similar to: devfs and ext3?

Hi All, I had to reboot a machine as I lost the ssh connectivity to it. I could ping to it though. On rebooting, the dmesg buffer showed the following messsage hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } hdc: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, CHS=7520/0/155, sector=1820440 end_request: I/O error, dev 16:02 (hdc), sector 1820440 hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady

Until last week my wine runs a Microcontroler Programmer under serial port very well, But in this week have problems to work wine for serial ports on my new Mandrake 8.1. Well, in Mdk 8.1 there is no ttyS0 devices but links to /dev/tts/0 and /dev/tts/1 I realy don't remember how was until last week, but I think about users and perms to devices. I try to chmod a+rw for /dev/tts/0 and tts/1

I can not start my laptop anymore, due to what looks like a physical HD failure. During boot I get: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { Uncorrectable Error }, LBAsect=260112, sector 51144 and then JBD: Failed to read block at offset 5864 JBD: recovery failed EXT3-fs: error loading journal then the laptop is frozen. While I understand this drive will need a prompt replacement, I am trying to recover

Hi there, I'm trying to set tinc and I get the following messages: Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: tincd 1.0.1 (Aug 14 2003 15:09:44) starting, debug level 0 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: Script tinc-up exited with non-zero status 126 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 subject about says it all. should this only be done once per device or periodically? thanks! - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org Illiterate? Write for help! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

A hardware vendor shipped us a product installed with RedHat 8.0 with all file systems created as ext3. This system has about 800 GB of space which we use for buffering email files (in RFC format). Several weeks into the project and with millions of emails stored, we started seeing "out of inode" (something like that) error messages in the /var/log/messages. Are inodes fixed on ext3

Hi, got a very severe problem. I have two hard drives in my RS server and I am getting the secondary drive removed. Here's the problem. After the secondary drive is removed, the server fails to bootup completely, crashing at fsck. The server boots up fine when the secondary drive is put back in however. Has anyone ever encountered this problem before? Could the problem be to references to

I'm using RedHat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.18-26.7.xsmp and root mount using ext3. And I have simple test.pl script: #!/usr/local/bin/perl open FILE, ">testfile"; while(1){ print FILE "Test.\n" or die $!; } It's died when the file size is 2147483647 and give error message: "File size limit exceeded" and I run "cat testfile testfile >>

Greetings. Total newbie with Ext3. I selected when I upgraded my system to RH7.2. I upgraded my system again to RH8.0. Here is some info: [root@world root]# cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 /dev/hdd1 /mnt/genericdata1 ext2 rw 0 0 Ok, so

Does anyone know of any Linux-based filesystem that does file-level auditing and logs based on username? Does ext2/3 do such auditing (stock or with patches)? I would like a filesystem that can be told to audit and log file deletions and log the username that deleted the file (similar to auditing on NTFS). I know, I should be using file permissions to prevent this type of deletion from

Dear all, Due to the power failure, so i need to restart my redhat linux server. but i got below error messages, pls everybody can help/teach me fix the problem by return mail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yours system appears to have shut down uncleanly Press Y within 1 seconds

shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 delset shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add hide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path random unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path urandom unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path zero unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path pty\* unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path pty\* unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path tty\* unhide shell#

Hello all, I know this question is (strictly speaking) off topic, but if someone could at least point me in the right direction, I would be most grateful. I have an older system (RH 6.2, overdue for upgrade) with an ext2 partition that was pushing 99% filled. I did some space recovery and I have it down to around 90% utilization now. I have rebooted the unit, and brought it up single-user

Hello, I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them. For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab: devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0 Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem. This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previous 7-STABLE (FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #16: Fri Mar 7 14:30:08 CET 2008) to today's STABLE- but not

While compiling two kernels and untarring a third, my root fs was remounted r/w and I got the following in dmesg (kernel 2.4.19-pre9): EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Aborting journal on device ide0(3,2). ext3_abort called EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal. Remounting filesystem read-only Remounting filesystem read-only

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a little patch for the drivers.list The "Cyber Power Systems Intelligent Series CP1500EAVRLCD" ups http://eu.cyberpowersystems.com/products/ups_systems/intelligent/cp1500eavrlcd.htm Got one here running (see: https://nut.stillbilde.net/cgi-bin/nut/upsstats.cgi?host=CyberPower at upsmonitor) Works flawlessly. Patch as follows:

I am having major problems on one of my file-servers. I have the root filesystem on an Ext3 software RAID 1 between four SCSI drives. It had been running for about two months without problems, but today I found it was having some trouble with unlinked inodes and I/O errors on certain files. I took it down to single-user mode, and ran fsck on it. That operation mixed up files like /etc/hosts with

Folks: Is there a limit to the number of arguments that can be passed to fileutils programs such as mv or rm ? If yes, is it filesystem dependant/kernel config dependant/fileutils version dependant? Can this maximum limit be tuned/controlled ? I googled on it a bit, but couldn't find anything much more relevant than a message in the OS-X forum.

hi i got 2 questions and maybe someone could shed some light: a) i'm using kernel 2.4.17 and use ext3 in it. is it possible that the whole system is slower than with ext2? i switched back to ext2 (great feature!!!) and the system's response seemed somewhat better. should/could there be such a effect as double writing of journaled data? i didnt activate debugging (jbd). b) is reiserfs

Hi. I was using 2.4.10 with ext3 0.9.10 and thought it was time to use -ac for the first time because 2.4.12-ac3 includes 0.9.12. I don't know what I did to get the following messages, but in my last boot I removed /etc/mtab (at runtime) and made it a symlink to /proc/mounts. Not sure if a bad idea, but the only problem until I rebooted was the need of losetup -d. When I rebooted, all