similar to: RAID 0 Problems - resubmission as subsriber

Can some one help me with a ext3 file sys problem?? I have a raid 0 array that was not shut down properly due to bad contacts in a removable drive bay. It consists of two 80Gb drives. I can create /dev/md0 ok. but if fails during mount. When I run: fsck -n /dev/md0 it reports the following: fsck 1.32 e2fsck 1.32 SuperBlock has a bad ext3 journal (inode 8) clear? no fsck.ext2: illegal inode

Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described

Hi All, Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following. [root at ... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) /dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using latest "e2fsprogs.x86_64". Any ideas awould be much appreciated. Cheers Steve k

On Monday August 4, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> wrote: > > > > I came back this morning and found: > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted > > EXT3-fs error (device md0) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted >

I'm using Centos 4.5 right now, and I had a RAID 5 array stop because two drives became unavailable. After adjusting the cables on several occasions and shutting down and restarting, I was able to see the drives again. This is when I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Please, someone with vast knowledge of how RAID 5 with mdadm works, tell me if I have any chance at all

The klibc based early-userspace utilites I am using have the ability to bring up a raid device before control is passed to kinit. This is done in the case that one needs to do something else to the root device (i.e. it's encrypted or an lvm volume). That's fine and dandy, except that kinit reports a mess of errors about the devices, as they are already loaded. It appears there errors

I am setting up a Centos 6.5 box to host some Openvz containers. I have a 120gb SSD I am going to use for boot, / and swap. Should allow for fast boots. Have a 4TB drive I am going to mount as /backup and use to move container backups too etc. The remaining four 3TB drives I am putting in a software RAID 10 array and mount as /vz and all the containers will go there. It will have by far the

> What specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? > Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE > to move them. You are right moving the mail should be simple. I ask myself it is possible to store the date of the resubmission in the mail itself. Thomas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: > Am 05.02.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: >> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: >>>> What specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? >>>> Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: >> What specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? >> Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the >> mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE >> to move them. > > You are right moving the mail should be simple. > > I ask myself it

Hi, I have a raid 1 setup where /boot and the rest lies inside the md0 container. /dev/sda1 md0 has /boot /dev/sda2 md0 has swap /dev/sda3 md0 has / SCSI card is an ADAPTEC AIC79xx Grub as the bootloader Centos 4.1 as the OS version Two 70gb SCSI disks The server was working fine. Then a power outage. checked the board,disk,ram,etc. All fine. Now when I try to boot the server does not even reach

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: > I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. > > Use case: > > - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. > - Now I want to have some sort of resubmission: the mail should be

Hi, Sounds to me like it can be implemented using sieve. Something like "if is in inbox & is read & is older than n days; then mark as unread". But this means you need to redeliever this mail somehow. Maybe like this: http://serverfault.com/questions/418681/run-sieve-on-maildir (http://serverfault.com/questions/418681/run-sieve-on-maildir) Regards Andr? Am Mi., Febr. 4, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: > Am 04.02.2015 um 07:49 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: >> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: >> >>> I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. >> >>> Use case: >> >>> - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and

Hello, I have a GridEngine setup with 5 subnodes and two RAIDS attached. I backed up the OS drive - 120GB - to an external hard drive - 500GB - using ddrescue. The OS drive is partitioned as: sda1 has the OS and is about 7 GB sda2 has /var and is about 4 GB sda3 has swap and is about 1 GB After backing up, there were 4KB of errors, but all at the end of the disk around 118GB. This used to be

Hi all, I'm setting up Centos4.2 on 2x80GB SATA drives. The partition scheme is like this: /boot = 300MB / = 9.2GB /home = 70GB swap = 500MB The RAID is RAID 1. md0 = 300MB = /boot md1 = 9.2GB = LVM md2 = 70GB = LVM md3 = 500MB = LVM Now, the confusing part is: 1. When creating VolGroup00, should I include all PV (md1, md2, md3)? Then create the LV. 2. When setting up RAID 1, should I

Am 04.02.2015 um 07:49 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: > >> I would like to implement a 43Folder system[1] with dovecot and a mail user agent. > >> Use case: > >> - I have a new mail in my inbox. I read it and see that I can't handle it now. I want to handle this mail in 5 days. >> - Now I want to have some sort of

Am 05.02.2015 um 12:18 schrieb Steffen Kaiser: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Thomas G?ttler wrote: >>> What specific action shall be done via IMAP? The move? >>> Then use any IMAP client library, use the LIST command to get the mailboxes, FETCH to get the messages and COPY/EXPUNGE >>> to move them. > >> You are right moving the mail should be simple. > >>

Hello? Concerns were raised about the action of shutdown() on Unices - I replied with evidence suggesting that this would not be a problem. I have not heard anything since. If this has to be held over to 2.6.0, fair enough - but please tell me whether itjust needs time, or me to go and fix something??? Thanks Max. BEGIN PATCH diff -mru rsync-2.5.5/clientserver.c

Hi List, What this means? md: syncing RAID array md0 md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc. md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for reconstruction. md: using 128k window, over a total of 2096384 blocks. md: md0: sync done. RAID1 conf printout: --- wd:2 rd:2 disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda2 disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb2 sd 0:0:0:0: