similar to: (no subject)

Hi all, Jeremy, after trying to add kernel oplocks = no I got the same errors as describes in my last post. (samba working, but some folders not accessible, even not from commandline unix, can't kill smbd processes......) This is what happens in the log file: any ideas ? [2001/11/29 16:13:00, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(610) pc08ust (10.21.1.8) connect to service exchangejg99 as

Hello, i am running Samba 2.2.3a on a Red Hat Linux 7.3 box with kernel 2.4.18-10. I am experiencing some problems on a particular samba share, which is accessed by 10 Windows 98SE clients working on a COBOL production packet by mapping with a G: letters this samba folder. Well, some times a day it happens that this packed blocks because some files on that samba folder remains locked; i

Hello, all. I'm using Samba 2.2.2 at my FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE server, and have next problems: There is pool of W2K machines, each starting compilation job (usually 2 at one dual CPU machine). Then these jobs trying to simultaneously access sources, located at Samba server, appear problems. Then I running 2 compilation threads from single machine - there is no problems. For jobs error seems

When 2.2.4 was released, I updated my cvs and did ./configure and make (no special options). Since I came in somewhat early today and nobody was around I did the make install. Everything ran fine until I tried to load a particular file and I'm receiving the following error and unable to open the file on a network share. If I place the file on a local drive it loads fine. Permissions and

Hi, Has anyone any ideas what is causing my smbd processes to crash? The files being accessed via samba are on an NFS mounted directory. In the samba log file I am getting the following errors: [2004/12/03 16:31:33, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1026) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2181 9 on port 53336 for dev = 2c00002, inode = 297939333

Hi everyone, Trying to copy a 3.5MB file from a Windows 2000 workstation to a FreeBSD 4.6.2 server running samba-2.2.6.p2. The 3.5MB file is an MS Access file called MoldFE.mdb. After a few seconds of copying the file, a message box pops up on the W2K workstation that states "Cannot copy MoldFE: The specified network name is no longer available". In /var/log/messages, I see this:

Hello, System: Solaris 8/9 Samba: 3.02 and 3.06 We have problems with accessing files (from Windows XP) on a samba server that are mounted over nfs (on the server). Some users have symlinks in their home directories to nfs resources. When they try to copy file located in nfs the client simply hangs. To make the thing even stranger: Sometimes it also works (after restarting the samba server

Hi all, We have a HP-UX 11i server running as a samba server. Users use Windows 2000 boxes with Service Pack 4 to connect to the samba server. Several days ago, we upgraded samba server from 2.0.7 to 3.0.5, and we started to experience the following problem: The general connection and access to the samba server is ok. However, under the samba share there have been some directories mounted from

Hi all, I use samba 2.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2 (1500 NT4 sp6a / w2k sp2 workstation). since i had updated from 2.0.7 to 2.2.2 the CPU load will very fast go to 100% an d teh memory use of a smbd process will grow up to 100 MB. In teh log-files are many errors like that: PANIC: open_mode_check: Existant process 22700 left active oplock smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(555) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock

Hi all, I've posted a similar message a few weeks ago. I had the 'oplock' problem. I run a linux server with samba (specification below). I get a reply who told me to disable kernel oplocks and oplocks. I did exactly what he told me to do. I hoped it worked... but it did not... From there one i started reading in the archives and followed the 'lock' discussions in this list.

We're using CentOS samba for about 20 workstations, mostly XP, some 2000 and two win98. Samba shares a data directory with Word, Excel and Access documents/db's. Also Exact for Dos is running from this share (executable and data). The users experience a long delay every morning opening the first Word document (Word 97, Word 2000). This could take 10 minutes or so. If they close

I have been searching for info on this and haven't found an authoritative answer. From what I have read, oplocks are good because they increase connection speeds, but they are bad because they don't really work, but they actually do work, but they only work in some cases, etc etc. so, here's my problem and my question together: I get tons of these messages every day (over a thousand a

Hello, I'm running a samba 3.0.14a server in production on a fedora core 3 (kernel 2.6.9-1.667smp) with a least 250 clients (XP Pro SP2) (up to 400 sometimes). A few days ago, a problem appeared with a soft that we are using for a long time. (Petit Robert, a french dictionnary). When someone launch the dictionnary, many clients are freezed when they try to access to the "start

Hi, We have a major problem using Samba to access NFS mounted directories. The directory in question is on a Snap server running OS 3, and Samba is running on a new Sun V250 running Solaris 9; the NFS directory is mounted using udp. The problems occur when trying to load a file, which causes the samba process to crash. Another process starts automatically, crashes and so forth. However, the

Hi, i have a problem with access xp (2002) database files after moving the files to the linux files server. really often (6 times today) the database file is corrupt. i am running samba 2.2.5 on linux mandrake 8.2 with kernel 2.4.18. i have read that this has something to do with the file locking, but don't know what to do right now. i've set the parameter "veto oplock files =

Hello, I am running Samba 2.2.2 with acl-0.7.16 on RedHat 6.2 (2.2.19). The PDC is a Windows 2000 Server and the Samba server is a domain member using Winbind. All the workstations are Windoze 2000 Pro with SP2. Everything seemingly works fine but every day or two I get a runaway SMBD process which hogs the CPU and becomes unkillable. The only resolution is to reboot the server completely.

We are trying to troubleshoot slow performance. A lot of my NT client log files show messages like this about oplock break issues. [2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2 64 [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395) process_local_message:

<Long Post, sorry!> Folks, I have a really nasty problem preventing me from migrating a bunch of NetWare 5 servers to Samba--attempts to copy large (> 2MB+) files to any samba share results in an error. To clarify what I mean by "error": 1. I attempt to copy, using explorer, a 2MB+ file to any samba share. 2. A 30 second or so pause occurs (copying this file to any other

I have follow ERROR Message in my log: [code] #cat samba.log.tn-ss1lxgxvomck [2004/03/21 13:34:32, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436) read_data: read failure for 45164. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/03/21 13:39:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1011) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 4146 on port 1031 for dev = 1601, inode = 134,

We have been using samba for years now and are generally very happy. But since a recent upgrade to 2.2.8 we have seen samba slowing down periodically to a crawl every 2 or 3 days. BTW the start of these problems coincided with the upgrade to samba 2.2.8 and a partial cabling upgrade to 100 MBit, which also coincided with the introduction of the first Win XP Pro machines to our LAN. ;-( We have