similar to: Migrating NT files (with users/groups) to Linux Samba with ACL kernel patch.

Hi, all. I compiled Samba 2.2.5 (on Linux) with these optinos: --with-smbmount --with-acl-support --with-ldapsam The compilation went fine and everything seems to be working except for the ACL part. I've applied the ACL patch for Linux 2.4.18 (from acl.bestbits.at) and installed all the tools to go with it. That part works: root@madrid# getfacl /tmp getfacl:

Hi. I want to use ACL on my RH-9.0 box (x86), so I got ext3 ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ and tried to apply it to the kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing

Hi, I've a problem in running configure for samba 2.2.5. I'm using redhat 7.3, with ACL support from http://acl.bestbits.at/. I've tested that the ACL is working on the filesystem, and samba can find it too. Here's the error: checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL

Hi Samba folks, let me first introduce myself. I'm the guy behind <acl.bestbits.at>, the Linux ACL patch. (The other patch at <http://aerobee.informatik.uni-bremen.de/acl_eng.html> seems pretty much history BTW). A lot of work has gone into that project; we're approaching a very stable release soon... Now people keep asking me over and over again about ACL support in Samba.

hi all, i have download the latest verion of samba (2.2.5) and acltools from bestbits. i would use an fileserver with acl support, but i have some problems. after uncompress the tar-archiv i type in the sourcedirectory: ./configure --with-quotas --with-acl-support and i get the following: "checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... (cached) no checking for

Which filesystem supports ACL? Ext2/ext3 with the acl.bestbits.at patch, XFS and what other? Does 2.4.18 supports XFS or do you need a patch for it? What about ACL on XFS? Do you need a patch? Is there any filesystem that supports ACL, that the kernel supports without patches? Any place I can find a comparison of different filesystems with advantage and disadvantage of each? The Filesystems HOWTO

On Nov 11, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: > Done :-) > > The patchset is 532K so I've put it online: > > http://www.nuanti.com/tmp/llvm-api-stability/ > > The bulk edits are split out and noted. They were refactored with an internal tool, so it's not a big hassle to keep this up to date until 3.4 is out the door. > > A handful

On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Karl Heyes wrote: > > > > Any ideas if this is a problem with my xml config in ices or a limitation > > of the program/server? > > Do you have the <yp>1</yp> tags in the instances you want listed? The > default is not to have them listed. > whoa whoa whoa, since when? We've been having a major problem with

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 My users are complaining that to remove "Everyone" permissions from a folder's ACL they have to "Deny" all permissions. This causes a Windows warning to appear: "You have denied everyone access to New Folder. No one will be able to access New Folder and only the owner will be bale to change the permissions. Do you wish to

My Dell server was preloaded with Redhat 7.2 , Linux 2.4.7-10, gccv2.96 with Ext3 file system. I want to install the machine into my company W2k domain using winbind but my Linux kernel does not support the needed ACls. I Does the latest Linux kernel come with ACL support and if so should I just update the kernel to 2.4.19 which I think is the latest production quality kernel? The ACL

To all: I was wondering if there was any talk regarding the possible inclusion into either kernel 2.4.x or 2.5.x of a general and standard ACL interface for file system security. I've used the ACL patch from acl.bestbits.at on ext3 & love it dearly except for the quota issues. Despite those issues I absolutely could not live without ACL's on large file servers with a few hundred or

Helo. I'm running here samba 2.2.4 on redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.17 patched with ACL patches from http://acl.bestbits.at and appropreiate utils. Samba is member of a NT 4 domain. I configured (./configure --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lock --with-configdir=/etc/samba --with-quotas --with-acl-support --with-winbind) and compiled samba with acl support and in smb.conf I

I've upgraded to Samba 3.0 (samba-3.0.0.tar.bz2) from 2.2.7a and I am having troubles with the acl-support. I am running xfs with ACLs enabled and ACLs did work on Samba 2.2.7 I've compiled samba 3 --with-acl-support --with-winbind --with-quotas But I still can't get the ACLs to work. Am I missing something?

On 11/11/2013 19:08, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 11, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com > <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>> wrote: >> Done :-) >> >> The patchset is 532K so I've put it online: >> >> http://www.nuanti.com/tmp/llvm-api-stability/ >> >> The bulk edits are split out and noted. They were refactored with an

Hello, I have today released an initial version of extended attributes and access control lists for ext3 (patch against the 2.4.13-ac3 kernel). Eric Jarman <ejarman@acm.org> has contributed a lot to this effort. Since I'm not very much into the innards of ext3, can some of you please take a look at the patch, and see whether it contains any flaws (and tell me which flaws)? Thanks! The

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Prf_Sig_Sm_2c_72.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1143 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20020918/63a60479/Prf_Sig_Sm_2c_72.gif

Documentation/ext3.txt suggests that the "user_xattr" and "acl" mount options are on by default. This doesn't seem to be the case, as the kernel deduces the default mount options from the filesystem superblock, and mke2fs does not appear to write any default mount options there. This error was spotted by Jacques de Mer. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd at

Hi, As I can see in the last mailing list I am not the only one to get problems with ACL support in Linux. Whatever the samba version (2.2.4, 2.2.5) the main problem is how acl and extended attributes can be implemented fine in linux. I've installed samba on AIX systems where acl is implemented (native) and NT ACL works fine at each time (the only difficulty there is that nsswitch is not

G'day... I've installed the acl - xatrrib patch from bestbits and it works nice on my RH9 system with Samba.. the only problem i encounter is that a file or directory losses it's extended atrributes when you copy it.. for example cp "--preserve=all /source /destination" preserves the normal acl af the linux system, but skips the acl/xattrib from bestbits. i used the

Hi! Has anyone got any "success story" or any good advice of using Posix ACLs (or Enhanced Attributes) with Samba? I'm using Debian woody with 2.4.22 linux, ext3fs and Samba 3. -- Pirkka