Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "benchmarks galore..."
2004 Nov 28
3
file_set_dosmode / No data available with 3.0.8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
after upgrading to samba 3.0.8 (debian/unstable, i386) i too encounter
similar problems as reported here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/095567.html
upon logoff from a win2k(sp4) client, the profile cannot be saved and the
samba logfile from the client (prinz) gives:
[2004/11/26 17:57:06, 2]
2005 Oct 07
0
benchmarks galore...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
[cc'ing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!]
hi,
every now and then i'm running some benchmarks on filesystems i really
use...here are the results:
http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/bonnie.html
http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/
may it be of some help....
thanks,
Christian.
PS:
2005 May 08
0
2.6.12-rc3-mm2 benchmarks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[!! i've Cc'ed several fs lists, please remove when when replying !!]
hi all,
from time to time i do some benchmarks for several filesystems and several
crypto-algorithms too, details here:
http://nerdbynature.de/bench/
latest results here:
http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/bonnie.html
2004 Dec 22
0
Re-4: Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
I modified the CUPS access rights (defined in cupsd.conf).
Before that only users of administrative group had access to
the printer configuration parts.
Now I removed all access restrictions, so that anyone
can access all CUPS services (printers, jobs, ...)
(we use this, because sometimes we need to hold printers manually ...).
But, as I mentioned, I don't find the relationship
between this
2006 Apr 28
1
auto_complete galore
List,
I''m using auto_complete with textfield, called CompanyCode. so when you
type fx ''0403'' it will show a list with matching company codes, and the
respective company name - like so:
040333 - Some company inc
040322 - Another company
040323 - whatever Corp.
Anyway, once a user selects one of the entries from the list - the whole
text (name and code) is put into
2007 May 29
0
Migration from tpop3d to dovecot - troubles galore!
Hi people,
I am trying to migrate some users from tpop3d (Maildir mailboxes) to
dovecot. The most important aspect of this migration, and which I
cannot seem to get right, is to first be able to make dovecot to
authenticate against the current DB being used by tpop3d so that
I can use imapsync to transfer the user mails. And I do believe
that is what I am unable to get right!!
So here goes what
2004 Dec 15
4
Re-2: Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
That was a good hint!
Yes, I've installed SP2, and it realy seems to be the Problem.
Now I've checked that on a machine with SP1 - and the jobs
from the same printqueue are removed correctly there!
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ? (14-Dez-2004 19:13)
From: novosirj@umdnj.edu
To: t.pompe@architekt-prinz.at
>
2003 Jun 25
0
Re: Ext3-users digest, Vol 1 #910 - 5 msgs
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote :
>Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to
> ext3-users@redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ext3-users-request@redhat.com
>
>You can reach the person
2003 Jun 21
2
some benchmarks
hi,
i've made *some* benchmarks, i plan to do more. benchmarks requests
welcome, e.g. "please test this...with that.."
https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/benchmark.html
but only in
https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/prinz
are results right now.
I hope this is helpful.
Thanks,
Christian.
2004 Mar 22
1
Assertion failure in ext3_put_super() at fs/ext3/super.c:412
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
today i re-organized my data, lots of "mv" and "cp".
then, upon unmounting a ext3 partition the following was shown on the
console:
(the leading "Mar 22 02:40:04 sheep kernel:" is cut here)
- -------------------------------
~ sb orphan head is 940994
~ sb_info orphan list:
~ inode sdd4:940994 at cf852874: mode
2006 Nov 21
0
2.6.19-rc5-git4 benchmarks
Apologies for the wide alias, but as it may interest serveral
fs groups, here it is:
In the everlasting search for the best fs for my shiny new disks, I
was interested in some numbers, here're the results:
http://nerdbynature.de/bench/amd64/2.6.19-rc5-git4/test-3/dm-crypt-3.html
details: http://nerdbynature.de/wp/?cat=4
(in short: ext3 pretty fast in all operations. then again, the numbers
2014 May 19
0
[Bug 1937] Make it possible to give a give an ssh session only access to a limit subset of ssh-agent keys
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1937
Christian Kujau <mindrot at nerdbynature.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mindrot at nerdbynature.de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
2009 Dec 24
6
benchmark results
I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a
few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few
generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
Reiserfs
2009 Dec 24
6
benchmark results
I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a
few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few
generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
Reiserfs
2013 May 24
3
[Bug 1585] Allow an `Include' option which reads another config file in place and does not error out when `Include' file not readable
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585
--- Comment #8 from mindrot at nerdbynature.de ---
Created attachment 2274
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2274&action=edit
Include option patch for OpenSSH 6.2
This is really just a modified version of Gavin Beatty's patch,
slightly altered so it'll apply cleanly to OpenSSH 6.2 (i.e. yesterdays
CVS checkout).
2012 Mar 21
1
nfslock
I just updated one of our servers to 5.8, and rebooted. In the logs, I saw
a bunch of
Mar 21 16:29:02 <server> rpc.statd[9783]: recv_rply: can't decode RPC
message!
Mar 21 16:29:33 <server> last message repeated 442 times
Mar 21 16:30:34 <server> last message repeated 835 times
Mar 21 16:31:36 <server> last message repeated 884 times
Mar 21 16:32:38 <server> last
2004 Dec 14
4
Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
Hello!
I'm using samba with CUPS printing (with raw passthru)
for a long time now and it worked very well.
But after upgrading my samba installation from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9,
the printjobs (sent from XP Workstations) aren't
removed from the joblist anymore.
Means: the job is printed correctly, but opening the
printqueue on the XP machine still contains the job
(not only mine, but jobs from
2008 Sep 04
3
Samba server as part of AD domain keeps asking for username and password
Hello all,
I'm trying to set up my samba server rev 3.2.3 on opensuse 10.3 as a
member of the active directory domain, so that client connections can be
authenticated by the AD server. Unfortunately when I try to connect to
the samba server from a windows XP system, it keeps on asking me for
user name and password.
I've been reading through various howto's and descriptions but no
2025 Jun 02
0
[Bug 3832] New: [PATCH] typo: MaxStartups instead of Maxstartups
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3832
Bug ID: 3832
Summary: [PATCH] typo: MaxStartups instead of Maxstartups
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 10.0p2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2010 Feb 05
6
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60
When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the
following messages are printed:
[28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[28654.685036] Kernel