similar to: 2.6.0-test4+EA, security label

I decided that I would try out 2.5.44, and I noticed that htree was merged. If I don't do the tune2fs -O dir_index, and e2fsck -D, the (exisintg) fs won't use htree, right? Once I do the tune2fs and e2fsck, will I still be able to go back to a non-htree kernel if needed? (Will a htree-ized fs work on a non-htree kernel?) I'm guessing that it won't. I've seen a 2.4 htree

Hello, Richard. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjones@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 8:42 PM > To: Зиновик Игорь Анатольевич <ZinovikIA@nspk.ru> > Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] virt-v2v 1.38 fails to convert .vmx VM: setfiles ... > Multiple same specifications for /.*. > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at

Hi Rich, On Wed, November 16, 2016 1:34 pm, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:31:40AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: >> > Running `virt-v2v -v -x ...' and observing the output will give you a >> > good idea of what precisely it was doing for those hours. >> >> Well, as I said in my original email, it was hanging at running >> setfiles:

Hi, On Wed, November 16, 2016 11:10 am, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> It eventually did complete, after several hours. But I don't understand >> why this particular VM took so long when others (with similar disk >> sizes/usages/configurations) completed in only 1-2 minutes. Each VM is >> effectively exactly the same (it's a build slave), so it's just the

> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjones@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 11:49 AM > To: Зиновик Игорь Анатольевич <ZinovikIA@nspk.ru> > Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] virt-v2v 1.38 fails to convert .vmx VM: setfiles ... > Multiple same specifications for /.*. > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:40:51AM

--- daemon/selinux-relabel.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/daemon/selinux-relabel.c b/daemon/selinux-relabel.c index 112bee1..2f48ee6 100644 --- a/daemon/selinux-relabel.c +++ b/daemon/selinux-relabel.c @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ #include "actions.h" #include "optgroups.h" +#include "ignore-value.h" +

Hi I work on this harddrive for 3 days now ... I had noticed errors in kernel while working on a harddrive (120 gigas) but all continue to work fine (archives/directory).. So i have unmounted the driver and try e2fsck... bad ! e2fsck 1.34 (25-Jul-2003) e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while trying to open /dev/hdc1 So i have tried to create 1 image of this

This shouldn't change the effect of this code. --- mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml | 121 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) diff --git a/mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml b/mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml index 44995df..5df1f08 100644 --- a/mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml +++ b/mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml @@ -28,65 +28,74 @@ module G = Guestfs

Hi, I've installed a few Fedora Core 4 and Fedora Core 5 recently, and found that the new ext3 file systems created with new mkfs.ext3(1.38+) has one more field than EXT3 created with old mkfs.ext3(1.34-), even the latter's dir_index feature was turned on and file systems were upgraded with "e2fsck -y -f -D" command. I have three questions thereafter: 1) what does the

On Monday August 4, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> wrote: > > > > I came back this morning and found: > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted >

[ I realized that we were discussing adding this feature, in various private email, IRC, and this long bugzilla thread: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060423 That's not how we should do things. Let's discuss it on the mailing list. ] One thing that virt-customize/virt-sysprep/virt-builder have to do is relabel SELinux guests. What we do at the moment

Rewrite the relabel API to read the policy configured in the guest, invoking setfiles (added as part of the appliance, as part of policycoreutils) to relabel the specified root. In case of failure at any point of the process, a touch of .autorelabel in the root is tried as last-attempt measure to do the relabel. Considering that running SELinux tools in the appliance might be affected by the

In commit 08f82f2e3d6975b72340dd59f438862e152a15ef we increased the memory size to 800MB (on x86) so that the semodule command would work. However it has been discovered that another SELinux command takes large amounts of RAM (setfiles during the SELinux relabel step). Therefore increase the memory size again, this time to 2000MB. --- v2v/v2v.ml | 2 +- v2v/virt-v2v.pod | 2 +- 2 files

v1 -> v2: - Add simple test of the setfiles API. - Use SELinux_relabel module in virt-v2v (instead of touch /.autorelabel). - Small fixes. Rich.

Instead of just documenting this bug, fix it in the file_contexts file. Replaces commit ad3c8fe7f49c4991e1aa536856a1a408f55d5409. --- customize/SELinux_relabel.ml | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ v2v/virt-v2v.pod | 11 ----------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/SELinux_relabel.ml b/customize/SELinux_relabel.ml index fa9603c..69a4779 100644 ---

Hi! I was testing 2.6.0-test5, but got lots of journal aborted errors. Then I Sysrq-s/u/b and wanted to boot 2.4.23-pre3 or 2.4.22, but ext3 error: cannot find root fs cannot mount because of unsupported optional feature (4) after trying to mount it with ext2 (rootfstype=ext2, not working) I rebooted again into 2.4.22, this time there was just severe fs corrpution, illegal blocks, inodes,

Hi, Just got Fedora FC1 vanilla 2.4.25kernel+libata8patch booting problems, FC1 complains that it can not automatically find&found partitions specified with "LABEL=" in /etc/fstab, and then falls me into repair mode. In the repair mode I can mount it manually without any problems. More interesting are: 1) I have several partitions specified with "LABEL=*" in

We can use the setfiles(8) command to relabel the guest filesystem, even though we don't have a policy loaded nor SELinux enabled in the appliance kernel. This also deprecates or removes the old and broken SELinux support. This patch isn't quite complete - I would like to add some tests to the new API. I'm posting here to garner early feedback. Rich.

http://procontrol.fi/test/ - Crashfix for multipart messages - More optimized mbox rewriting, should be "good enough" for most uses I think. I've been using it for a while now, seems to work. Still some problems: imap(cras): Apr 15 01:48:48 Warning: Our dotlock file /home/cras/mail//full-disclosure.lock was overridden And I'm sure it wasn't. Or at least shouldn't have

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]