similar to: test

----- Forwarded message from Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> ----- On Wednesday September 19, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:08:32PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Sunday September 16, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to

Hello. On a server running 2.4.25, I have the two following errors in the kernel logfile: Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Should I worry about them (disk failure, filesystem damage) ? Thanks. As an addition what does the pair '08:11' means ? Is

Hello, I have this bug report that I have filed. Is there any specific reason why samba behaves this way, and doesn't use the unix semantics? Since this is even more restrictive than unix semantics, I'm more inclined to call it a bug until I know it's supposed to be this way. Any ideas? ----- Forwarded message from Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> ----- From: Mike Fedyk

This was sent to lkml, I think it may be interesting to this list... ----- Forwarded message from "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> ----- Envelope-to: mfedyk@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:38:49 -0800 From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> To: Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: ext3 for

Hi Ext3! I'm running about 30 dedicated MySQL machines under quite decent loads, and they are occassionally crashing. I've been logging console messages recently in an effort to find the cause, and some appear to be related to I perused your lists and found the message I'm replying to. If you don't mind, I've included messages and ksymoops from two crashes that I had

looks like you sent this to the wrong person... ----- Forwarded message from JON GERDES <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> ----- Envelope-to: mikef@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:18:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0000 From: "JON GERDES" <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> To: <mfedyk@matchmail.com> Subject: Re: win98-samba2.0.7 = Network

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Can it be that our accounting packages don't work on SMB and only with NT? I would HATE to put a NT Box into the mix. Ruben -- Brooklyn Linux Solutions http://www.mrbrklyn.com http://www.brooklynonline.com 1-718-382-5752

Hi, I have a large journal of 400MB (the max for 4k blocks), and I'd like to be able to check how much of it is being used. If it's not being used that much, I'd like to know if the writes *from* the journal to the rest of the disk could be delayed until a certain percentage of the journal has been used. It would be nice to be able to get more contiguous writes to the journal for

Hi, I'm using the setup defined for my RH9 box to participate in a Win2000 domain. I have server = domain, etc. This has been working fine for several months. As of this morning, one user can no longer access samba shares. His account settings haven't changed. I am able to access shares from his workstation using my account. I checked the log for his workstation. He has a number of

I tried installing with several options (noacpi noapm; noprobe; noprobe skipddc noacpi noapm nodma). Always I get the same error. BUT this is not in fac a CentOS problem at all, because I get the same error always when I boot from hd (Fedora Core), IF there is a CD in the CD-ROM drive. (I tried with CentOS 1/4, CentOS 2/4 and a HP printer software CD.) It must be something with the CD drive!

Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described

I'm experiencing strange behavior from my ext3 RAID5 array and my Fedora Core 2 system. Before I go crazy varying all sorts of tuning parameters, I thought some list subscribers might provide me with useful advice. The problematic array is: 3x Promise Technology Ultra 100 TX2 PCI cards 6x Maxtor 250GB IDE drives (one drive per cable) RAID level 5, 128Kb chunk size, EXT3: "mkfs -t ext3

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi, I've been wondering exactly what you gain by using journaled mode over ordered mode. Are there any known cases where journaled mode could recover where ordered mode wouldn't? Mike

Hi, I just installed Redhat AS 2.1 on a a new machine with tons of RAID5 space. During the install, I created the partition/filesystem /largedisk with 550784264 blocks. After everything is installed and mounted, I get the following in a df: /dev/sda8 550784264 32828 522773144 1% /largedisk The avail + used != total, not even close. I realize that the 32828 is probably the

I have an ext3 filesystem that has several directories and each directory gets a large number of files inserted and then deleted over time. The filesystem is basically used as a temp store before files are processed. The issue is over time the directory scans get extremely slow even if the directories are empty. I have noticed the directories can range in size from 4k - 100M even when they are

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]