similar to: ltsp winbindd and kernels

No big surprise there. :) I'm still trying to figure exactly what goes on with the machine password changing around. Who initiates this? nmbd? The PDC? Who's notified of this change, and what's going on there. Perhaps someone can shed some light? -- Nir Soffer -=- Software Engineer, Exanet Inc. -=- "Father, why are all the children weeping? / They are merely crying son O, are

Has anyone out there successfully gotten pam_mount and winbind working together successfully? --thanks ________________________________________ David M. Leuser, II Assistant Network Administrator New Hampton School (603) 744-3182 x121 dleuser@newhampton.org

Hi all, i had everything samba working PERFECT a few days ago, meantime something has changed or something i've changed, i know not what, is causing me to not be able to authenticate domain users... it just plain doesn't work. i haven't changed anything in /etc/pam.d/, but i checked on it and everything there is still ok.... wbinfo -u lists all the users just swell. One wierd thing

****** The problem ****** (Finally) I have my red hat 7.2 (LTSP) system authenticating users from an NT4.0 domain using winbind... BUT after it authenticates... the screen goes blank, where it would normally load the window manager and instead of having my desktop come up, the login dialogue comes back. ******What I THINK is happening...(?)****** PLEASE HELP! I'm trying to run ICEwm and/or

Hi, I'm going to scream. I have a "dell-installed" red hat 7.2 build and I have been attempting to get it to join my NT4.0 domain with samba... after getting past the old version of samba that shipped with it and updating to the latest samba from the samba web site, i still can't join my domain.... Here's the kicker: I CAN JOIN a test domain I set up a few weeks ago, NT4.0

G'day All Thank you to every one who has helped me get pam_mount and winbind working. I can now use winbind to use the passwords from a samba HEAD PDC to do authentications and pam_mount to mount the users home directory. YAY Does any one know what the option is to change the permissions on a mounted directory in pam_mount? at present it gives me rwxr-xr-x, which is fine. But I run startx

SERIOUSLY.... does ANYONE have ANY ideas??? I'm stumped silly. HELP!!!! thanks, dave > >Hi, I'm going to scream. > >I have a "dell-installed" red hat 7.2 build and I have been attempting to >get it to join my NT4.0 domain with samba... after getting past the old >version of samba that shipped with it and updating to the latest samba >from the samba web

Hi, I'm investigating using LTSP for thin clients at my place of work, and I've encountered a problem that I don't know how to approach. I don't know if the problem is with gPXE, PXELinux, or the LTSP kernel, but I think PXELinux is probably the right level to investigate it. My situation is as follows: I've installed the LTSP system from Ubuntu Gutsy. I've tested it

When a regular user (say, "jmc") logs onto my Linux (LTSP, Samba, DHCP) server via his LTSP terminal I need an NT drive share to be mounted with the permissions that NT intends. Our NT file print server has a directory named "private" which contains subdirectories for each user. Each user has NT read/write permissions to his/her private subdir and no others. I need for each

Hi guys, (sorry for my english, i?m brazilian) I?m making a solution for my business , using LTSP and WINE for run my application for Linux... I installed sucessful both ltsp and wine, i?m running perfectly my application on server of LTSP... but when i try to run the same application on the terminal?s of LTSP, i receive the following error: X Error of failed request: BadShmSeg (invalid

Dear All, I'm sending this mail in relation to a post on the CentOs 6 forum : https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=32545&start=0#forumpost139559 CentOs 6 works great so far, and I do not want to sound impatient, but I'm eager to find out when Ltsp would be available on CentOs6 - or even in Rhel6. We now use Kiwi-Ltsp on OpenSuse and

Hello all, I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party. I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup, it lacks the support and/or documentation whereas LTSP is very good in it. Another

Hi all, I'm setting up a CentOS 4 in AMD64 box. The goal is to mount a terminal server with LTSP software. Currenlty I'm in troubles with the multimedia support. I've added Dag's, Karanbir's and Dries' repositories according that. ?Is there some intention to make a multimedia group as others groups (FTP Server, Web Server... etc)? It would be great. ?What packages do you

Hi, I've been using pxe-enabled nic's with an lzpxe-etherboot image generated by rom-o-matic.net to boot a ltsp.org kernel, with dhcp 3 to use if statements to determine which filename option he gives to the pxe/etherboot dhcp client.Explained at http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/pxe.howto.html This works perfectly, except for the fact that you can't use 1 etherboot pxe image for

On a Suse server I'm trying to setup an USB slave printer to a work station here below are my configuration files. When I boot a station, i can see on the lower right ?the identification of the station as localhost(192.168.0.101) +time ?stamp The printer is configured in cups as ipp://192.168.0.101:9100 my problem is when I send a print out the print stays on cups and stall. the print

Hello All, I set up ltsp regulary, on Centos6 machines. This morning I have a Selinux problem that usualy does not occur: after setting everything up, the thinclients boot, but nobody can login. It only works after the command : # echo 0 > /selinux/enforce I tried this semanage command: # semanage fcontext -a -t bin_t /usr/bin/xauth but it makes no difference. The message I'm now

I have samba 3.0.7 from the official RPMs working almost-perfect in our win2k3 domain with fedora core 2 ... except: smb mount works from the box in question as excpected for all but our two win2k3 domain controllers, one of which is our file server. shares mount from these but the permissions are as follows: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 26 23:46 floppy ?--------- ? ? ? ?

Dear All, I would be grateful if you can help me. My problem is the following: I have a data set like: ID time X1 X2 1 1 x111 x211 1 2 x112 x212 2 1 x121 x221 2 2 x122 x222 2 3 x123 x223 where X1 and X2 are 2 covariates and "time" is the time of observation and ID indicates the

I'm seeing something similar to bug 1179 (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179), even with the reordered IP options check. For some reason, getsockopt is returning an IP options of length 2, value 00 00. Would Mark Weindling's original patch (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1105) break anything if I incorporated it? Platform: HP NonStop S7000 series

So, I'm trying to paw through the long set of smb.conf options - and it's rather daunting. I'm wondering what smb.conf options are most important/appropriate/common for mostly Windows XP/7/(possibly v8) clients. TIA -Greg -- Gregory Sloop, Principal: Sloop Network & Computer Consulting 503.251.0452 x121 Voice | 503.251.0452 Fax www.sloop.net mailto:gregs at sloop.net