similar to: Starting an both port 139 and 445

We encountar a somewhat odd problem. We use pxelinux to boot a linux cluster and when we reboot all 103 of the nodes some of the won't start since the tftp-servere looses the arp-entry _between_ it downloads the pxelinux.0 and the config file! pxelinux doesn't seem to answer the arp-requests either in this phase. We run linux 2.4.22 on the tftp-server which also is dhcp-server and

--Vy1A5eXR7jld12ZH Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="N/GrjenRD+RJfyz+" Content-Disposition: inline --N/GrjenRD+RJfyz+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.8: Version 1.2.8 is a maintainance release, containing dozens of small

This problem has been discussed a number of times, but none of the given solutions seems to work for me. Problem: Trying to generate the infrastructure for testing with Cucumber gives the following error ~/.../OTK-register$ rails generate cucumber:install /home/tpollak/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-3.2.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:251:in

Because of security reasons, my school has blocked tcp port 445 and 139. This make it impossible to for my window xp desktop to the remote samba service on Linux. Although the samba sercie on Linux and change its port by a "-p" option. But windows always look for 445 and 139 port. I've tried a lot of ways to work it out including local port redirection but none of them works. Is

I have an annoying problem I'm hoping to get some guidance on. I am able to use winbind with our local domain, however it does not work with a remote trusted domain (it works fine for a local trusted domain). >From the looks of things, winbind requires port 445 or 139 to be open to the remote domain controllers, which it is not. Apparently these ports are not required for the MS Windows

Hi all, I'm maintaining a small AD system on a computer called "ad" in our small charity, and it has been working fine for a year or so. However, "ad" is very rickety so we got a proper server purchased and now I'm trying to move the AD system over.  I've set up the new server called "org-ad" with Debian 9 and followed the instructions here

Hi, do ports 445 and 139 (incoming) have to be open for the samba server's IP on WinXP client side (all WinXP clients are using netbios over TCP/IP)? F-Secure 7.10 blocks all incoming microsoft-ds (445) and netbios-ssn (139) by default, which ends up in very slow printer-shares behaviour (for example opening the properties or the spool window of a samba-printer takes up to 30 seconds). For

I have been having a heck of a time getting cross subnet browsing to work properly. After MANY hours hunting through source and debug logs, I have FINALLY found the source of my browsing issues. My Samba nmdb properly becomes the LMB for my segment on a WAN. I VPN to my servers at the home office and Samba attempts to sync with the DMB. nmbd properly locates the DMB via WINS over the

I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to listen to both ports simultaneously? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind

# smbd -Fi -d 2 smbd version 3.5.4-62.fc13 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 egid=0 rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE Registered MSG_REQ_DMALLOC_MARK and LOG_CHANGED rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[homes]" Processing section

Hi all, I have shorewall up and running on my system. (GNU-Linux Mandrake 9) When I tested my firewall at grc.com, Shields-Up informs me that ports 113 and 135 are closed and not ''stealthed'' When reading the faq on the Shorewall site I saw that shorewall rejects rather than denys connection requests on ''TCP ports 113, 135, 137 and 139 as well as UDP ports

yo all, i got a generaly question... what is port 445 is needed for , and also, i wonder if samba 2.2.8a supports it..... Thank you, all good pplz :)

Hello, I'm observing slowdown on my network, so I started some tcpdump sessions to see what is happening on my main box, which hosts a samba PDC server, DNS, NTP and SSH servers. viewing those sessions with ethereal, I see that approx 10% of the net traffic is bad packets. Those Packets are tagged 'Bad Checksum'. The whole packets come from the server to the clients, from port

Hello my name is steph i need help in fixing a run time error 445 object doesn't support this action, my wine version is 1.2.2 if any one can help it will be greatly appreciated. ps: to be more exact i was trying to run the chat client Yazak when this error happened.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 Summary: User DCE Credentials do not get forwarded to child session Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.4p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-07 12:20 ------- The attached patch has been corrupted - please attach it (in "diff -u" format) to the bug using the "Create Attachment" link ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-05-15 21:39 ------- I am not sure I understand (my Kerberos knowledge isn't so great): We already set this for Krb5 auth: #ifdef KRB5 if (s->authctxt->krb5_ticket_file) child_set_env(&env, &envsize, "KRB5CCNAME", s->authctxt->krb5_ticket_file);

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2003-05-21 00:49 ------- The existing code only handles the situation where Kerberos credentials are created by the OpenSSH's krb5 code. What would appear to be happening under OSF/1 is that one of the calls used to verify the users login is, as a by-product, creating the credentials

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-02-01 19:54 ------- I tested this with a fake KRB5CCNAME and it worked as expected. Since essentially the same code is already enabled for AIX, I'm going to commit #628 unless someone objects. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the