similar to: Samba PDC problem: Please help me avoid a mutiny! :-)

Hi, Quick question. With an old phone system a receptionist receiving a call has 1 button to push to transfer calls to a specific extension, with Asterisk, a receptionist would actually put the caller on hold, pick up another line, call the extension, ask if the person is available, hang up pick up the caller again and transfer. To me it's seems a long way to simply do a receptionist

Full_Name: Richard Simard Version: OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (132.204.25.139) In the random number generator MARSAGLIA_MULTICARRY, your algorithm is different than the one in the original reference that you give in the R manual: Marsaglia in his post to the mailing list {\it sci.stat.math} on September 29, 1997. The last line in the R program has a ^ while Marsaglia's algorithm has

Hi, I am working on a population of an invasive clam. The data are the size of each clam per station (2mm on average). Each station is found at a different distance from a power nuclear station, so at different water temperatures. The fist step I want to do is to identify cohort size at each station or (zone of water temperature). The second step will be to see whether the size or number of

I hope someone can enlighten me on this. Situation: NT network, Samba PDC, about 20 NT 4.0 workstations. log(s).smbd are created per machine for easier analysis (as log.smbd.<NetBios Name>). Not often, but often enough to be of concern, are errors in request_oplock_break that seem to indicate that another smbd process that should be listening for break requests on a UDP socket

Hi, I would like to extract the fitted values from a model using LMER but only for the fix portion of the model and not for the fix and random portion (e.g it is the procedure outpm or outp in SAS). I am aware of the procedure fitted() but I not sure it give the fitted values both for the fixed and random or only the fixed. I looked in the r help and the r list and I haven?t not found much

Dear Samba and Linux list users - Several people have commented on the volume of spam reaching the list. Andrew (the list maintainer, I am but a lowly assistant) has been advised of your comments and will take action if he thinks it's necessary. People wishing to make further comment should do so directly to the list admins and NOT, repeat NOT to the list itself! My thanks to those list

Hello, As I mentionned in a previous mail, I cannot connect to Samba 1.9.18p7 using a basic dos redirector and security set to user. I works with share security level or with the full dos redirector which takes 90 k more precious memory ... I got a answer telling me that the dos basic redirector is a piece of ... because it always encrypt the password, even if instructed to use plain text ...

Hello Jeremy, > OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is > changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems could be pass from the application layers,

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c268c72e77eb82acd082eed5b1ccf341 kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.x86_64.rpm 2d7522f13423c046574e79f47b3fdf2f

> It turns out that the MS Network Client for DOS Basic Redirector _always_ > sends a 24 byte password. So, I guessed at encryption, got 'libdes', > recompiled my smbd (again), found a 'spare' Silicon Graphics server and > installed Encryption on it. (ENCRYPTION.txt is very good). Yep, good guess. All encrypted passwords in SMB are 24 bytes long. The "basic

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1468f8b5a570b76cf202d7890d0b5dab kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm 27073b872577aa31c7229702cd0c118c spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm

Bobby Eshleman wrote: > We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS > requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the > performance of such a setup. > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by > 121% in basic testing. > > Tested as follows. > > Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock

Thanks for telling me that you could not get my message, I hope this work better... so my question was: I built a population matrix to which I applied the fonction eigen in order to find the main parameters about my population. I know that the first eigen value correspond to lambda or exponential growth rate of my population. My problem is that I want to have the 95% confidence interval of the

Hello, I'm new to this list. The NT folk here, are concerned about some timeout errors and stuff that appear in their event viewer. They are building a case to convince management that unless these "samba" errors are fixed, we should move to NT file shares. I think this is a bad idea. Can anyone help me out here. We are running samba 2.0.6 (1st msg) and 2.0.5a (2nd err msg)

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >> >>It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ >>redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, >>per

On 8/21/23 22:55, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >> On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>> OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>> changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >>> >>> It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+

With chan_sip there is the variable SIP_MAX_FORWARDS to set Max-Forwards. This counter is persistant after a redirect. I can't find the equivalent for PJSIP, so I went the way of header manipulation. Only to find out that any headers added to the outbound leg are lost after a redirect (with redirect_method=uri_core (didn't try any other since in the past they didn't work for me)). Am

Tom Dickson (bombcar@bombcar.com) wrote: > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Here is the issue, and why the Samba list is basically unable to do >anything: > >If you send a message to the Samba list, it gets resent to everyone on >the list. This message will contain a FROM: line, showing an email address. Which should be <samba@lists.samba.org>

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >On 8/21/23 22:55, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >>>On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>>>OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>>>changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >>>>

My clients are Windows XP SP1 and SP2, members of a Samba-PDC NT domain (tested 3.0.7 and 3.0.10, same result). Attached is ethereal output of a two packet client-server exchange that takes place when an offline files sync is done. SP1 quickly does this exchange twice - first broadcast, then unicast (as attached) and goes on its way. SP2 tries, pauses many seconds, tries again, finally