similar to: Problems with smbd log

Hi all, I appologise in advance if this is a little OT, but I am building a box that will serve as firewall and router for a small ''internet cafe / netcafe'' and am using CentOS... So here it is: What are the best tools to be used for keeping the potential script kiddies from ''harming the Internet'' :) ? I specifically want to be able to detect and prevent

Hi My server has ran out of file descriptors(FDs) a few times since 2.2.5 up to 2.2.6. When looked into the problem I found a lot of smbd processes that had hundreds of open FDs. I am on RH 7.2. Any ideas? I have compiled the sources form SAMBA_2_2 CVS branch from yesterday. usally I just specify the --prefix= parameter to configure before I do make clean;make; make install I also noticed

Hi, I have an NT domain to which I have added a Samba 2 server. I've successfully caused the Samba server to join the domain. My aim is to have shares which anyone in the domain can access without a password. However it is not working; either (a) the Windows 95/98 clients are being prompted for a password (and no password is accepted); or (b) they are getting "The share name was not

On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >> Repo) and it ended with error messages about unmet dependencies in >> regards >> to libldb1. >> > Yes, but did you run 'apt-get update' first ? > >

If I'm not mistaken, the sign or seal hack from samba2.2.3 is broken. Use the newer hack or manually modify your registry. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+creole3=bellsouth.net@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-bounces+creole3=bellsouth.net@lists.samba.org]On > Behalf Of > dominik > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:05 AM > To: samba@lists.samba.org

On 22.09.2019 15:30, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 14:10, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >>>> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >>>> Repo) and it ended with error messages

On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't > think that's necessary. I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7 only, so far. Therefore I believe that e.g. the Windows Update policy is not fit for

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 20:23, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:11:02 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:33:17 +0100 > > > Viktor

On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup

On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> See replies below >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 16/11/15 11:19,

I have an AD with 1 Samba DC and 5 Windows 10 clients. The DC and the clients all have a fixed IPv4 address. In the windows event viewer, I constantly see the following warning: Event 8019, DNS Client Events ------------------------------------------ The system failed to register host (A or AAA) resource records (RRs) for network adapter with settings: Adapter Name: {someGUID} Host Name:

> bugpoint should be a standalone tool. It should not require a separate > script to handle remote execution. Why is the script needed? Bugpoint is a standalone too and does not require any separate script. The script is a helper for using ssh as a remote client. Bugpoint should not be aware of any details how the test program will be delivered to a remote target, get executed there, and

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:33:17 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 17:42, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The problem is that a Samba AD DC

There is nothing wrong with your policies. Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages. I having the same message. ( samba 4.2.5 ) Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Viktor Trojanovic > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2015 15:54 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:

Hai, I suggest you dont remove the "Register DNS" checkbox from the network" option. If you setup if correct, when you join a computer to the domain, It wil automatily registere the computer en the AD DNS. And todo so you need the "Register DNS" checkbox from the network" For example, i use for now an dhcp server ! the DHCP server i use it NOT in any of the MS

Viktor, thanks again! Now that I did this (added the Win10 1511 ADMX files to the central store), I probably will have to recreate the policies that will be applied to Win10 machines, right? Ole On 21.01.2016 17:16, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy > to share some of my findings. > > See

Hai Victor, Sorry for these, i did not know there was still one going on in the ubuntu package. These are known since 26 july.. What i need/want to know here from which version to which version did you upgrade. I'll fix that in the next update. There where 2 things going on here. - one file moved from package. (apt --fix-broken install) - The othere was due to the changes in ldb with

On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Viktor Kutuzov wrote: >> bugpoint should be a standalone tool. It should not require a >> separate >> script to handle remote execution. Why is the script needed? > > Bugpoint is a standalone too and does not require any separate script. > The script is a helper for using ssh as a remote client. Ok. > > Bugpoint should not be aware

Hello Evan, Thanks for looking at the patch. > This should use std::cerr and make sure it is wrapped inside the DEBUG > macro. Will do. > Also, we don't want RemoteRunSafely.sh to be under utils/bugpoint. > Can you move it to test-suite? Are you planning to change the llvm > test suite makefile to make use of RemoteRunSafely.sh? I thought about bugpoint remote mode

Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client objects after the 'leave'? Ole Am 16.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: > > > On 16.11.2015 15:59, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> There is nothing wrong with your policies. >> >> Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages.