similar to: RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director

Didn't hear back from anyone regarding if there is a way to determine if I am running the ext3fs with htree. Is there a way I can do it without checking the src code since I am running the precompired redhat kernel with 8.0? Perhaps an entry under /proc somewhere? Pj -----Original Message----- From: Parker Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:34 PM To: 'Andreas Dilger';

Bummer. Does anyone have a url that describes the 2.4 patching process? Any claims on stability? Thanks, Parker -----Original Message----- From: 'Andreas Dilger' [mailto:adilger@clusterfs.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:35 PM To: Parker Johnson Cc: 'ext3-users@redhat.com'; Ops Subject: Re: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies? On Jan 15,

Andreas was kind enough to point out that not neccesarily all ext3fs have htrees ready to go. I am running redhat8.0 out of the box. How can I check if ext3fs with htrees is running? I can download the kernel source, but I don't know what options were used when it was built by redhat. Thanks much for all of your help. -Parker -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Dilger

I am trying to determine the optimal filesystem for accessing large numbers of files (25,000+) in a single directory. I have read that ext3fs uses a sequential search algorithm and wanted to verify that this was still indeed the case since this article was published a year ago. http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154 <http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154&nIdPage=7>

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote : >Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to > ext3-users@redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ext3-users-request@redhat.com > >You can reach the person

Does redhat 9 come with htree optimizations for ext3fs?

>From nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Feb 1 03:51:36 2001 >Return-Path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net> Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-outbound.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.194]) by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id DAA11596 for <jareth@camelot.co.jp>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 03:51:35 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning:

Hi, I've got a Redhat 7.2 system: Celeron 400 512MB RAM 18GB SCSI HD (/boot (ext2fs), / (ext3fs)) 40GB IDE HD (/ (ext3fs)) I run a bunch of services on the box (apache + mod_perl, MYSQL, Samba, etc) but the system is not under heavy load. This system has performance issues reading/writing to the ext3fs filesystems. The performance issues cropped up when I installed Redhat 7.2. Previously

hi, i have a tricky situation here and and don't know where to start with the solution. i happened to set up a linux system, but i had to install the base system on another machine. i used e2fsprogs 1.30-WIP (30-Sep-2002) for this. now the machine is up and running, but i have to use e2fsprogs 1.27 (8-Mar-2002). it's a debian system and i wanted to stay sane & stable, hence using

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5637 Summary: Match case issue on ext3fs and ARM platform Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla@substring.ch

I just booted 2.5-bk current as of last night with the below patch¹ (which was recently posted to ext3-users) that un-static-ifies a struct dx_frame in namei.c. I then did my best torture test for the brelse bug: starting gnus (3600+ nnmh folders² with a total of XXX messages; it does a readdir on each of those folders) while doing bk consistancy checks in 2.5 and/or 2.4 kernel trees. All

Good evening. We have some heavy-loaded servers on ext2, and we want to migrate to ext3fs. But we need full and stable quota support. I have headrd that there are some problems in quota usage under ext3fs. Is it true? Should we decline the ext3 usage as impossible in our servers? We need high-level stability in our server (hosting). Thanks before. -- Best regards,

Hi, I have ext3 installed against the 2.2.19 kernel. I am able to make the ext3 file system and mount it. I am not able to install the ext3fs for kernel-2.4.5 . I am unable to add the ext3 patch to the kernel. In the directory ~andrewm/linux/ext3/, which is the patch for 2.4.5 kernel. ( I can only see the patches for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7 ). Also, is there any prescribed pattern for

On Apr 29, 2004 14:15 +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: > Hello all. I'm writing to all the people in charge of ext3 fs > > Apr 29 12:21:21 arsinoe kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda7): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1071716394, count = 1 You need to run "e2fsck -f /dev/sda7" on the unmounted filesystem. There is some sort of corruption

Simon May <simon@imsl.es> wrote: > We use kernel 2.4.18 with a slackware linux dist. > e2fsprogs version 1.29 > > you will see that sendmail was the application that lead to the error > at the time the machine was doing a weekly new letter to clients > which puts it under abit of load but not a lot really > the machine has a 1 Gb processor and 768 Mb RAM so is

I previously wrote: > Stephen writes: > > I'd much rather fix the buffer.c code. Having journaling try to patch > > up after somebody has deleted its buffer heads is very wrong, since we > > risk the buffer journal lists getting badly corrupted if we allow > > those buffers to be reused. > > > Does the patch below (untested, uncompiled!) work? > >

Hello All, I have been doing some research to find a method to increase the performance of writes to the hard drives in my servers. I am running Samba and all writes to the server hard drives are taking at least 3 to 10 times (It varies) the amount of time it took to write such files on our older Windows NT 4.0 File Server. The following information is provided to keep this issue on track...

Hi, I'm working with Prof. Zadok on versionfs, a stackable versioning file system. I face some problems with the unlink operation on ext3 with htree. On an unlink, I make a copy of the file (version/backup) and unlink the original file. But some files that have been unlinked are "linked back" to another file. For example, on deleting the file 'foo', the file itself is

This maybe early, but is there an ext3fs patch for the 2.4.16 kernel -- also, in general where does one download the lastest ext3fs patches?? I found the 2.4.14 patch a few weeks ago on in the linux.org UK site, but all the patches appear to be taken off that site...Any help would be most appreciated... Thanks, Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, does anybody know if there is an ext3fs patch for kernel 2.4.2-2 that is shipped with redhat 7.1? I was abel to fins patches only for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7. Please try to help ASAP. Best regards, Imad Ossaily.