similar to: EXT3 + ACL + SAMBA problem

I tried running ext3 with posix acls (see http://acl.bestbits.at). The patches were easily merged and everything compiled fine. I created a journal.dat on my /home fs and mounted it as ext3. So far everything worked perfectly. But getfacl/setfacl didn't work on ext3. Mounting /home as ext2 solved the problem. Maybe ext3 and ext2 don't share enough code to get it working without rewriting

G'day... I've installed the acl - xatrrib patch from bestbits and it works nice on my RH9 system with Samba.. the only problem i encounter is that a file or directory losses it's extended atrributes when you copy it.. for example cp "--preserve=all /source /destination" preserves the normal acl af the linux system, but skips the acl/xattrib from bestbits. i used the

To all: I was wondering if there was any talk regarding the possible inclusion into either kernel 2.4.x or 2.5.x of a general and standard ACL interface for file system security. I've used the ACL patch from acl.bestbits.at on ext3 & love it dearly except for the quota issues. Despite those issues I absolutely could not live without ACL's on large file servers with a few hundred or

> Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:44:26 -0700 > From: Nicholas Erkert <nick@erkert.com> > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread > > Glen Mabey wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:07:57PM -0400, Jos? Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: >>> >> >>>>>you can use an Athlon

Paul, Your samba does have ACLs support built-in. Please check that your system has the ACLs support libraries. Since you are using kernel 2.4.x you need to have the bestbits acls support libraries installed on your machine. Check the documentation for XFS to see how to mount the XFS file system so it has ACLs support. You should manually be able to set POSIX ACLs using the setfacls utility.

Documentation/ext3.txt suggests that the "user_xattr" and "acl" mount options are on by default. This doesn't seem to be the case, as the kernel deduces the default mount options from the filesystem superblock, and mke2fs does not appear to write any default mount options there. This error was spotted by Jacques de Mer. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd at

hi, I am trying to run a 3.0.6 on ADS network with "--with-acl-support" enabled on configure time. I also compiled the linux kernel 2.4.25 witch acl patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/. Samba shares is visible from the network and vice-versa. BUT, I can't change the ACL on samba shared files. I've read the HOWTO to change file permission from: 1. Remote Computer management mmc

Hi everyone I've been trying to setup samba file sharing with acl support for the past few days. I recompiled my kernel with acl support, and have verified that setfacl and getfacl are working properly. I compiled samba on my test machine with acl enabled, and was able to access and create files. However, I cannot grant additional users permissions on the shared files,

A patch that implements acls on ext3 for kernel 2.2.x is available at http://moldybread.net/patch/kernel-2.2/ It looks to be stable. Beat it, break it.

Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.

Hello, I am having problem setting permission on shared folder: the folder is?datasamba/common and after I set full permission for a user itester (3000017) and also?tester (3000018), I could see that it is only granting r-x to those users. but I could see from the default permissions that they have rwx. getfacl /datasamba/common # file: datasamba/common # owner: root # group: users #

Samba friends, I need someone to explain to me what should work when I use Samba 2.2 as a fileserver, which is a member of a Samba TNG domain, with acl.bestbits.at's ACL implementation. I set this up to gain 2 things. 1) The ability to apply fine grained access control to files and dirs 2) The ability to be able to modify, add, or remove those permissions from an nt client or server that is a

Hi. I want to use ACL on my RH-9.0 box (x86), so I got ext3 ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ and tried to apply it to the kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing

Hi, As I can see in the last mailing list I am not the only one to get problems with ACL support in Linux. Whatever the samba version (2.2.4, 2.2.5) the main problem is how acl and extended attributes can be implemented fine in linux. I've installed samba on AIX systems where acl is implemented (native) and NT ACL works fine at each time (the only difficulty there is that nsswitch is not

Hi all I've written a few mails to the list hoping that I might get some hint to what mistake I've been making in configuring my samba server with acl support, but haven't been able to figure out much to date. I'm sending some parts of my log files with a description of my problem as a last hope-- I will have to go through the manuals from cover to cover if I dont get an

Intro: There have been a few postings on this subject with few answers. If anyone knows where to point those of us trying to work this out, or will enlighten us as to the limitations of ACL's and Samba, we would appreciate your help. So far, acl.bestbits.at does not have any information on this particular problem. Environment: Samba 3.0 alpha 21 or 23 (I skipped 22, but most likely it had

Hello, last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the log from fsck using the read-only option: How to recover from this savely? How to avoid this in future? i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs. If you need more informations please mail.

Which filesystem supports ACL? Ext2/ext3 with the acl.bestbits.at patch, XFS and what other? Does 2.4.18 supports XFS or do you need a patch for it? What about ACL on XFS? Do you need a patch? Is there any filesystem that supports ACL, that the kernel supports without patches? Any place I can find a comparison of different filesystems with advantage and disadvantage of each? The Filesystems HOWTO

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

I want to modify ACL on files which are on a win2K3 server from a Debian Sarge server. my config. is: Linux Debian Sarge testing with kernel 2.6 samba 3.0.22 configured with winbind krb5 installed, the Linux server is member of a AD domain on witch the win2K3 server is a domain controller. I want to do the following (as root): smbmount //mywin2k3server/share /mnt/smb/mountingfolder -o