directory. For example, at the command line, I use "ls -l" (without the quotes, of course) to get the following display: drwxrwx--- 3 MIS+psch MIS+Carb 4096 Sep 2 11:10 MyFolder Drwxr-xr-x 3 MIS+dzoo MIS+Carb 4096 May 21 2003 ThatFolder As you can see, MIS+Carb is all I can see, but

can someone confirm this? it does not happen on openbsd. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Florian Wunderlich <fwunderlich at devbrain.de> Subject: Re: fds closed after SIGCHLD bug still in newest version Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:44:17 +0100 Size: 3926 Url:

I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by an open-source solution at the moment. So, I need to do one of the following things: 1.) Run Red Hat

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.protocols.smb as well. Hi, I'm trying to implement file system quotas on a Debian Woody Linux box. My problem is that W2k Explorer silently truncates files when going over quota by copying files. Other applications work as expected and show a "disk full" error message. To me it looks like the

I didn't see anything on the list about this over the holidays and thought it might be of some interest: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/2006-December/msg00049.html Lots of discussion around this topic on the fedora-legacy-list. -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN jay.leafey at mindless.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

I'm trying to install themes for KDE. In doing so, I came across the following web site which seems to have the themes I want as RPMs: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/17/dept/3/idg/User+Interface_Desktop The theme I want is called "Thinkeramik", and it has the following versions, for various Red Hat builds: thinkeramik-3.2.1-1.0.el3.kde.i386.rpm RedHat EL 3

hi, since a few hours i get an error "protocol negotiation failed" "SMB connection failed" while mounting with smbclient //ip-adress/share mount -t smbfs -o username=user,password=pwd //ip-adress/share /mnt/smb the same commands are working since ~1 year via scripts/console ping, nmap, telnet <open_ports>, ... without problems 137/udp open

-----Original Message----- From: Michael Heironimus [mailto:mkh01@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:36 PM To: 'samba@samba.org' Subject: Re: [Samba] Viruses and the list On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:59:07PM -0700, Philip Edelbrock wrote: > I was forced to put a filter (spambayes) on my list (Lm_sensors) to > keep > out most of the garbage. It's really helped