similar to: lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(349)

Hi, Does Samba 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 support 64 bit? We are using Clearcase & Rational told us that only samba 2.2.5 support 64 bit? Any help would be arreciated. Thanks, -Murali

Hi all, I've posted a similar message a few weeks ago. I had the 'oplock' problem. I run a linux server with samba (specification below). I get a reply who told me to disable kernel oplocks and oplocks. I did exactly what he told me to do. I hoped it worked... but it did not... From there one i started reading in the archives and followed the 'lock' discussions in this list.

Hi, My setup: RedHat 7.3 PDC server with samba 2.2.7 rpm rebuilt with max connections patch and ldapsam and a few other minor changes, openldap 2.0.23-4. Windows 2000 Terminal Server with SP3, with various pre SP4 updates too. Various Win2K Pro, Win95 OSR2 clients. [homes] comment = Home writable = yes valid users = %S nt acl support = no oplocks = no path = /md3/profiles/%U

"H-disk" share is " /home/%U/disk" User1 H: ---------> /home/user1/disk (h-disk) User2 H: ----------> /home/user2/disk (h-disk) When User1 opens a file "H:Øfoo.doc" and then User2 opens a file on this share with the _same_ name ("H:Øfoo.doc") we get from Word (office programs?): "Foo.doc already opened by another user". When user1

I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no avail. (Like this one http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting before compilation - - ie how to compile samba to a 64 bit application to get more available file

Email eller vedhæftet fil afsendt fra din adresse (eller med din adresse som afsender) er blevet afvist fra Allerød Kommune. Spam og virus bliver typisk sendt under dække af andre afsendere og den blokerede email behøver derfor ikke oprinde direkte fra dig. (Husk dog altid at have et opdateret antivirusprogram på din computer.) Du kan evt. scanne din computer med det gratis' værktøj

Hi, We (NetBSD) just received a bug report that smbclient's mput command usees find(1) with a non-standard option "-maxdepth". This was replaced with a simple call to ls(1). As I don't know how many of the patches from out Packages Collection were sent to you in the past, I'm simply sending you all our patches - please include any you like in future samba releases! BTW,

server machine or OS, just the samba stuff and some interaction with 98/ME and apparently 2000 in my testing. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" <jeremy@valinux.com> To: "cpctc" <cpctc@vt.edu> Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:59 AM Subject: Re: samba transmits only one packet per second > On Sat, Jul 14,

Dear All Firstly my thanks to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@samba.org> for his answer - I have now 'use co -r SAMBA_TNG'ed and have a fresh CVS snapshot. The ./configure works again - yipee! But the 'make all' fails with the warnings pated below. I have tried the other CVS snapshots from http://sernet.pair.com/ and they are in a similar broken state (although broken

To : Support Staff I need to test SAMBA with a HP K 9000 Class machine, with HP-UX 10.20 operating system. Wich SAMBA software version is compatible with this OS? How can I get this software? Thanks and regards, Mario

Hello, at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux StandardServer 8 - Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration from s. 2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, when using

I am running Citrix Metaframe XP on Windows 2000 server and would like to have the ability to access files on my AIX Unix server. Are there any issues with Samba in a Windows Terminal Server environment? Thanks, Tim Brooks

Attached is a 500KB read-only .doc file with a Samba and Terminal Server whitepaper. I have tried to hit every known issue and all available workarounds. If anyone has comments or suggestions, let me know. JT has it, so it should end up in the next How-To. Sorry about the file format, but the .pdf was 2.5MB, which I thought was too big to post. Eric Roseme Hewlett-Packard

Hi all, We are trying to print the log messages pertaining to each share in a different log file for auditing purposes. We are using Samba v3.0.20b. We are trying to modify the file smbd/service.c::make_connection_snum() function by changing the log file full path. The code changes that is done are as follows: char logfilefullpath[70]; char sharename[256]; safe_strcpy_fn

I've got a home network with using win2k pro. Do I need to set Samba up as a pdc for the w2k machines to connect? Currently I've got my w2k machines set up as a workgroup and simply set up Samba as a member of that workgroup. My problem is that I cannot connect to it. I see my samba box in my network neighborhood, however, I cannot browse it. I'm running Samba 2.2.2 that came with

Our CAD Drawings are stored on a Samba Share. We want to open large Assembly's but we get following errors: [2002/08/06 12:47:59, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(348) Unable to open new log file /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd: Too many open files [2002/08/06 12:48:49, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(348) Unable to open new log file /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd: Too many open files [2002/08/06

Hi everyone, Recently upgraded to 3.3.7 on a test server (can do everything on it if you need to test something like patch, configuration options, etc?), and got big problems with printing very similar to http://www.mail-archive.com/samba at lists.samba.org/msg97841.html signaled for version 3.2.6 I'm on CentOS 5.3 recently updated (with sernet packages) and I checked that I have the correct

Hi, I'm using samba 3.3.15 as domain member in an w2k8 ad. We're using the w2k3/xp add printer wizard to add a printer to the server. Since the update from 3.2.15 to 3.3.15 the apw fails when clicking on the "finish" button. At the same time a smb panic occurs and fills the smbd log with the lines below. [2011/06/24 07:47:56, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(663) Unable to

Hi, the option -l (name of logfile) of smbd is ignored in samba 2.0.6. The reason: In smbd/server.c first the argument of the option is copied to the variable debugf. Then debugf is initialized with SMBLOGFLE (default value). "log file" in the configuration file works. Wolfgang Kretzschmar -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Wolfgang

Hi everyone, I recently wanted to try Samba 3.3.11 for CentOS 5.4. At first, I tried the Sernet packages then I compiled my own packages but in both cases, I get the same error messages (SMB?PANIC) when I try to install/delete/use printers in Samba. At first, I thought this was a right issue on filesystem (due to messages "Permission denied" in logs), so I change many rights at many