similar to: FW: RE: Big problem with 2.2.X.

I have been using samba 2.0.X for over a year with solaris 2.6 and windows NT4. I have a windows application installed onto a Unix share which is mapped to the NT clients using samba. Everything has worked perfectly with the windows application untill i reciently tried upgrading to a 2.2.X version of Samba. ( I have tried 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.3a). Now when i try to start the windows application, it

Is anyone else experiencing problems with offline files and folders on Win 2K (SP4)? They are set up OK but when the Win2K machine goes off line and files are modified it won't sync back when back on the network. Error message from the file sync on windows is 'Access denied' (on the server) But I can easily do the overwrite manually so permissions are OK. Below is the log (level 10)

Hi, I havn't herd anything more about this but i have been doing some reading up on winbindd. It appears that i cant use this anyway as it only works on Linux at the moment and i'm using Solaris (Is this correct?). I have now removed winbindd my configuration. I'm still unsure about how to tell if its the domain SID or the SID of the box. Cheers Tom -----Original Message-----

Hello, I was hoping to reprovision the same domain by specifying the domain GUID in the command line tool 'samba-tool domain provision' but I am not sure if I missed something or if there is a bug but the specified domain GUID is not the one which is created for my domain. Specifying the domain SID seems to work as I would expect. I tested it with Samba shipped by Debian 11 (samba2

I am trying to run Samba 2.2.4 on solaris 2.8 with W2K clients. I have an NT app installed onto the Solaris 8 server which i would like to run off of the mapped samba network drive. When i try to start the NT app it attempts to read a file on the samba drive called .root.passwords but fails (This file can be accessed with notepad). The following is an extract from the samba error log. I get the

Hello, We're experiencing a problem with samba after an upgrade, which only occurs when using a strange combination of software. The problem only occurs with samba 2.2 and higher. This problem does not occur with samba 2.0. We tested this with samba 3.0alpha17, 2.2.2, 2.2.4, and 2.0.10 First off, sticking to procedure, TESTs 1-11 as described in DIAGNOSIS.txt succeed. I've gone as

I'm trying to upgrade from samba3 -> 4. I ran this command: WORKDIR=/usr/local/mobius /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=$WORKDIR/var --use-xattrs=yes --realm=infinityhealthcare.com $WORKDIR/smb.conf but it failed with the error given in this email's subject. What does it mean, and how do I fix it? This is just another is a growing line of errors that

I recently ran into a problem accessing Samba shares from SFU. From SFU's /net directory, I could read from files, move files, create directories and even append to files using >>. But, when I tried to create a file, I received a "Permission Denied" message. After looking at the logs I found something which looked out of place. I am currently using (I tried many different

ClassicUpgrade of my samba3 data to samba4 fails, with this error: ERROR(<class 'passdb.error'>): uncaught exception - Unable to get id for sid Full log of the classicupgrade is at the end of this email. Project member on this list, Andrew Barlett, wrote that the issue is probably that my Samba 3 passdb was passable in an NT 4 DC mode, but is actually 'invalid' :

Hi, Search on the net but not getting enough information to resolve the issue. As per suggestion to check the sysvol but mine got issues. Currently using CentOS 8.1.1911 and a compiled samba 4.11.4 based on Fedora 31. I tried also to delete the broken GPO policy E4108E65-68AB-4E2D-9A00-A9063B1558E3 but I can't delete it (using samba-tool gpo del {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

Hello I just moved a win nt file server to linux/samba I've performance problem with the new server thought it's a more powerful machine (and os ;-) ): programs loaded from shares take (much) longer to start A network trace shows up that the throughput needed to achieve the program run (double clic to start then exit) from the linux server is more than 3 times the one needed to run from

On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 11:38 +0200, mj via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I joined a new samba-4.7 DC to our AD, replicated everything over, then > turned off the old DCs, seized fsmo roles, and added two extra 4.7 DCs. > > Everything above succeeded without warnings, and everything seems to be > running very well finally, except for the sysvolcheck / sysvolreset. > >

Whenever I try to add or remove a user for access to a file I get the following error: "Unable to save permission change on <filename>. Access is denied". I took a look at my smbd log file and found this: [2002/08/29 10:40:00, 5] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(433) unpack_nt_owners: validating owner_sids. [2002/08/29 10:40:00, 5] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(474)

Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in

I am running Samba 2.2.3a on Solaris 8 with NT4 and windows 2000 clients (both NT4 and w2k have the same problem). I have a situation where by I have a windows NT application installed onto the samba share. When i try to start the application it crashes with an error complaining that it is unable to read a file. The debug log shows the following with relation to the file

Hi list, I'd like to raise the issue discussed in the thread below. I've faced exactly the same problem and came to exactly the same way out - shutdown winbindd and use "force unknown acl user". We use "simple" mapping in the environment - all AD accounts have corresponding NIS accounts (the same name) and the mapping is being done by smbd. The problem here is that

Hi all, I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, ie. mixed mode). I'm also using ACLs. Imagine I have a file on the server with an ownership of DOMAIN+foo (full permission - rwx). I also have a user ACL on that file of DOMAIN+bar, also rwx. This all works fine. I was initially running into a problem

Hi all I'm having some problems trying to configure ACLs from a Win2000 SP3 client. I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on kernel 2.4.18 (with acl + ext attr), Samba is compiled with acl support etc. Samba is configured with security=domain, and is running with local groups etc rather than thru winbind, I haven't been game enough to tread those waters yet. With the debug level set to 5

Hello! Any idea ? Regards Em 31-05-2017 12:00, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: > > Hi > > My configuration: > > smb.conf > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = MYSERVER > realm = interno.mydomain.com.br > netbios name = DC-LINUX > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs,

Dear all We run Samba 3.5.8 on a Solaris 11 box on top of ZFS We got the impression that the VFS module acl_xattr provides the best way of keeping Windows ACLs. We don't have concurrent NFS or local users so it's Windows only. The clients as well as the Samba server are members of an AD domain. Creating files/directories works as expected and also manipulating permissions for the initial