similar to: After reIP, Samba hosts not browsable.

Hey folks, I am having a devil of a time compiling 3.4p1 on HP-UX 11.00. I'm running gcc 2.95.2, OpenSSL 0.9.6d, and zlib 1.1.4. I have two questions, but here's the first... I am getting the dreaded: *** zlib missing - please install first or check config.log *** error when running configure, no matter what options I give it. --with-zlib doesn't help at all - I've tried it

I've read several other emails and pages on the wiki but none give any deffinate answers. if you have 20 asterisk servers each with 4 pri's, all running RealTime Extensions and RealTime SIPBuddies from the same MySQL server, what prevents you from putting all 20 servers behind a single load balancer? That way all of your UA's can use the same IP to register to; vs maintaining which

Hey folks, I recently upgraded my mail server from an older OpenBSD -CURRENT snapshot to the latest (Aug 1). As part of this upgrade, I updated all of my packages to their latest versions. Since this upgrade, dovecot has begun failing to authenticate intermittently. I use it primarily for web mail (Squirrelmail 1.4.20) and leave myself logged in during the day. This problem manifests

On 15 March 2018 at 02:21, George Karpenkov via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there an easily browsable and searchable archive for cfe-dev? > I often find myself wanting to link to a particular email, and it’s a very > time consuming process with a pipermail interface. > I’ve noticed that llvm-dev is reposted to a google group >

Hi. I recently moved a Samba v3.4.7 from being a PDC to a member of a Windows 2008 domain. Everything works fine, shares are visible and usable by users, but only by typing the server name, the server is NOT visible while browsing the network. The only "issue" i noticed is the DNS update error when doing "net ads join" command. I then manually added the DNS entry in windows

On 04/11/15 05:08, Gary Dale wrote: > On 29/10/15 05:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >>> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd >>> process". >>> >>>

Am 28.06.2016 um 09:53 schrieb tell at posteo.de: > the parameter "browsable (browseable)" is a Boolean which allows a share > to be displayed (or not) in list of machine resources. > > But if I set the parameter to "no" - how exactly does it hide the share? > I could not find a clue about the way of achieving that. the share is not listed - or what is your

Am 28.06.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Thomas DEBESSE: > It's not hidden like an hidden file or system file (things you can > display tweaking some explorer options), it's not visible at all. I > think there is no way to list them, it's not hidden, it's unlisted, but > you still can access them if you know the full path. exactly what i said - so why the need to hit reply-all

SMB.Confin File I can see the printers added in the CUPs, I observed that the samba is not setting the Browseable = yes parameter. See the samba configuration file and the output of Testparm: [printers] comment = Compartilhamento de Impressoras path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes create mask = 0700 browseable = yes Saida do Testparm #

Hello, the parameter "browsable (browseable)" is a Boolean which allows a share to be displayed (or not) in list of machine resources. But if I set the parameter to "no" - how exactly does it hide the share? I could not find a clue about the way of achieving that. Best wishes Tom

It's not hidden like an hidden file or system file (things you can display tweaking some explorer options), it's not visible at all. I think there is no way to list them, it's not hidden, it's unlisted, but you still can access them if you know the full path. 2016-06-28 13:10 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: > > > Am 28.06.2016 um 09:53 schrieb

Hi, Is there an easily browsable and searchable archive for cfe-dev? I often find myself wanting to link to a particular email, and it’s a very time consuming process with a pipermail interface. I’ve noticed that llvm-dev is reposted to a google group (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/llvm-dev <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/llvm-dev>) which can be super convenient for that

Hi, In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd process". It's true enough that I can't browse my DC, however, there is an active nmbd process on my Samba server. So I wonder if the explanation of the author is (still) correct. I couldn't find any supporting or contradicting

Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs... > The book is partially correct, nmbd shouldn't be run on a DC, but > there is a netbios server built into the samba binary but it doesn't > contain the browsing code. If you

Hi everyone, I am new to the list and new to Linux as well as to Samba. I've read quite a few howtos, man-pages and other docs on samba now. I configured my own SMB-server with smbd and nmbd. Of course I generated a smb.conf file and my server is accessible and running on the Linux mashine. I can connect with smbclient to the Linux-mashine and to the win2k-mashine (hostname and service

On 29/10/15 05:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In a book I'm reading on Samba4, the author explains that network >> browsing doesn't work for Samba AD DCs "because there is no nmbd >> process". >> >> It's true enough that I can't browse my DC, however, there is an

I have a SerNet Samba 4.0.8 AD DC running on CentOS 6.4 (newdc) replicating from a W2K3 DC (olddc). When I first launch Samba using `sudo samba`, I can go to the Windows server and browse to \\newdc in Explorer, and I see mytestshare, netlogon, printers, sysvol, and "Printers and Faxes". After a while (I'm not sure how long precisely, but under 24 hours) I could not navigate

I have been trying to track down the cause/fix for a problem and I am out of ideas... I am hoping one of you can point me in the right direction. The symptom is that when a calls is placed from an internal extension through an analog line to a number on the pstn the caller can hear the callee but the callee can not hear the caller for as long as ten seconds. The problem appears to happen fairly

Hi, methinks that in the good 3 months since i ordered an IAXy, things have changed so much that now almost anybody out there with a VoIP hardweare website offers complete phones for less money than the IAXy, with support for both IAX2 and SIP in many cases, and fully configurable via its own keypad. What would you recommend as a rugged, small, and easy to configure/use self-contained unit that

Just when I thought I couldn't be wrong, I was wrong. We have woodpeckers that drill into the arial telephone cables, and water seeps through the holes and partially grounds the tip and/or ring wires causing hum. I thought the hum/buz on my lines was a telco problem. The Qwest HQ noise team assures me that my lines are within spec. Sure enough, when I listen on the test set the lines