similar to: Bug?

Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.

Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.

Sorry but things clear a bit now ;-) i ran out of inodes on the filesystem, which is used by the arkeia database. It would be nice if the kernel loggs this condition a bit more clearly ;-) So i guess this time this "bug" is not the same seen corrupting files a few month before. mfg -- Jens-Uwe Katolla katolla@otris.de otris software AG

While compiling two kernels and untarring a third, my root fs was remounted r/w and I got the following in dmesg (kernel 2.4.19-pre9): EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Aborting journal on device ide0(3,2). ext3_abort called EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal. Remounting filesystem read-only Remounting filesystem read-only

Hi, Subject line says it all. When one of the linux.org.uk machines got rebooted, it performed a full fs check of the main 160GB ext3 partition claiming it contained errors. During the check it found: Deleted inode 142279 has zero dtime. FIXED. The kernel message log contained lots of: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,1)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 We had used up all the available inodes.

Hello, Over the last month or so, I've noticed the following error showing up repeatedly in my system logs under kernel 2.4.18-ac3 and more recently under 2.4.19-rc1: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,3)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 I've now been able to capture the following Oops before the system went down entirely: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611:

hello: I have been reviewin my message slog and have found the following message: Dec 19 06:27:28 server02 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,7)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 What is error 28 and should I be worried about it? Ray Turcotte

Hello all. I'm using RedHat 7.2 now and haven't have any problems until today. I can still boot into the system at this time, but cannot load X at all. I'm getting the following error message when I try to run fsck. /contains a file system with errors, check forced. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks and sizes Error reading block 1277964 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted

I think it was this list that someone had said they were using arkeia. Could that person or anyone for that matter who is using arkeia please contact off list? Sorry if I was mistaken. -m

Hi, I have a server configured as follows: a standard 2.4.18 kernel, IDE discs, 1Gb RAM (not all used), load avg around 1-2. a large partition, formatted reiserfs within large partition are 80 300Mb loopback file systems, formatted ext3. I got the following assertion yesterday which forced a lot of processes into D state. I'm not sure how easy it is to reproduce this problem.

All, I know that there is no official port to Kernel 2.4.4, thus I may not get any help, however I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction for my problem. I am currently forced to use kernel 2.4.4 for reasons out of my control (embedded board). Here are the exact versions of everything I'm running: ExT3 Version: ext3-2.4-0.9.6-248 Util Version: util-linux-2.11f.tar.bz2 e2fs

Hi, I looked though documentation and also checked last 9 months of archives, but could not find the corresponding information. We are having an issue with incremental backup with arkeia. Arkeia checks if ctime/mtime of the file are changed, if so, it backs up. I realized that when I ran rsync from a cammnd line, it changed ctime, and preserved atime of the file in a destination as

Would the following be symptoms of hardware problems or just a corrupt fs? Will fsck tonight when a new power supply is going into the machine. Kernel: 2.4.17 Drive: Maxtor D740X-6L 80GB connected via HPT366 Feb 25 21:26:33 viper kernel: hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 25 21:26:33 viper kernel: hde: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError },

It looks like I need to elaborate further to get a feedback. I checked the rsync source code and it is using utime() to restore atime file attribute. It is fine to change ctime for that transferred file in this case. What we are having problem is that when rsync gets kicked off and transfers one file to the destination, this action changes ctime of "all" files in the same

Hi, I'm looking for common practices for backing up user data to disk. My user data is all in /home. I'm also interested in what folks are doing for things backing up os and configs. Any pointers on setting up rsync, cpio, etc would be appreciated. Pointers to good how-to's especially welcome. Currently we're using Arkeia Network Backup (commercial product with which I am

>> If you're looking to share the tape drive so you ................ >You could probably do something clever with a magic >script in the Samba config, but it still wouldn't >work with native Windows backup utilities. (Are >there native Windows backup utilities that can >access a remote tape drive?) You could probably get >it to work with tar under Cygwin if

I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos complains on boot that fsck.ext3: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) (/dev/sda5) *fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! [fail] If I

Hi. Samba 1.9.15p8 under IRIX 6.1 (yes I know, it's old stuff ...) The susers on Windows 9x/WindowsNT just put their strange file name or directory name (like /usr/people/mesure_?t? ) on the IRIX. However, from the IRIX side, it's impossible toaccess to such files/directory. What's more, my ARkeia backup client stalls on such a name and fouled up my backup database... NB: Oops: for

Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote: >> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to >> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on

I am sorry if you receive it twice. since the mail-list said that i can't send mail to it unless i become one its member. hi, My system will crash when the disk(ext3) is full while i continue to launch 50 proceses to operate files(such as create, rm, mv, ...). Does ext3 have such a capability to stop journaling the changes when it finds there is no space left? or which source file of ext3