similar to: RE: [PATCH] smbfs readdir fix (CFT: NetApp, OS/2)

Vlad. I still got the same problem - 'ls | wc -l' returned incorretc numbers. I installed the following patches with the sequence vs. the kerner 2.4.18: 1. 00-smbfs-2.4.18-codepage.patch.gz 2. 01-smbfs-2.4.18-lfs.patch.gz 3. 02-smbfs-2.4.18-unicode.patch.gz 4. smbfs-2.4.19-pre9-readdir.patch After installed patches, I ran 'make modules' and so on. Any more

Am 27.06.2000 19:58:44 schrieb urban: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 klaus-georg.adams@rwg.de wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > your patch from 2.2.15 to 2.2.16, backing out the older protocol levels breaks > > reading from an OS/2 LAN Server. > > The appended patch fixes things for me (against 2.2.16). > > This backs out a lot of desired changes. For example I think

Hello everyone I have recently reported problems reading a certain directory from an NT server on this list (and speculated in causes). I have a few workarounds and now I'm looking for some feedback on what the proper fix is and for people to test if my patch works for them. Please test smbfs with and without the patch on the directory in this zipfile (all files are empty):

Hi! Here's a patch that allows Linux smbfs to list large directories (i.e. > 100 items) when talking to an OS/2 server. There is a misunderstanding about the flags sent in the FINDFIRST request which causes the OS/2 server to indicate an EOS (end of search) in the FINDFIRST response, even when there are more items to be listed. The result is that smbfs will display only the first ~120

Hi, When I "smbmount" a shareable drive on my linux box, the result of the "ls" command is often false. (Kernel is compiled with "SMB Win95 bug work around" and "SMB filesystems support", Linux 2.0.34, RedHat 5.1, Samba 1.9.18p5) What can I do to solve my problem ??? Thanks a lot for your help. Michel

I have a problem. When I mount my CD (witch is on WIN97 machine) using smbmount I do not see all files in all dirs. If dir have more then, let say, 100 files (it is not the same every time), I do not see all files. This is a problem because on my Linux box I do not have CD-ROM, so if I have to install some packages I first have to copy rpm files on disk, and then install them witch is annoying.

> I have just upgraded to Samba 2.0.6 and can no longer connect to Samba > shares on my FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE machine. When I attempt to connect, the > smb.log contains the following information: > > [2000/01/04 17:54:42, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(566) > resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name > NTWEB2.AIS.MSU.EDU<0x20> > [2000/01/04

Is there a file I can place in the netlogin directory (or anywhere else for that matter) that will represnet a logon script? I want to have my workstations auto-mount particular shares on the samba server, without the user having to make the mount. This way when I add new users, the shares are automatically present. If there is a script I can place somwehre, please tell me what it's name is

I am pleased to announce the release of cft-0.2.0; the major new feature in this release is that cft now tracks package operations, so that things like yum -y install httpd rpm -e evolution will be reflected in the generated manifest. Details and downloads can be found at http://cft.et.redhat.com/ RPM''s for Fedora and RHEL are available at http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum

I''ve started working on a new tool that should help with modifying the configuration of a system under the control of puppet. The tool is called cft (pronounced ''sift'') and is inspired by Gnome''s Sabayon[1] in taht it watches how an admin changes a system and spits out a puppet manifest based on its observations. Cft''s website is

hi,all does some one had use the cft tool to build manifest for puppet on the debian os ? I just test it,can''t work ,so sad. huangmingyou --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe

With CFT version you chose to build, and package individual components such as sendmail with a port option. That does entirely solve the problem of being able to reinstall sendmail after the fact without a rebuild of the userland (base) port but perhaps base flavors could solve that problem assuming flavors could extend beyond python. Joe Maloney Quality Engineering Manager / iXsystems

On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. > > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly > respect LDFLAGS. > > To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all ports. > > The default

On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. > > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly > respect LDFLAGS. > > To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all ports. > > The default

FreeBSD Community, I'm pleased to announce a CFT for builds of FreeBSD 12-stable and 13-current using "TrueOS-inspired" packaged base. These are stock FreeBSD images which will allow users to perform all updating via the 'pkg' command directly. Rather than trying to answer all questions in this announcement, we've created a FAQ page with more details. Please refer to

On 6/5/23 10:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/03, michael.christie at oracle.com wrote: >> >> On 6/2/23 11:15 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> The problem is that as part of the flush the drivers/vhost/scsi.c code >> will wait for outstanding commands, because we can't free the device and >> it's resources before the commands complete or we will hit the

David Chisnall wrote on 2019/04/30 10:22: > On 29/04/2019 21:12, Joe Maloney wrote: >> With CFT version you chose to build, and package individual components >> such as sendmail with a port option.? That does entirely solve the >> problem of being able to reinstall sendmail after the fact without a >> rebuild of the userland (base) port but perhaps base flavors could

I''ve been meaning to test this setup somewhere for a while, but never got the right app/(real) traffic/hardware to do it with. So maybe somebody can try it out and let us know if this works... It''s for applications running the same code/data on a cluster of machines, so this doesn''t apply to the majority of low-traffic sites out there. The goal is to avoid having to

On 06/05, Mike Christie wrote: > > On 6/5/23 10:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 06/03, michael.christie at oracle.com wrote: > >> > >> On 6/2/23 11:15 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> The problem is that as part of the flush the drivers/vhost/scsi.c code > >> will wait for outstanding commands, because we can't free the device and >

On 6/6/23 7:16 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/05, Mike Christie wrote: >> >> On 6/5/23 10:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> On 06/03, michael.christie at oracle.com wrote: >>>> >>>> On 6/2/23 11:15 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>>> The problem is that as part of the flush the drivers/vhost/scsi.c code >>>> will wait for