similar to: Does Samba 2.2.4 support 64 bit?

Windows 2000 sp2 with Terminal Services and Citrix 1.8 Metaframe as 'client'. --- Problem starts at 40 to 50 users logged on. 7-9 shares mapped at login. Effect is 'access denied' on accessing directories restricted by group access even though user has valid unix /etc/group access. --- Machine SunFire 880 Samba 2.2.4 Configured with "-without-winbind" Solaris 8

Hi all, I've posted a similar message a few weeks ago. I had the 'oplock' problem. I run a linux server with samba (specification below). I get a reply who told me to disable kernel oplocks and oplocks. I did exactly what he told me to do. I hoped it worked... but it did not... From there one i started reading in the archives and followed the 'lock' discussions in this list.

I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no avail. (Like this one http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting before compilation - - ie how to compile samba to a 64 bit application to get more available file

Hi, My setup: RedHat 7.3 PDC server with samba 2.2.7 rpm rebuilt with max connections patch and ldapsam and a few other minor changes, openldap 2.0.23-4. Windows 2000 Terminal Server with SP3, with various pre SP4 updates too. Various Win2K Pro, Win95 OSR2 clients. [homes] comment = Home writable = yes valid users = %S nt acl support = no oplocks = no path = /md3/profiles/%U

I am running Citrix Metaframe XP on Windows 2000 server and would like to have the ability to access files on my AIX Unix server. Are there any issues with Samba in a Windows Terminal Server environment? Thanks, Tim Brooks

"H-disk" share is " /home/%U/disk" User1 H: ---------> /home/user1/disk (h-disk) User2 H: ----------> /home/user2/disk (h-disk) When User1 opens a file "H:Øfoo.doc" and then User2 opens a file on this share with the _same_ name ("H:Øfoo.doc") we get from Word (office programs?): "Foo.doc already opened by another user". When user1

I'm running Solaris 9 Sparc with Dovecot alpha 5 and using maildir format.. I noticed in the log file the following error: dovecot: Dec 20 15:54:18 Error: imap(xxxxxxxx): open(/export/home/xxxxxxxx/mail/.Sent Messages/cur/1135013649.002916.mbox:2,Sab) failed: Too many open files I called the guy and asked him what he was doing... synching his folders. It hung for a while but finally

Good Morning, I recently compiled Samba 2.2.7a as a 64bit executable on Solaris 8. The Solaris 8 server is configured to permit 65535 files to be open, while Samba has been configured to allow 65500 files to be open. These large number of files are required to permit simulataneous compilations to take place a single build server, though there are multiple build servers. Last time I tried to

Hi, i have 2 dovecot imap server running on solaris 10 The primary server with dovecot 1.0.alpha4 is running with best performance on Sun Sparc E4k5 with 8x 450MHz The secondary with rc10 has ugly performanceproblems on Sun E450 wth 4x 450MHz. Every new imap process takes permanent 25% cpu usage List the folder and fetch message are both slowy! Both servers are configred with ldap backend

I'm encountering problems copying files from a Windows NT workstation to a Linux system. Not all of the files are being copied. A week ago I submitted a bug report. The only response was an automated reply acknowledging that the message was received. I'm assuming that they are very busy and have not had time to go through all of the incoming e-mail. Maybe someone here could help, or

Anyone running Dovecot on Solaris, requiring only SSL connections, and servicing thousands of simultaneous users? Our past attempts to do so have failed due to dovecot-auth using up all 256 of its file descriptors. I say 256 since we are limited to that by the 32-bit libraries. We are looking at either compiling Dovecot in 64-bit and letting dovecot-auth file descriptors accumulate (not ideal),

Hi Samba community, Last year we upgraded from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.20b and at the same time switch from NT-domain controller membership to AD membership. After this upgrade we began to experience that drives sometimes were not mapped. We saw this both on our Citrix servers and on our XP PCs. A couple of weeks back we then moved to 3.0.21b in the hope that this misbehaviour would

Hi, If I try to transfer about 27.000 small HTML-Files from my Windows-PC to our central SAMBA-Server I'll get massive performance problems. First the performance looks ok but after a time period of 3 minutes it goes slow down - appr. one file per second will be transferred. Has anyone an idea what I can tune to avoid this annoying behaviour. My samba server configuration: - OS: Solaris 8

Email eller vedhæftet fil afsendt fra din adresse (eller med din adresse som afsender) er blevet afvist fra Allerød Kommune. Spam og virus bliver typisk sendt under dække af andre afsendere og den blokerede email behøver derfor ikke oprinde direkte fra dig. (Husk dog altid at have et opdateret antivirusprogram på din computer.) Du kan evt. scanne din computer med det gratis' værktøj

We're trying to use samba to let our PC's mount view extended pathnames used by clearcase but they show up as empty. If anyone's used samba and Clear Case (by Pure Atria) and gotten it to work I'd love to hear how. thanks, Bill -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Schwartz email: whschwartz@mmm.com System

I have a SAMBA Server utilizing an LDAP backend for user authentication and it works great unless I use ClearCase. When ClearCase is used the compilation time for our code is slowed down to a crawl and the ClearCase application is rendered nearly useless. As a test fix my boss wants me to create a second SAMBA server to be used for only the ClearCase server. I don't know if this will work,

This falls under the 'getting clearcase to work with samba' category. Does anybody know if the clearcase albd server actually uses samba to access files (or anything else) on the unix side? I am having 'discussions' with rational (the clearcase people). The nt user running clearcase to access some unix-side views connects to the unix side using a set of credentials that have

FYI:, I'm fairly new to samba (a couple of months now), and have experimented - unsuccessfully - with getting it to work with clearcase. Does anyone have a how-to, or a list of gotcha's for setting up clearcase with samba? Thanks in advance for any information you can send me. Ozzie,

Is there anyone out there successfully using Rational Clearcase with SAMBA? Was there any special changes you had to make to get it to work? We were told by Rational specifically not to use SAMBA and wanted to get the other side. TIA Paul Gilles Navigation Technologies -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef

Andrew, Thank you for your suggestions. The real problem is Rational Technical support. When you pay someone 100k+ they tend to look for any excuse to deem you "unsupported". If you don't have your default group set to the clearcase user group, then technical support will decide that thats where your problem is! I am sure you know how that goes... I have solved problems