Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Re: samba oplocks problem"
2002 Mar 14
0
Re: Oplocks problems with samba.
Wolfgang,
(cc Linux XFS list)
(cc Samba list)
Quoting wolfgang.glas@ev-i.at:
> I just found you message in the samba mailing list archives and foiund
> out, that we have a very similar problem. We are using samba-2.2.1a on a
> kerenl-2.4.16 and we use reiserfs.
> We also experience data corruption with messages like:
>
> [2002/03/14 15:15:26, 0]
>
2002 Mar 01
4
oplock_break and Excel data corruption with Samba 2.2.3a
Hi everyone,
Just today one of our users informed me that a file she was working on in
Microsoft Excel 97 got corrupted. She was working on the file directly on
our server, which is running Samba 2.2.3a compiled using gcc-3.0.4 on
Linux kernel 2.4.17-xfs and XFS-based filesystems.
I checked the Samba logs for her machine and found the following in a
search for the filename of the Excel file she
2002 Feb 22
0
rec_free_read bad magic and tdb corruption with Samba 2.2.3
Hi everyone,
Our system is a Debian GNU/Linux box running Linux kernel 2.4.17-xfs and
Samba 2.2.3 (from the 2.2.3-5 package from Sid), built using gcc-3.0.3.
With Samba 2.2.2 we hit certain tdb errors where make_connection would
reject connections arbitrarily. Supposedly this was fixed using 2.2.3 so
we upgraded right away (thankfully we do only have Windows 95, 98 and ME
clients so we
2002 Sep 03
2
Suddenly can't print: "rec_read bad magic..."
Suddenly, today, my wife's Windows 95 machine can't print to the
network printer on my Linux machine. It complains that "there was an
error printing to \\posh\lp ... There was a problem printing to the
port."
The error 1st occurred (coincidentally?) after I had upgraded the
kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.19. But rebooting to 2.4.18 has made no
difference.
We're running smbd
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
too.
However, when I mount the share via smbfs (on a Linux box, of course), the
same file is 2.0T as reported by du (ie: du -csh), 18446744072754680087
bytes as reported by ls, but is only 3340095767 bytes as reported by stat.
Further comparison of stat results of the same file via smbfs and directly
are intriguing.
directly (ie: on the server):
Size: 3340095767 Blocks: 6523640 IO Block: 4096
1999 Nov 15
1
Windows Profiles not being placed in defined logon path
Hi there everyone,
I recently upgraded to 2.0.6 from 2.0.5a in a hope to improve data
integrity (I was having oplock_break problems that would affect the
integrity of a lot of Excel files). So far so good with the oplock_breaks
(even with oplocks reenabled). :-)
However, I've started having problems with the clients' Windows profiles
not being placed in my defined logon path.
1999 Oct 21
6
Corrupted Excel files, oplock_break(905) errors
Hi there everyone!
I'm using Samba 2.0.5a-19990721 on a RedHat 6.0 machine with Linux kernel
2.2.12. My system generally works fine, however recently I've had some
complaints about some files being corrupted. The latest and best-handled
to enable a debugging happened at around the same time. Both clients were
using Windows95 OSR2 machines with Excel 97 SP-2. Two users reported the
problem
1999 Nov 22
0
AW: AW: Windows Profiles not being placed in defined logon path
Hi Federico,
many thanks to you. This patch helped me too. Do you know the intention of
the original changes by the samba team in ipc.c. I don't think, it is a good
idea to store all profiles in an separate directory and the user registry in
the home path.
Thanks again
Rudolf
Rudolf Kollien
email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de
Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de
1999 Dec 08
3
Broken Pipe Errors
Hi there everyone!
One of the users complained to me that yesterday, he suddenly couldn't
access the network. He was online the whole day, then suddenly at around
6:45pm he couldn't write. A restart of his workstation rendered him
completely disconnected from the Samba domain.
Server is running Samba 2.0.6 on a RedHat 6.0 machine with Linux kernel
2.2.13. Client is running Windows95 OSR2
1999 Nov 15
2
Problem with socket options after upgrading to Samba 2.0.6
Hi there everyone,
Again another slight thing I noticed since I upgraded to Samba 2.0.6 from
2.0.5a. I'm using RedHat Linux on a Celeron 400 with kernel 2.2.13.
My socket options in smb.conf is set to "TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
SO_KEEPALIVE SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192". However I've started getting
the following everytime I SIGHUP to reload the configs and stop-start:
2002 Feb 19
0
oplocks problem with 2.2.3a
hello,
until last week I had 2.2.1a in place, which, except some fox (dos)
share which needed 'veto oplocks files', worked ok; upgraded to 2.2.3a
with the same smb.conf (details below) and suddenly I started having
oplocks problems (not on the dos share, that one is ok) with almost
every other share (those hold windows files: programs, *doc, *xls):
[2002/02/19 12:31:28, 0]
2002 Jun 25
0
Samba & Redhat - Oplocks
Can any one help me ? This has been bugging me for ages.
I have been using different versions of samba for a while on different
versions of Redhat (7.0, 7.2, 7.3). I regularly get erratic freezing (for
about a minute) whenever I right click on files. This has happened on
different computers on different sites on different networks, so I assume
it's quite consistent
This is what I get when
2002 May 10
0
Oplocks, Oplock_break and request Oplock_break
Hello there.
I'm having a few problems using samba 2.2.3a and sharing a paradox database. On the whole
everything works fine but (there's always a but), every now and again. a machine's shares will
close causing the database to crash (sometimes only that machine) - the other networked
machine recover after a few error messages.
I guess the easy answer would be to disable oplocks
2005 Mar 15
0
Oplocks for veto'd files (Samba 2.2.8a on SuSE 9.0)
In my smb.conf file, I've got the following section:
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
guest ok = no
read only = No
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
browseable = No
veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.MDB/*.pst/*.PST/
And yet, in the syslog, I'm still getting these...
Mar 10 10:22:34 riffraff
2001 Nov 16
1
CPU-load, memory-load, oplocks, smbd-core-dumps
Hi all,
I use samba 2.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2 (1500 NT4 sp6a / w2k sp2 workstation). since
i had updated from 2.0.7 to 2.2.2 the CPU load will very fast go to 100% an
d teh memory use of a smbd process will grow up to 100 MB. In teh log-files
are many errors like that:
PANIC: open_mode_check: Existant process 22700 left active oplock
smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(555) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock
2002 Jun 12
0
Win2k oplocks and you
Hello list!
I've seen the threads in this months archives on oplock issues, so I
hope I am not hitting a sore spot by bringing it up again. The reason I
am beating on this is that I've got a testable, repeatable issue with
Win2K terminal server (SP2) running CorelDRAW 10 (patched to current)
against a Debian Woody box running Samba 2.2.3a-6 for Debian. Since I
can repeatedly test the
2003 Jul 31
1
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file ...
Hi!
I keep getting errors like these:
oplock_break failed for file Word/einaikoon/v-Locator/IBB-Beantragung/0_Antrag_AZK.doc (dev = 301, inode = 2469218, file_id = 7).
[2003/07/31 15:43:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(843)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2003/07/31 15:47:12, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(758)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Success)
2002 Oct 15
0
What is "client failure in oplock break"?
Below are a number of errors that appeared in a log file today.
I am running Samba v2.2.5 on a Red Hat Linux v7.3 system. The client
experiencing/causing the errors below is a WinXP(SP1) machine.
The log entries below pertain to 2 errors, the first in handling file
"6.zip" and the second in attempting to run file
"DiskeeperWks413zssi.exe". I didn't see the first
2000 May 03
2
2.0.7: unsolicited oplock break reply
I've used
oplocks = no
for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I
decided to give 2.0.7 a try.
I still get "oplock break" errors as before, but this time I got a new
error too:
[2000/05/02 10:04:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(976)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file XXXXX/xxxxxx/mailbox.pst
2004 Mar 12
1
Problem with Office (and Windows 2000) and oplocks (and even without)
Since switching from Samba 2.2.3a-6 on Debian stable to 3.0.2a packages from
the samba.org server (system is Debian stable too) we've had extreme problems
with Office documents. Samba acts as a PDC and the user log onto it. The LDAP
Authentication works great. Our clients are all Windows 2000 and Office 2000.
When opening documents word (excel) sometimes just hangs (for 30 seconds until