similar to: browsing users/groups in 2.2.1a

Is this list archived anywhere in an easily searchable format? I'd like to check the archives before asking a question that's already been answered... tia, Christian ---------------------------------------------- Christian Cryder [christianc@atmreports.com] Internet Architect, ATMReports.com Barracuda - http://barracuda.enhydra.org ----------------------------------------------

hi all, i've spent an incredible amount of time trying to get samba working between linux (satan, debian testing, samba 3.0.0) and win2k (lucifer) and i'm at wit's end. i'm begging for help. i spent most of the morning reading samba docs, and have gone from knowing zilch about MS networking to, well, a little something about MS networking. my ultimate goal is to be able to

Hi samba list. We have installed two unix machines running samba 2.2.2. Also, we have a NT server with an nt domain. Both samba servers belongs to TESTGROUP (we don't want to put samba into a nt domain). The things works fine, until we include two pc-clients into the same group. Those pcs cannot browse the network, also, they cannot see itself. The problem was solved when we include

However.... When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1

On Tue, July 19, 2016 10:06 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. Maybe it is your server that had been "barracuded"?

Hi folks, It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) Assume there is a share, where the files and folders in the share root should at least be readable by anybody having access to the share. For the sake of simplicity the following permissions apply on

On 07/19/2016 10:06 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. > > I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda > software

Hi, I have two samba domains. On one member of DOMAIN1 I set up a share "intranet" with valid users = +"DOMAIN1+webmaster" +"DOMAIN2+TestGroup" Winbindd is running. When I try to access the share from a DOMAIN2 workstation permission is denied. When I look at the logfile, I see that the server tries to find the group of DOMAIN2 (TestGroup) in ldap of the local

Hai, > > In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch > Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). > > Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is no unix_primary_group > option for the clients. So I have to use the "dirty" tweak of > modifying all my users "primaryGroupID" to the corresponding >

Does you filesystem support extended attributes? What does "|getfattr -n security.NTACL |filename" return?|| On 30.01.2024 16:13, Peter Milesson wrote: > Hi folks, > > It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces > Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have > used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) > > Assume

On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : >> Hai, >> >>> In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch >>> Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). >>> >>> Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is

Hello everyone, we are in the process of changing from a Windows Domain to a Samba Domain and tried to implement some restrictions for OU-Admins. In the Windows Domain those restrictions can be implemented with Security ID: S-1-3-4 (Owner Rights). In our old Windows Domain everything works fine and as expected. In our Samba Domain, it doesnt work. We tried to implement the same rights as in

Hi list, I'm having one of those 'I'm stupid' -problems with LVM on CentOS 5.2. I've been working with traditional partitions until now, but I've finally been sold on the theoretical benefits of using LVM, but for now I only have a huge pile of broken filesystems to show for my efforts. My scenario; I attach a disk, either over USB or iSCSI. I create a PV on this

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: >My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen >section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > >I have not problem with the emails it noted as >being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" >as a commercial product. > >I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda >software and

Hello, I have a strange problem with Samba and LDAP backend with the statement valid users = @group. The valid users = @username works great, but the @group oder +group statement does not work. But the users in the @group does never get access to the shares! I'm using Samba 3.2.5-4 on Debian Lenny the LDAP server is located at an Debian Etch system. But this ldap server works quite good.

On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > a ?crit : > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : >>>> Hai, >>>>

Hi there, I'm trying to configure Squid to use a windows domain for authentication, and all goes well until I add the "--require-membership-of" option on ntlm_auth. I need to restrict access based on group membership, however ntlm_auth does not seem to be behaving correctly. I'm using Samba 3.0.6 on Debian and I'm using a Windows 2000 (SP4) Domain Controller. I

My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". I have not problem with the emails it noted as being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" as a commercial product. I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda software and "yum list '*barrac*'" comes up empty. What is this? Jon -- Jon

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 17:04, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > a ?crit : > > > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H.

I have a unix group that owns some files on a share, and I'd like to set up a group mapping so that an Active directory group (with an exising mapping in winbind from earlier use) gets access to these files via a mapping. I've been fooling around with net groupmap add, and haven't been able to get this set up. The group Domain Users has an existing mapping to gid 10004, which winbind