similar to: How to let users create/delete files but not dirs

Colleagues, I have encountered a weird problem (FreeBSD 8.2, samba34-3.4.14). A user can create files in a samba share but cannot delete files from it (unless she is the owner of the file). The user is a member of a group with rwx permissions on this directory granted by a Posix ACL entry. The user can create and delete files in the directory from the shell on the file server (which is correct

Hi all, I've got these permissions set on a folder: $ getfacl htdocs # file: htdocs # owner: root # group: users user::rwx group::rwx group:DOMAIN\134htdocs_access:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x The idea being that any users in the "htdocs_access" group in Active Directory will have full access to this "htdocs" folder, without interfering with the real owner/group of the

I have read through that and that's where I'm at now. I cannot understand why I have permissions fighting and the group permissions are being trumped by the owner. Regards Karl -----Original Message----- From: Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Reply-To: Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Group with RWX acl

Hi, the app HasNewVoiceMail can't find my voicemail. This is the errormessage: Dec 3 14:24:01 NOTICE[12222481]: app_hasnewvoicemail.c:104 hasvoicemail_exec: Voice mailbox 25 at /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/default/25/(null) does not exist however this is the output of lspbx:~# ls -l /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/default/25/ total 316 -rwx------ 1 root root 11814 2003-11-22 18:18

Thank you for any help with this: Using xattr so that I can manage a domain joined Samba server share with AD permissions. The underlying OS file perms are 777 and I have set the share with -R a+w to make sure that permissions for owner and group are the same. Getfacl returns: # file: deleteme.txt # owner: root # group: group_access user::rwx group::rwx group:group_access:rwx mask::rwx

Hello, I have noticed some ALC issues with files and directories. I use samba server 3.0.33 on CentOS 4.8 joined to Windows 2003 domain. Everything works fine, all users are authenticated to domain controller. My aim is to give FULL ACCESS (open/read/write/rename/delete..) to directory "testdir" to two users, john and mark without using groups because I have no permissions on domain

Hello folks, Samba 3.5.6 running and I have following share: [public] path = /data/public read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 directory security mask = 0750 vfs object = acl_xattr nt acl support = yes dos filemode = yes My filesystem ext4 which is mounted to /data supports acl,user_xattr and

Hai..   I need to have my home dirs shared over some of my servers. I did setup a nfs4 kerberos base Debian jessie, samba 4.1.17 and sernet samba 4.1.3 on these servers.   This works, i can mount without problems.   But because verything is created with the windows user tools, the owner/Group is root. Like this   Server:   ls -al drwxrwx---+  2 root  root 4096 Sep  4 13:17

For some time I have been using rsync to backup data between different machines and my NAS drive. But within the last 2 days I have found out that rsync is not removing old files from destination - directories renamed or removed from source. In this example I want to sync files on my Debian Linux server to a NAS drive. NAS drive is mounted using smbmount. Using "-avhzn" dry-run it

Hi, the combination of --keep-dirlinks and --delete (--delete-during, --delete-delay) erroneously deletes symlinks to directories on the receiver. With --delete-before and --delete-after it works as expected. (rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version, on Debian Lenny) I don't think that this behaviour is intended. Details/example: - Host 1 directory-structure: drwx------ ./1

On 10/27/2020 12:50 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/10/2020 18:35, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server >> the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in >> my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, >>> = in smbclient) >> $

On 08/01/15 18:37, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > First, I keep forgetting that I need to change the email address to > reply to the mailing list. Sorry about that, everyone. (Hard to follow a > thread that is fragmented like this one now is.) I am focusing to > intently on my problem. > > Rowland, changed to 0755 for the three directories you suggested and >

Hi, I have samba-3.0.13 on linux machine compiled with these parameters: --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.0.13 --enable-cups --with-ldap --with-ldapsam --with-acl-support --with-quotas In smb.conf I defined share : [POBOX] comment = ! path = /data/disk1/pobox guest ok = no writable = yes directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 0000 directory security mask =

Does the libvirt development team have a sense of when/which version of libvirt will support the deletion of live snapshots, incl. the coalesce. With the restriction that you cannot delete the most recent snapshot! Harald -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear All I am facing a strange problem that I could not solve, so, maybe you can help me. Look at this situation: I created a new directory with those ACLs (through Samba using Windows XP) [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl teste #file:teste #owner:1002 #group:1006 user::rwx group::rwx group:suporte:rwx group:administ:rwx mask::rwx other::--- [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl -d teste

Dear UseR, I get an error when I run "R CMD check" on my .tar.gz file package, and I don't understand why since I don't obtain any error with "R CMD check" on the package directory. Do you have any idea ? $ sudo ./R-2.11.0/bin/R CMD check eqtl_1.1.tar.gz and $ sudo ./R-2.11.0/bin/R CMD --check-subdirs=no eqtl_1.1.tar.gz return an Error * checking for working

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

Pisch Tam?s <pischta at gmail.com> ezt ?rta (id?pont: 2019. j?l. 4., Cs, 13:15): > > >OK, I set up Buster RC3 in a VM > Thanks a lot! > > >I could add 'Domain Admins' to the 'Properties' on the share without any > >problem. > :o > > > Back to Buster machine: > > root at dbrc3:~# ls -lad /home/users > > drwxrwx---+ 2 root

Hi. In WinXP I can setup the permission of a file so that a user can modify the file, but he can not delete the file. I wonder if this is posible in Linux + ACL patch + Samba 3.0 compilled with --with-acl? Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py>

Hi, We've just put in a Samba fileserver to replace our windows box for our School District and it seems to be working great. I have a question about defining some specific permissions though. We set up 'Drop boxes' for teachers that kids can drag files into, but they don't have read permission so they can't read each others submitted work. Here's what is looks like on