Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "some benchmarks"
2003 Jun 25
0
Re: Ext3-users digest, Vol 1 #910 - 5 msgs
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote :
>Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to
> ext3-users@redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ext3-users-request@redhat.com
>
>You can reach the person
2003 Jun 19
2
htree and nfs benchmarks
Well here is what I got from testing htree with NFS.
http://labs.zianet.com/benchmarks_html/postmark_benchmarks_NFS_100_htree.html
It looks like htree improves performance when the storage device is
local(as per
my previous post) but it looks like htree degrades performance when used
in conjunction
with NFS. I am going to try it with gigabit ethernet when I get the
time to see if
maybe I am
2003 Jun 18
3
ext3 2.4.21 htree tests
Hi,
Just thought I'd share some test results of mine in case anyone is
interested.
Basically the tests are siumulating what our product does with files -
although the tests do it a lot quicker (not as many files though).
The test is to create 1 million files (each containing the text of the
file number) spread over a number of directories. The files are then
removed in the same manner as
2003 Jun 07
1
New htree patches?
Hello,
Could someone create some newer htree patches for the 2.4.x kernel?
There are some bug fixes in the 2.4.21-rc releases that would be nice to
have but the htree patches preceed those and they won't apply cleanly
to later pre/rc kernels.
It sounds like Marcelo may be about ready to put out 2.4.21 so it may
just be worth holding off until that happens, but I don't suspect much
will
2005 Feb 07
2
mke2fs options for very large filesystems
Wow, it takes a really long time to make a 2TB ext2fs. Are there
better-than-default options that could be used for a large filesystem?
mke2fs 1.34 (25-Jul-2003)
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
244203520 inodes, 488382016 blocks
24419100 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
14905 block groups
32768 blocks per group,
2004 Apr 14
2
3com Ethernet Power Supply
Hello,
I am trying to set up some Cisco 7940G phones with the
3com POE injectors. I have the 3CNJPSE24 power injector,
this is the rackmountable 24 port injector. My question is
does anyone know how to serial console into these things?
I have tried just about every cable setup I can think of and
baud rates but I can't seem to get anything out of it. I want
to check to see what certain
2004 May 13
3
recommend a Linux based TFTP server
Hi, can anyone recommend a Linux based TFTP server to go on an asterisk box?
Thanks in advance
Robb
2004 Dec 15
4
Re-2: Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
That was a good hint!
Yes, I've installed SP2, and it realy seems to be the Problem.
Now I've checked that on a machine with SP1 - and the jobs
from the same printqueue are removed correctly there!
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ? (14-Dez-2004 19:13)
From: novosirj@umdnj.edu
To: t.pompe@architekt-prinz.at
>
2004 Nov 28
3
file_set_dosmode / No data available with 3.0.8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
after upgrading to samba 3.0.8 (debian/unstable, i386) i too encounter
similar problems as reported here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/095567.html
upon logoff from a win2k(sp4) client, the profile cannot be saved and the
samba logfile from the client (prinz) gives:
[2004/11/26 17:57:06, 2]
2007 Jul 14
1
Kernel panic in ext3:dx_probe, help needed
This may or may not be ext3 related but I am trying to find any pointers
which might help me. I got a number of HP Proliant DL380 g5 with a P400
controller and also two qla2400 cards. The OS is RedHat EL4 U5 x86_64.
Every time during reboot these systems panic after the last umount and I
believe before the cciss driver is getting unloaded. The last messages I
am able to see are:
md: stopping
2002 Oct 21
3
htree questions
I decided that I would try out 2.5.44, and I noticed that htree was
merged. If I don't do the tune2fs -O dir_index, and e2fsck -D, the
(exisintg) fs won't use htree, right? Once I do the tune2fs and e2fsck,
will I still be able to go back to a non-htree kernel if needed? (Will
a htree-ized fs work on a non-htree kernel?) I'm guessing that it
won't. I've seen a 2.4 htree
2003 Dec 10
1
ext3 htree upgrade
Hi Guys,
I am planning on upgrading an existing NFS exported filesystem to the
ext3 htree patch on kernel v2.4.23.
Will the patch index directories automatically after tune2fs -O
dir_index or should I do an e2fsck -Dfy on the filesystem before
remounting?
2003 Apr 07
1
2.4.20 and htree
Apologies for the newbie question:
I have a (stock) 2.4.20 build (*not* -ac), and I'm trying to work with
large ext3 directories. By large, I mean 160,000 files per directory. (Yes,
I know it would be better in nested directories but such is life).
I feel htree would benefit me. Close reading of the 2.4 changelog suggests
that htree isn't in there - only a patch to prevent non-htree
2006 Aug 03
2
how can I tell if a directory is using dir_index?
Hi,
I enabled dir_index on a filesystem and dumpe2fs -h also reports this.
My understanding is that this will be used for newly created directories
and that old directories can be indexed using "fsck.ext2 -D".
Two questions:
- Is there a way to tell is a given directory is indexed or not?
- Is there a better way to index the root fs than to boot off a live
CD?
Best,
Norbert
2006 Mar 17
1
[RFC] mke2fs with DIR_INDEX, RESIZE_INODE by default
I've been thinking recently that we should re-enable DIR_INDEX in mke2fs
by default. When it first came out, we had done this and were bitten by
a few bugs in the code. However, this code has been in heavy use for
several thousand filesystem years in Lustre, if not elsewhere, and I'm
inclined to think it is pretty safe these days.
Likewise, RHEL/FC have had RESIZE_INODE as a standard
2007 Oct 24
1
Problem with file system
While I untar a large archive on xfs , ext3 (ver 1.3 and ver 1.4) file
systems , on ppc processor and kernel ver 2.6.21 , I get an error. Also
sometimes, on ext3 (1.3 and 1.4) the file system goes read-only while
untarring.
The same tar file when untarred on a i386 machine works properly.
ERROR:
--------------
tar: Skipping to next header
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
tar:
2006 Oct 04
2
EXT3 and large directories
I have an ext3 filesystem that has several directories and each
directory gets a large number of files inserted and then deleted over
time. The filesystem is basically used as a temp store before files are
processed. The issue is over time the directory scans get extremely slow
even if the directories are empty. I have noticed the directories can
range in size from 4k - 100M even when they are
2004 May 23
2
ext3 htree issues
Hi Guys,
I am running ext3 on kernel v2.6.5.
I have an ext3 filesystem with dir_index and data=journal for
/var/spool/exim
Today I noticed in the exim logs a bunch of 'failed to unlink
/var/spool/exim/input/P/1BRbSP-0006hy-Jp-D'
I also noticed these in the kernel logs:
EXT3-fs warning (device hda12): ext3_unlink: Deleting nonexistent file
(612870), 0
EXT3-fs warning (device hda12):
2003 Dec 02
1
htree in 2.6.0-test11
Just out of curiosity: Is htree in 2.6.0-test11 ?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916
Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - AIM. ralfpostfix
2003 Mar 13
6
Updated 2.4 htree patches available for 2.4.21-pre5
There's a new set of ext2/3 patches for 2.4.21-pre5 available at:
http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/extfs-update-2.4.21pre5-2
and in broken out form at:
http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/broken-out-2.4.21pre5-2
New to this patch set include:
* A kludge to help htree work well with Linux's NFS implementation
* Allow the orlov allocator to be disabled via a